Chickasaw vs Mexican Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,486,855 people shows a moderate negative correlation between the proportion of Mexicans within Chickasaw communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.449. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chickasaw within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.411% in Mexicans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chickasaw corresponds to a decrease of 411.2 Mexicans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Mexican communities in the United States are seen in householder income under 25 years ($44,763 compared to $49,989, a difference of 11.7%), median household income ($70,005 compared to $74,399, a difference of 6.3%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($82,193 compared to $86,816, a difference of 5.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median family income ($85,356 compared to $85,618, a difference of 0.31%), householder income over 65 years ($53,732 compared to $53,897, a difference of 0.31%), and median earnings ($40,672 compared to $39,834, a difference of 2.1%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Mexican communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (5.8% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 24.0%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.6% compared to 14.4%, a difference of 23.5%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.7% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 22.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of child poverty under the age of 5 (21.8% compared to 21.6%, a difference of 0.96%), male poverty (13.5% compared to 13.7%, a difference of 1.4%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (17.0% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 2.6%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Mexican communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.4% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 27.1%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.3% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 24.4%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (4.7% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 23.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.0% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 0.99%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.2% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 1.2%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.9% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 7.0%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Mexican communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.3% compared to 35.6%, a difference of 7.5%), in labor force | age > 16 (62.3% compared to 64.1%, a difference of 2.9%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (76.2% compared to 77.2%, a difference of 1.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (81.9% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 0.0%), in labor force | age 25-29 (81.9% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 0.070%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (74.5% compared to 75.1%, a difference of 0.83%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Mexican communities in the United States are seen in divorced or separated (14.2% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 16.5%), single mother households (7.0% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 13.1%), and family households with children (28.2% compared to 31.4%, a difference of 11.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of births to unmarried women (36.3% compared to 36.9%, a difference of 1.7%), married-couple households (45.9% compared to 47.1%, a difference of 2.7%), and currently married (46.6% compared to 45.2%, a difference of 3.2%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Mexican communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 20.2%), no vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 11.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 24.7%, a difference of 11.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 93.0%, a difference of 0.84%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.0% compared to 61.7%, a difference of 4.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 24.7%, a difference of 11.3%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Mexican communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.7% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 94.5%), doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 28.9%), and professional degree (3.4% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 22.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.4% compared to 96.8%, a difference of 1.7%), kindergarten (98.4% compared to 96.7%, a difference of 1.7%), and 1st grade (98.3% compared to 96.7%, a difference of 1.7%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Mexican communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (4.5% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 40.2%), disability age under 5 (1.7% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 36.2%), and disability age 18 to 34 (9.0% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 31.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (51.2% compared to 51.1%, a difference of 0.14%), cognitive disability (18.5% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 3.7%), and self-care disability (2.9% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 6.8%).