Immigrants from Syria vs Immigrants from China Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 170,135,367 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from China within Immigrant from Syria communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.333. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Syria within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.278% in Immigrants from China. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Syria corresponds to a decrease of 277.6 Immigrants from China.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Syria and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($96,789 compared to $119,756, a difference of 23.7%), per capita income ($45,218 compared to $54,264, a difference of 20.0%), and median household income ($88,792 compared to $105,335, a difference of 18.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (26.4% compared to 26.7%, a difference of 1.2%), householder income over 65 years ($62,303 compared to $69,174, a difference of 11.0%), and householder income under 25 years ($51,494 compared to $57,931, a difference of 12.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Syria and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in child poverty among girls under 16 (16.6% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 23.6%), child poverty under the age of 5 (16.8% compared to 13.6%, a difference of 23.5%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (16.4% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 23.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.2% compared to 20.2%, a difference of 4.9%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.9% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 5.4%), and male poverty (11.3% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 5.9%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Syria and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.8% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 25.8%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.1% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 17.7%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.7% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 16.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.0% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 0.44%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.3% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 0.97%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.5% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Syria and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.2% compared to 31.1%, a difference of 12.9%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.0% compared to 71.1%, a difference of 4.1%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (82.3% compared to 83.2%, a difference of 1.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (65.3% compared to 65.4%, a difference of 0.10%), in labor force | age 20-64 (79.4% compared to 79.7%, a difference of 0.33%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.3% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 0.36%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Syria and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.3% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 22.6%), single mother households (6.2% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 22.2%), and births to unmarried women (29.4% compared to 24.7%, a difference of 19.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (65.2% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 0.75%), average family size (3.26 compared to 3.23, a difference of 1.0%), and currently married (46.8% compared to 47.9%, a difference of 2.3%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Syria and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.6% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 57.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.2% compared to 51.5%, a difference of 9.1%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (90.4% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 6.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4 or more vehicles in household (6.3% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 5.1%), 3 or more vehicles in household (19.4% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 6.3%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (90.4% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 6.4%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Syria and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.9% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 58.5%), professional degree (4.9% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 36.9%), and master's degree (16.2% compared to 21.2%, a difference of 30.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 11th grade (92.3% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 0.070%), 12th grade, no diploma (91.1% compared to 91.3%, a difference of 0.26%), and 9th grade (94.5% compared to 94.3%, a difference of 0.27%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Syria and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (10.7% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 22.8%), disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 0.96%, a difference of 17.6%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.2% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 14.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.2% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 1.7%), disability age over 75 (47.8% compared to 46.3%, a difference of 3.1%), and hearing disability (2.9% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 9.3%).