Chickasaw vs Icelander Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 83,051,684 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Icelanders within Chickasaw communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.206. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chickasaw within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.097% in Icelanders. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chickasaw corresponds to an increase of 96.6 Icelanders.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Icelander communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($82,193 compared to $102,261, a difference of 24.4%), per capita income ($36,475 compared to $44,987, a difference of 23.3%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($77,929 compared to $95,560, a difference of 22.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.2% compared to 27.5%, a difference of 1.1%), median female earnings ($34,414 compared to $39,109, a difference of 13.6%), and householder income over 65 years ($53,732 compared to $61,270, a difference of 14.0%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Icelander communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (21.8% compared to 16.3%, a difference of 33.5%), single male poverty (16.3% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 31.0%), and single father poverty (19.0% compared to 14.5%, a difference of 30.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.6% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 0.91%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.7% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 4.3%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (24.5% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 13.8%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Icelander communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.0% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 30.8%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.2% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 17.5%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.4% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 16.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (9.9% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 0.050%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.2% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 0.52%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.8% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 1.4%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Icelander communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.3% compared to 40.8%, a difference of 6.4%), in labor force | age > 16 (62.3% compared to 65.6%, a difference of 5.4%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (79.0% compared to 82.8%, a difference of 4.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (74.5% compared to 76.9%, a difference of 3.3%), in labor force | age 30-34 (81.9% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 3.4%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (81.9% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 3.5%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Icelander communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (36.3% compared to 30.3%, a difference of 19.7%), single father households (2.8% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 18.9%), and divorced or separated (14.2% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 18.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.19 compared to 3.19, a difference of 0.080%), currently married (46.6% compared to 47.3%, a difference of 1.5%), and family households (64.4% compared to 63.3%, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Icelander communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 22.5%), 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 3.2%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 90.5%, a difference of 1.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 0.69%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.0% compared to 58.0%, a difference of 1.7%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 90.5%, a difference of 1.9%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Icelander communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.4% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 42.4%), doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 36.0%), and master's degree (11.4% compared to 15.5%, a difference of 35.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 7th grade (96.7% compared to 96.7%, a difference of 0.010%), 6th grade (97.6% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.030%), and 4th grade (98.0% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.040%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Icelander communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (3.2% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 48.3%), disability age under 5 (1.7% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 44.2%), and disability age 35 to 64 (16.1% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 41.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.5% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 5.0%), disability age over 75 (51.2% compared to 46.7%, a difference of 9.6%), and disability age 5 to 17 (6.8% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 19.5%).