Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Syria Community Comparison
COMPARE
Chickasaw
Immigrants from Syria
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Chickasaw
Immigrants from Syria
3,663
SOCIAL INDEX
34.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
212th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
5,570
SOCIAL INDEX
53.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
173rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Immigrants from Syria Integration in Chickasaw Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 85,511,930 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Syria within Chickasaw communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.715. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chickasaw within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.044% in Immigrants from Syria. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chickasaw corresponds to an increase of 44.4 Immigrants from Syria.
Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Syria Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Syria communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($82,193 compared to $104,858, a difference of 27.6%), median household income ($70,005 compared to $88,792, a difference of 26.8%), and median family income ($85,356 compared to $106,118, a difference of 24.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.2% compared to 26.4%, a difference of 3.0%), householder income under 25 years ($44,763 compared to $51,494, a difference of 15.0%), and householder income over 65 years ($53,732 compared to $62,303, a difference of 16.0%).
Income Metric | Chickasaw | Immigrants from Syria |
Per Capita Income | Tragic $36,475 | Excellent $45,218 |
Median Family Income | Tragic $85,356 | Excellent $106,118 |
Median Household Income | Tragic $70,005 | Exceptional $88,792 |
Median Earnings | Tragic $40,672 | Exceptional $48,375 |
Median Male Earnings | Tragic $47,832 | Exceptional $56,830 |
Median Female Earnings | Tragic $34,414 | Excellent $40,499 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Tragic $44,763 | Poor $51,494 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Tragic $77,929 | Good $96,789 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Tragic $82,193 | Exceptional $104,858 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Tragic $53,732 | Excellent $62,303 |
Wage/Income Gap | Tragic 27.2% | Poor 26.4% |
Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Syria Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Syria communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 25-34 year olds (17.0% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 33.2%), single female poverty (26.3% compared to 19.9%, a difference of 31.9%), and single male poverty (16.3% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 31.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.7% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 1.9%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.6% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 4.4%), and married-couple family poverty (5.8% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 5.7%).
Poverty Metric | Chickasaw | Immigrants from Syria |
Poverty | Tragic 14.7% | Average 12.3% |
Families | Tragic 10.8% | Average 9.0% |
Males | Tragic 13.5% | Average 11.3% |
Females | Tragic 15.9% | Average 13.5% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 24.5% | Exceptional 19.2% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 17.0% | Exceptional 12.8% |
Children Under 5 years | Tragic 21.8% | Good 16.8% |
Children Under 16 years | Tragic 19.5% | Average 16.4% |
Boys Under 16 years | Tragic 19.8% | Average 16.5% |
Girls Under 16 years | Tragic 19.6% | Average 16.6% |
Single Males | Tragic 16.3% | Exceptional 12.4% |
Single Females | Tragic 26.3% | Exceptional 19.9% |
Single Fathers | Tragic 19.0% | Excellent 15.9% |
Single Mothers | Tragic 34.4% | Exceptional 28.3% |
Married Couples | Tragic 5.8% | Poor 5.5% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Good 10.7% | Average 10.9% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Exceptional 11.6% | Average 12.2% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Tragic 13.1% | Average 11.7% |
Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Syria Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Syria communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.4% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 19.4%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (4.7% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 16.7%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.0% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 14.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.7% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 1.2%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.9% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 2.8%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.8% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 4.3%).
Unemployment Metric | Chickasaw | Immigrants from Syria |
Unemployment | Exceptional 5.0% | Tragic 5.5% |
Males | Excellent 5.2% | Tragic 5.5% |
Females | Excellent 5.1% | Tragic 5.6% |
Youth < 25 | Exceptional 11.2% | Tragic 12.3% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Exceptional 16.7% | Poor 18.0% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Exceptional 9.9% | Tragic 10.8% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Fair 6.7% | Poor 6.8% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Tragic 6.2% | Tragic 5.7% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 4.9% | Fair 4.8% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Exceptional 4.2% | Tragic 4.8% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Good 4.8% | Tragic 5.0% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Exceptional 4.3% | Exceptional 4.8% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 4.7% | Tragic 5.5% |
Seniors > 65 | Exceptional 4.4% | Tragic 5.3% |
Seniors > 75 | Exceptional 7.3% | Exceptional 8.0% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Tragic 9.0% | Poor 7.8% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Exceptional 8.6% | Fair 9.1% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Good 5.4% | Tragic 5.7% |
Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Syria Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Syria communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.3% compared to 35.2%, a difference of 9.0%), in labor force | age > 16 (62.3% compared to 65.3%, a difference of 4.9%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (76.2% compared to 79.4%, a difference of 4.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (74.5% compared to 74.0%, a difference of 0.66%), in labor force | age 25-29 (81.9% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 3.0%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (81.9% compared to 84.5%, a difference of 3.1%).
