Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Dominica Community Comparison
COMPARE
Chickasaw
Immigrants from Dominica
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Chickasaw
Immigrants from Dominica
3,663
SOCIAL INDEX
34.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
212th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
427
SOCIAL INDEX
1.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
345th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Immigrants from Dominica Integration in Chickasaw Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 46,353,782 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Dominica within Chickasaw communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.361. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chickasaw within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.034% in Immigrants from Dominica. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chickasaw corresponds to a decrease of 33.7 Immigrants from Dominica.
Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Dominica Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Dominica communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (27.2% compared to 20.0%, a difference of 35.6%), householder income under 25 years ($44,763 compared to $50,301, a difference of 12.4%), and median female earnings ($34,414 compared to $37,825, a difference of 9.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median family income ($85,356 compared to $85,411, a difference of 0.060%), median male earnings ($47,832 compared to $47,651, a difference of 0.38%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($82,193 compared to $83,311, a difference of 1.4%).
Income Metric | Chickasaw | Immigrants from Dominica |
Per Capita Income | Tragic $36,475 | Tragic $37,952 |
Median Family Income | Tragic $85,356 | Tragic $85,411 |
Median Household Income | Tragic $70,005 | Tragic $72,760 |
Median Earnings | Tragic $40,672 | Tragic $42,420 |
Median Male Earnings | Tragic $47,832 | Tragic $47,651 |
Median Female Earnings | Tragic $34,414 | Tragic $37,825 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Tragic $44,763 | Tragic $50,301 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Tragic $77,929 | Tragic $81,351 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Tragic $82,193 | Tragic $83,311 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Tragic $53,732 | Tragic $50,071 |
Wage/Income Gap | Tragic 27.2% | Exceptional 20.0% |
Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Dominica Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Dominica communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.6% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 46.1%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.7% compared to 15.5%, a difference of 44.8%), and receiving food stamps (13.1% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 40.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (19.0% compared to 18.9%, a difference of 0.52%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (17.0% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 3.3%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (21.8% compared to 22.7%, a difference of 4.0%).
Poverty Metric | Chickasaw | Immigrants from Dominica |
Poverty | Tragic 14.7% | Tragic 16.1% |
Families | Tragic 10.8% | Tragic 12.7% |
Males | Tragic 13.5% | Tragic 14.7% |
Females | Tragic 15.9% | Tragic 17.5% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 24.5% | Tragic 21.9% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 17.0% | Tragic 16.5% |
Children Under 5 years | Tragic 21.8% | Tragic 22.7% |
Children Under 16 years | Tragic 19.5% | Tragic 21.9% |
Boys Under 16 years | Tragic 19.8% | Tragic 22.2% |
Girls Under 16 years | Tragic 19.6% | Tragic 22.1% |
Single Males | Tragic 16.3% | Tragic 14.5% |
Single Females | Tragic 26.3% | Tragic 23.9% |
Single Fathers | Tragic 19.0% | Tragic 18.9% |
Single Mothers | Tragic 34.4% | Tragic 32.5% |
Married Couples | Tragic 5.8% | Tragic 7.1% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Good 10.7% | Tragic 15.5% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Exceptional 11.6% | Tragic 17.0% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Tragic 13.1% | Tragic 18.4% |
Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Dominica Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Dominica communities in the United States are seen in male unemployment (5.2% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 35.4%), unemployment (5.0% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 33.9%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.3% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 33.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.0% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 3.7%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.8% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 13.8%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.2% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 18.0%).
Unemployment Metric | Chickasaw | Immigrants from Dominica |
Unemployment | Exceptional 5.0% | Tragic 6.7% |
Males | Excellent 5.2% | Tragic 7.0% |
Females | Excellent 5.1% | Tragic 6.5% |
Youth < 25 | Exceptional 11.2% | Tragic 14.6% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Exceptional 16.7% | Tragic 21.9% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Exceptional 9.9% | Tragic 12.8% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Fair 6.7% | Tragic 8.4% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Tragic 6.2% | Tragic 7.3% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 4.9% | Tragic 6.0% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Exceptional 4.2% | Tragic 5.6% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Good 4.8% | Tragic 5.5% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Exceptional 4.3% | Tragic 5.4% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 4.7% | Tragic 6.0% |
Seniors > 65 | Exceptional 4.4% | Tragic 5.8% |
Seniors > 75 | Exceptional 7.3% | Tragic 9.8% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Tragic 9.0% | Tragic 8.6% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Exceptional 8.6% | Tragic 10.5% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Good 5.4% | Tragic 7.0% |
Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Dominica Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Dominica communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.3% compared to 32.5%, a difference of 18.0%), in labor force | age > 16 (62.3% compared to 64.5%, a difference of 3.6%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (74.5% compared to 71.9%, a difference of 3.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (81.9% compared to 83.4%, a difference of 1.8%), in labor force | age 45-54 (79.0% compared to 80.8%, a difference of 2.2%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (81.9% compared to 84.0%, a difference of 2.5%).
