Chickasaw vs Costa Rican Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 102,685,145 people shows a moderate negative correlation between the proportion of Costa Ricans within Chickasaw communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.499. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chickasaw within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.008% in Costa Ricans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chickasaw corresponds to a decrease of 7.8 Costa Ricans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Costa Rican communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($82,193 compared to $102,779, a difference of 25.1%), median household income ($70,005 compared to $87,262, a difference of 24.6%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($77,929 compared to $95,565, a difference of 22.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.2% compared to 25.3%, a difference of 7.4%), median male earnings ($47,832 compared to $54,279, a difference of 13.5%), and median earnings ($40,672 compared to $46,645, a difference of 14.7%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Costa Rican communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 18-24 year olds (24.5% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 30.2%), child poverty under the age of 5 (21.8% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 29.4%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (17.0% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 28.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.7% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 5.9%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.6% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 9.7%), and married-couple family poverty (5.8% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 12.5%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Costa Rican communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.3% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 23.4%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.4% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 17.7%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.3% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 17.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.7% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 1.1%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.4% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 1.7%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.6% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 2.9%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Costa Rican communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.3% compared to 36.3%, a difference of 5.6%), in labor force | age > 16 (62.3% compared to 65.6%, a difference of 5.3%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (79.0% compared to 82.8%, a difference of 4.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (74.5% compared to 75.2%, a difference of 1.0%), in labor force | age 30-34 (81.9% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 3.2%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (81.9% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 3.8%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Costa Rican communities in the United States are seen in divorced or separated (14.2% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 18.0%), single father households (2.8% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 17.2%), and births to unmarried women (36.3% compared to 32.7%, a difference of 11.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (46.6% compared to 46.5%, a difference of 0.15%), family households with children (28.2% compared to 28.4%, a difference of 0.53%), and average family size (3.19 compared to 3.26, a difference of 2.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Costa Rican communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 21.3%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 9.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 20.6%, a difference of 8.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 90.5%, a difference of 1.9%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.0% compared to 56.9%, a difference of 3.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 20.6%, a difference of 8.0%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Costa Rican communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.4% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 33.0%), master's degree (11.4% compared to 15.0%, a difference of 31.0%), and no schooling completed (1.7% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 30.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of high school diploma (88.4% compared to 88.4%, a difference of 0.050%), 12th grade, no diploma (90.3% compared to 90.5%, a difference of 0.22%), and 11th grade (92.3% compared to 91.9%, a difference of 0.48%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Costa Rican communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (4.5% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 52.7%), disability age 35 to 64 (16.1% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 50.1%), and vision disability (3.2% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 45.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.5% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 8.6%), disability age over 75 (51.2% compared to 46.9%, a difference of 9.2%), and self-care disability (2.9% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 17.9%).