Chickasaw vs Alsatian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 54,292,177 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Alsatians within Chickasaw communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.406. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chickasaw within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.484% in Alsatians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chickasaw corresponds to an increase of 484.1 Alsatians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Alsatian communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($36,475 compared to $47,284, a difference of 29.6%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($82,193 compared to $100,435, a difference of 22.2%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($77,929 compared to $95,059, a difference of 22.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($44,763 compared to $49,267, a difference of 10.1%), wage/income gap (27.2% compared to 24.7%, a difference of 10.1%), and householder income over 65 years ($53,732 compared to $61,797, a difference of 15.0%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Alsatian communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 25-34 year olds (17.0% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 15.5%), receiving food stamps (13.1% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 14.6%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (21.8% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 14.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (34.4% compared to 34.3%, a difference of 0.33%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (24.5% compared to 24.4%, a difference of 0.38%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (19.8% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 3.8%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Alsatian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.3% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 33.9%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.0% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 25.9%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (16.7% compared to 20.5%, a difference of 23.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.7% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 0.050%), female unemployment (5.1% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 4.3%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (9.9% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 4.3%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Alsatian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.3% compared to 35.9%, a difference of 6.9%), in labor force | age 35-44 (80.9% compared to 84.4%, a difference of 4.3%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (81.9% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 4.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (74.5% compared to 74.8%, a difference of 0.44%), in labor force | age 25-29 (81.9% compared to 83.9%, a difference of 2.4%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (79.0% compared to 81.3%, a difference of 2.9%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Alsatian communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.8% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 28.2%), divorced or separated (14.2% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 19.5%), and single mother households (7.0% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 14.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.19 compared to 3.14, a difference of 1.5%), currently married (46.6% compared to 45.7%, a difference of 1.9%), and married-couple households (45.9% compared to 44.8%, a difference of 2.4%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Alsatian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 67.4%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 37.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 23.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 87.1%, a difference of 5.9%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.0% compared to 52.5%, a difference of 12.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 23.5%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Alsatian communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.4% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 54.9%), master's degree (11.4% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 47.8%), and doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 42.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 10th grade (94.1% compared to 93.8%, a difference of 0.26%), 11th grade (92.3% compared to 92.6%, a difference of 0.29%), and nursery school (98.4% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.31%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Alsatian communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.7% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 44.7%), hearing disability (4.5% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 43.8%), and disability age 35 to 64 (16.1% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 36.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.5% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 4.8%), disability age over 75 (51.2% compared to 47.3%, a difference of 8.2%), and disability age 5 to 17 (6.8% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 18.1%).