Labor Participation Metric | Chickasaw | Immigrants from Syria |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 62.3% | Good 65.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Tragic 76.2% | Fair 79.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 38.3% | Tragic 35.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Poor 74.5% | Tragic 74.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Tragic 81.9% | Poor 84.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 81.9% | Fair 84.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 80.9% | Tragic 83.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 79.0% | Tragic 82.3% |
Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Syria Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Syria communities in the United States are seen in divorced or separated (14.2% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 24.2%), births to unmarried women (36.3% compared to 29.4%, a difference of 23.6%), and single father households (2.8% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 21.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (46.6% compared to 46.8%, a difference of 0.42%), family households with children (28.2% compared to 28.4%, a difference of 0.52%), and family households (64.4% compared to 65.2%, a difference of 1.2%).
Family Structure Metric | Chickasaw | Immigrants from Syria |
Family Households | Good 64.4% | Exceptional 65.2% |
Family Households with Children | Exceptional 28.2% | Exceptional 28.4% |
Married-couple Households | Fair 45.9% | Excellent 47.1% |
Average Family Size | Tragic 3.19 | Exceptional 3.26 |
Single Father Households | Tragic 2.8% | Excellent 2.3% |
Single Mother Households | Tragic 7.0% | Good 6.2% |
Currently Married | Average 46.6% | Average 46.8% |
Divorced or Separated | Tragic 14.2% | Exceptional 11.4% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Tragic 36.3% | Exceptional 29.4% |
Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Syria Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Syria communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 22.8%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 17.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 19.4%, a difference of 14.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 90.4%, a difference of 2.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.0% compared to 56.2%, a difference of 5.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 19.4%, a difference of 14.7%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Chickasaw | Immigrants from Syria |
No Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.9% | Excellent 9.6% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 92.3% | Excellent 90.4% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 59.0% | Excellent 56.2% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 22.2% | Average 19.4% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.4% | Average 6.3% |
Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Syria Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Syria communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.4% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 46.3%), master's degree (11.4% compared to 16.2%, a difference of 41.6%), and no schooling completed (1.7% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 34.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 11th grade (92.3% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 0.010%), high school diploma (88.4% compared to 89.0%, a difference of 0.64%), and nursery school (98.4% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.65%).
Education Level Metric | Chickasaw | Immigrants from Syria |
No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.7% | Tragic 2.3% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.4% | Tragic 97.7% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.4% | Tragic 97.7% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.3% | Tragic 97.7% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.3% | Tragic 97.6% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.2% | Tragic 97.5% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 98.0% | Tragic 97.2% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 97.9% | Tragic 97.1% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 97.6% | Tragic 96.7% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 96.7% | Tragic 95.7% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 96.4% | Tragic 95.3% |
9th Grade | Exceptional 95.5% | Poor 94.5% |
10th Grade | Excellent 94.1% | Poor 93.4% |
11th Grade | Fair 92.3% | Fair 92.3% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Tragic 90.3% | Average 91.1% |
High School Diploma | Poor 88.4% | Fair 89.0% |
GED/Equivalency | Tragic 83.8% | Good 86.1% |
College, Under 1 year | Tragic 60.4% | Excellent 66.9% |
College, 1 year or more | Tragic 53.3% | Exceptional 61.3% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 38.6% | Exceptional 48.5% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 30.4% | Exceptional 40.5% |
Master's Degree | Tragic 11.4% | Exceptional 16.2% |
Professional Degree | Tragic 3.4% | Exceptional 4.9% |
Doctorate Degree | Tragic 1.5% | Excellent 1.9% |
Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Syria Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Syria communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (4.5% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 56.1%), vision disability (3.2% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 54.6%), and disability age under 5 (1.7% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 53.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (51.2% compared to 47.8%, a difference of 7.2%), cognitive disability (18.5% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 7.5%), and self-care disability (2.9% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 9.9%).
Disability Metric | Chickasaw | Immigrants from Syria |
Disability | Tragic 15.2% | Exceptional 11.3% |
Males | Tragic 15.1% | Exceptional 10.8% |
Females | Tragic 15.2% | Exceptional 11.9% |
Age | Under 5 years | Tragic 1.7% | Exceptional 1.1% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 6.8% | Exceptional 5.2% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 9.0% | Exceptional 6.2% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 16.1% | Exceptional 10.7% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 30.2% | Excellent 22.7% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 51.2% | Poor 47.8% |
Vision | Tragic 3.2% | Exceptional 2.1% |
Hearing | Tragic 4.5% | Excellent 2.9% |
Cognitive | Tragic 18.5% | Good 17.2% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 8.0% | Excellent 6.0% |
Self-Care | Tragic 2.9% | Tragic 2.6% |