Chickasaw vs Soviet Union Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 35,396,656 people shows a perfect positive correlation between the proportion of Soviet Union within Chickasaw communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 1.000. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chickasaw within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.034% in Soviet Union. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chickasaw corresponds to an increase of 34.0 Soviet Union.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Soviet Union communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($36,475 compared to $54,202, a difference of 48.6%), median family income ($85,356 compared to $119,262, a difference of 39.7%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($77,929 compared to $108,457, a difference of 39.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.2% compared to 24.2%, a difference of 12.2%), householder income over 65 years ($53,732 compared to $62,848, a difference of 17.0%), and householder income under 25 years ($44,763 compared to $55,340, a difference of 23.6%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Soviet Union communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (21.8% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 48.6%), single male poverty (16.3% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 42.3%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (17.0% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 40.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.7% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 17.4%), receiving food stamps (13.1% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 18.1%), and married-couple family poverty (5.8% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 18.8%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Soviet Union communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.0% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 37.2%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.3% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 25.1%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.2% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 22.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (16.7% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 0.72%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.9% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 2.3%), and female unemployment (5.1% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 4.4%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Soviet Union communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.3% compared to 31.4%, a difference of 22.0%), in labor force | age 20-64 (76.2% compared to 80.2%, a difference of 5.3%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (80.9% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 5.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (74.5% compared to 72.3%, a difference of 3.0%), in labor force | age 25-29 (81.9% compared to 85.3%, a difference of 4.2%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (81.9% compared to 85.5%, a difference of 4.3%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Soviet Union communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.8% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 53.3%), births to unmarried women (36.3% compared to 26.3%, a difference of 38.0%), and single mother households (7.0% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 37.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (46.6% compared to 46.2%, a difference of 0.90%), average family size (3.19 compared to 3.11, a difference of 2.4%), and married-couple households (45.9% compared to 44.6%, a difference of 2.9%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Soviet Union communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 121.8%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 68.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 56.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 82.7%, a difference of 11.6%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.0% compared to 45.7%, a difference of 29.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 56.6%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Soviet Union communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.4% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 95.3%), master's degree (11.4% compared to 20.5%, a difference of 79.7%), and doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 64.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 9th grade (95.5% compared to 95.4%, a difference of 0.060%), 8th grade (96.4% compared to 96.1%, a difference of 0.32%), and nursery school (98.4% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.34%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Soviet Union communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.7% compared to 0.95%, a difference of 84.0%), disability age 35 to 64 (16.1% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 74.2%), and disability age 18 to 34 (9.0% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 56.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (51.2% compared to 46.2%, a difference of 10.9%), cognitive disability (18.5% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 12.0%), and self-care disability (2.9% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 14.2%).