Chickasaw vs Australian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 100,000,331 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Australians within Chickasaw communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.263. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chickasaw within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.003% in Australians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chickasaw corresponds to a decrease of 2.8 Australians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Australian communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($36,475 compared to $52,074, a difference of 42.8%), median family income ($85,356 compared to $118,440, a difference of 38.8%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($77,929 compared to $107,912, a difference of 38.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.2% compared to 28.2%, a difference of 3.7%), householder income under 25 years ($44,763 compared to $53,739, a difference of 20.1%), and householder income over 65 years ($53,732 compared to $66,891, a difference of 24.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Australian communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (21.8% compared to 15.5%, a difference of 40.8%), family poverty (10.8% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 38.7%), and receiving food stamps (13.1% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 36.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.6% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 1.4%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.7% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 7.5%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (24.5% compared to 20.8%, a difference of 17.8%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Australian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.0% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 24.3%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.3% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 19.0%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.2% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 16.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.8% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 0.69%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.6% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 0.88%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.2% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 2.0%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Australian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (62.3% compared to 65.3%, a difference of 4.8%), in labor force | age 45-54 (79.0% compared to 82.5%, a difference of 4.4%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (76.2% compared to 79.5%, a difference of 4.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (74.5% compared to 75.5%, a difference of 1.4%), in labor force | age 16-19 (38.3% compared to 37.8%, a difference of 1.5%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (81.9% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 3.7%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Australian communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.8% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 26.5%), single mother households (7.0% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 26.5%), and births to unmarried women (36.3% compared to 29.5%, a difference of 22.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.19 compared to 3.13, a difference of 1.8%), currently married (46.6% compared to 47.6%, a difference of 2.1%), and family households (64.4% compared to 62.8%, a difference of 2.5%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Australian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 28.5%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 13.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 20.1%, a difference of 10.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 90.0%, a difference of 2.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.0% compared to 56.7%, a difference of 4.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 20.1%, a difference of 10.4%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Australian communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.4% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 75.1%), master's degree (11.4% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 61.0%), and doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 58.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.4% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.060%), kindergarten (98.4% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.060%), and 1st grade (98.3% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.060%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Australian communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (3.2% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 54.4%), disability age 35 to 64 (16.1% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 49.8%), and hearing disability (4.5% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 41.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.5% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 7.8%), disability age over 75 (51.2% compared to 45.7%, a difference of 12.1%), and disability age 5 to 17 (6.8% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 24.1%).