Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Eastern Africa Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 124,827,429 people shows a substantial negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Eastern Africa within Chickasaw communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.594. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chickasaw within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.013% in Immigrants from Eastern Africa. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chickasaw corresponds to a decrease of 13.4 Immigrants from Eastern Africa.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Eastern Africa communities in the United States are seen in median household income ($70,005 compared to $84,299, a difference of 20.4%), per capita income ($36,475 compared to $43,838, a difference of 20.2%), and median family income ($85,356 compared to $102,451, a difference of 20.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median male earnings ($47,832 compared to $53,713, a difference of 12.3%), householder income over 65 years ($53,732 compared to $61,157, a difference of 13.8%), and householder income under 25 years ($44,763 compared to $51,158, a difference of 14.3%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Eastern Africa communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (16.3% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 32.6%), single father poverty (19.0% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 28.9%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (17.0% compared to 13.6%, a difference of 25.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.7% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 2.9%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.6% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 3.8%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (19.5% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 10.6%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Eastern Africa communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.0% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 24.9%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.2% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 23.3%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.3% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 18.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male unemployment (5.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 0.31%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (16.7% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 0.51%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.2% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 0.66%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Eastern Africa communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (62.3% compared to 68.5%, a difference of 9.9%), in labor force | age 20-64 (76.2% compared to 81.3%, a difference of 6.7%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (79.0% compared to 83.9%, a difference of 6.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (74.5% compared to 77.5%, a difference of 4.1%), in labor force | age 30-34 (81.9% compared to 85.9%, a difference of 4.9%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (81.9% compared to 86.0%, a difference of 5.0%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Eastern Africa communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (36.3% compared to 31.0%, a difference of 17.2%), divorced or separated (14.2% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 16.2%), and single father households (2.8% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 13.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.19 compared to 3.22, a difference of 0.88%), family households with children (28.2% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 2.0%), and single mother households (7.0% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 3.0%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Eastern Africa communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 29.8%), no vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 27.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 23.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 90.1%, a difference of 2.4%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.0% compared to 53.7%, a difference of 9.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 23.2%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Eastern Africa communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (11.4% compared to 16.3%, a difference of 43.1%), professional degree (3.4% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 43.1%), and no schooling completed (1.7% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 42.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 11th grade (92.3% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 0.090%), high school diploma (88.4% compared to 88.9%, a difference of 0.58%), and 12th grade, no diploma (90.3% compared to 90.9%, a difference of 0.63%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Eastern Africa communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (4.5% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 60.5%), vision disability (3.2% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 55.2%), and disability age under 5 (1.7% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 45.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.5% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 0.68%), disability age over 75 (51.2% compared to 47.2%, a difference of 8.5%), and disability age 5 to 17 (6.8% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 20.7%).