Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Kenya Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 98,533,886 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Kenya within Chickasaw communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.232. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chickasaw within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.005% in Immigrants from Kenya. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chickasaw corresponds to a decrease of 5.4 Immigrants from Kenya.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Kenya communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($82,193 compared to $97,964, a difference of 19.2%), median household income ($70,005 compared to $83,068, a difference of 18.7%), and median family income ($85,356 compared to $100,679, a difference of 17.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($44,763 compared to $49,633, a difference of 10.9%), householder income over 65 years ($53,732 compared to $59,710, a difference of 11.1%), and wage/income gap (27.2% compared to 24.4%, a difference of 11.4%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Kenya communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (16.3% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 30.9%), single father poverty (19.0% compared to 15.0%, a difference of 26.5%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (17.0% compared to 13.8%, a difference of 23.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.7% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 1.4%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.6% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 2.6%), and receiving food stamps (13.1% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 11.0%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Kenya communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.0% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 23.4%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.3% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 20.3%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 19.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.2% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 0.020%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 0.32%), and male unemployment (5.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 0.50%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Kenya communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (62.3% compared to 67.6%, a difference of 8.5%), in labor force | age 20-64 (76.2% compared to 80.7%, a difference of 6.0%), and in labor force | age 16-19 (38.3% compared to 40.5%, a difference of 5.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (74.5% compared to 77.0%, a difference of 3.4%), in labor force | age 25-29 (81.9% compared to 85.4%, a difference of 4.4%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (81.9% compared to 85.5%, a difference of 4.4%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Kenya communities in the United States are seen in divorced or separated (14.2% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 16.2%), single father households (2.8% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 14.8%), and births to unmarried women (36.3% compared to 32.1%, a difference of 13.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (28.2% compared to 28.1%, a difference of 0.35%), average family size (3.19 compared to 3.21, a difference of 0.61%), and single mother households (7.0% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 0.99%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Kenya communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 24.8%), no vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 22.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 18.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 90.4%, a difference of 2.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.0% compared to 55.1%, a difference of 7.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 18.2%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Kenya communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (11.4% compared to 15.3%, a difference of 33.5%), professional degree (3.4% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 30.3%), and bachelor's degree (30.4% compared to 38.8%, a difference of 27.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 10th grade (94.1% compared to 94.0%, a difference of 0.10%), 9th grade (95.5% compared to 95.0%, a difference of 0.44%), and nursery school (98.4% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.50%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Kenya communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (4.5% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 56.1%), vision disability (3.2% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 51.7%), and disability age under 5 (1.7% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 40.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.5% compared to 18.3%, a difference of 0.99%), disability age over 75 (51.2% compared to 47.6%, a difference of 7.7%), and disability age 5 to 17 (6.8% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 17.3%).