Labor Participation Metric | Chickasaw | Immigrants from Dominica |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 62.3% | Tragic 64.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Tragic 76.2% | Tragic 78.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 38.3% | Tragic 32.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Poor 74.5% | Tragic 71.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Tragic 81.9% | Tragic 83.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 81.9% | Tragic 84.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 80.9% | Tragic 83.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 79.0% | Tragic 80.8% |
Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Dominica Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Dominica communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (7.0% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 24.0%), married-couple households (45.9% compared to 39.4%, a difference of 16.6%), and currently married (46.6% compared to 40.3%, a difference of 15.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.4% compared to 63.4%, a difference of 1.6%), family households with children (28.2% compared to 27.2%, a difference of 3.9%), and average family size (3.19 compared to 3.32, a difference of 4.1%).
Family Structure Metric | Chickasaw | Immigrants from Dominica |
Family Households | Good 64.4% | Tragic 63.4% |
Family Households with Children | Exceptional 28.2% | Poor 27.2% |
Married-couple Households | Fair 45.9% | Tragic 39.4% |
Average Family Size | Tragic 3.19 | Exceptional 3.32 |
Single Father Households | Tragic 2.8% | Tragic 2.5% |
Single Mother Households | Tragic 7.0% | Tragic 8.7% |
Currently Married | Average 46.6% | Tragic 40.3% |
Divorced or Separated | Tragic 14.2% | Tragic 12.6% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Tragic 36.3% | Tragic 39.5% |
Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Dominica Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Dominica communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 183.0%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 77.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 13.7%, a difference of 61.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 77.8%, a difference of 18.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.0% compared to 41.6%, a difference of 41.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 13.7%, a difference of 61.9%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Chickasaw | Immigrants from Dominica |
No Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.9% | Tragic 22.2% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 92.3% | Tragic 77.8% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 59.0% | Tragic 41.6% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 22.2% | Tragic 13.7% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.4% | Tragic 4.2% |
Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Dominica Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Dominica communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.7% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 67.0%), master's degree (11.4% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 10.7%), and doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 9.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.4% compared to 97.2%, a difference of 1.2%), kindergarten (98.4% compared to 97.1%, a difference of 1.3%), and 1st grade (98.3% compared to 97.1%, a difference of 1.3%).
Education Level Metric | Chickasaw | Immigrants from Dominica |
No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.7% | Tragic 2.8% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.4% | Tragic 97.2% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.4% | Tragic 97.1% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.3% | Tragic 97.1% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.3% | Tragic 97.0% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.2% | Tragic 96.9% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 98.0% | Tragic 96.5% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 97.9% | Tragic 96.2% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 97.6% | Tragic 95.7% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 96.7% | Tragic 94.5% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 96.4% | Tragic 94.0% |
9th Grade | Exceptional 95.5% | Tragic 92.7% |
10th Grade | Excellent 94.1% | Tragic 91.1% |
11th Grade | Fair 92.3% | Tragic 89.5% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Tragic 90.3% | Tragic 87.7% |
High School Diploma | Poor 88.4% | Tragic 85.2% |
GED/Equivalency | Tragic 83.8% | Tragic 81.1% |
College, Under 1 year | Tragic 60.4% | Tragic 57.9% |
College, 1 year or more | Tragic 53.3% | Tragic 52.5% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 38.6% | Tragic 40.5% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 30.4% | Tragic 32.5% |
Master's Degree | Tragic 11.4% | Tragic 12.6% |
Professional Degree | Tragic 3.4% | Tragic 3.6% |
Doctorate Degree | Tragic 1.5% | Tragic 1.4% |
Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Dominica Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Dominica communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (4.5% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 69.3%), disability age 18 to 34 (9.0% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 41.5%), and male disability (15.1% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 29.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.5% compared to 18.6%, a difference of 0.35%), self-care disability (2.9% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 0.38%), and disability age over 75 (51.2% compared to 49.1%, a difference of 4.2%).
Disability Metric | Chickasaw | Immigrants from Dominica |
Disability | Tragic 15.2% | Tragic 12.4% |
Males | Tragic 15.1% | Tragic 11.7% |
Females | Tragic 15.2% | Tragic 13.0% |
Age | Under 5 years | Tragic 1.7% | Tragic 1.4% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 6.8% | Tragic 6.3% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 9.0% | Exceptional 6.3% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 16.1% | Tragic 12.7% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 30.2% | Tragic 25.7% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 51.2% | Tragic 49.1% |
Vision | Tragic 3.2% | Tragic 2.5% |
Hearing | Tragic 4.5% | Exceptional 2.6% |
Cognitive | Tragic 18.5% | Tragic 18.6% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 8.0% | Tragic 6.9% |
Self-Care | Tragic 2.9% | Tragic 2.8% |