Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Syria Community Comparison

COMPARE

Chickasaw
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Immigrants from Syria
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Chickasaw

Immigrants from Syria

Fair
Average
3,663
SOCIAL INDEX
34.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
212th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
5,570
SOCIAL INDEX
53.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
173rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Immigrants from Syria Integration in Chickasaw Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 85,511,930 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Syria within Chickasaw communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.715. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chickasaw within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.044% in Immigrants from Syria. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chickasaw corresponds to an increase of 44.4 Immigrants from Syria.
Chickasaw Integration in Immigrants from Syria Communities

Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Syria Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Syria communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($82,193 compared to $104,858, a difference of 27.6%), median household income ($70,005 compared to $88,792, a difference of 26.8%), and median family income ($85,356 compared to $106,118, a difference of 24.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.2% compared to 26.4%, a difference of 3.0%), householder income under 25 years ($44,763 compared to $51,494, a difference of 15.0%), and householder income over 65 years ($53,732 compared to $62,303, a difference of 16.0%).
Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Syria Income
Income MetricChickasawImmigrants from Syria
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$36,475
Excellent
$45,218
Median Family Income
Tragic
$85,356
Excellent
$106,118
Median Household Income
Tragic
$70,005
Exceptional
$88,792
Median Earnings
Tragic
$40,672
Exceptional
$48,375
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$47,832
Exceptional
$56,830
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$34,414
Excellent
$40,499
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$44,763
Poor
$51,494
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$77,929
Good
$96,789
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$82,193
Exceptional
$104,858
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$53,732
Excellent
$62,303
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
27.2%
Poor
26.4%

Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Syria Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Syria communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 25-34 year olds (17.0% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 33.2%), single female poverty (26.3% compared to 19.9%, a difference of 31.9%), and single male poverty (16.3% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 31.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.7% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 1.9%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.6% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 4.4%), and married-couple family poverty (5.8% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 5.7%).
Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Syria Poverty
Poverty MetricChickasawImmigrants from Syria
Poverty
Tragic
14.7%
Average
12.3%
Families
Tragic
10.8%
Average
9.0%
Males
Tragic
13.5%
Average
11.3%
Females
Tragic
15.9%
Average
13.5%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
24.5%
Exceptional
19.2%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
17.0%
Exceptional
12.8%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
21.8%
Good
16.8%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
19.5%
Average
16.4%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
19.8%
Average
16.5%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
19.6%
Average
16.6%
Single Males
Tragic
16.3%
Exceptional
12.4%
Single Females
Tragic
26.3%
Exceptional
19.9%
Single Fathers
Tragic
19.0%
Excellent
15.9%
Single Mothers
Tragic
34.4%
Exceptional
28.3%
Married Couples
Tragic
5.8%
Poor
5.5%
Seniors Over 65 years
Good
10.7%
Average
10.9%
Seniors Over 75 years
Exceptional
11.6%
Average
12.2%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
13.1%
Average
11.7%

Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Syria Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Syria communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.4% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 19.4%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (4.7% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 16.7%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.0% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 14.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.7% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 1.2%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.9% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 2.8%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.8% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 4.3%).
Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Syria Unemployment
Unemployment MetricChickasawImmigrants from Syria
Unemployment
Exceptional
5.0%
Tragic
5.5%
Males
Excellent
5.2%
Tragic
5.5%
Females
Excellent
5.1%
Tragic
5.6%
Youth < 25
Exceptional
11.2%
Tragic
12.3%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Exceptional
16.7%
Poor
18.0%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
9.9%
Tragic
10.8%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Fair
6.7%
Poor
6.8%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
6.2%
Tragic
5.7%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
4.9%
Fair
4.8%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
4.2%
Tragic
4.8%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Good
4.8%
Tragic
5.0%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.3%
Exceptional
4.8%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
4.7%
Tragic
5.5%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
4.4%
Tragic
5.3%
Seniors > 75
Exceptional
7.3%
Exceptional
8.0%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
9.0%
Poor
7.8%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
8.6%
Fair
9.1%
Women w/ Children < 18
Good
5.4%
Tragic
5.7%

Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Syria Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Syria communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.3% compared to 35.2%, a difference of 9.0%), in labor force | age > 16 (62.3% compared to 65.3%, a difference of 4.9%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (76.2% compared to 79.4%, a difference of 4.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (74.5% compared to 74.0%, a difference of 0.66%), in labor force | age 25-29 (81.9% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 3.0%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (81.9% compared to 84.5%, a difference of 3.1%).
Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Syria Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricChickasawImmigrants from Syria
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
62.3%
Good
65.3%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
76.2%
Fair
79.4%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
38.3%
Tragic
35.2%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Poor
74.5%
Tragic
74.0%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
81.9%
Poor
84.3%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
81.9%
Fair
84.5%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
80.9%
Tragic
83.9%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
79.0%
Tragic
82.3%

Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Syria Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Syria communities in the United States are seen in divorced or separated (14.2% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 24.2%), births to unmarried women (36.3% compared to 29.4%, a difference of 23.6%), and single father households (2.8% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 21.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (46.6% compared to 46.8%, a difference of 0.42%), family households with children (28.2% compared to 28.4%, a difference of 0.52%), and family households (64.4% compared to 65.2%, a difference of 1.2%).
Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Syria Family Structure
Family Structure MetricChickasawImmigrants from Syria
Family Households
Good
64.4%
Exceptional
65.2%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
28.2%
Exceptional
28.4%
Married-couple Households
Fair
45.9%
Excellent
47.1%
Average Family Size
Tragic
3.19
Exceptional
3.26
Single Father Households
Tragic
2.8%
Excellent
2.3%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
7.0%
Good
6.2%
Currently Married
Average
46.6%
Average
46.8%
Divorced or Separated
Tragic
14.2%
Exceptional
11.4%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
36.3%
Exceptional
29.4%

Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Syria Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Syria communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 22.8%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 17.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 19.4%, a difference of 14.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 90.4%, a difference of 2.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.0% compared to 56.2%, a difference of 5.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 19.4%, a difference of 14.7%).
Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Syria Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricChickasawImmigrants from Syria
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.9%
Excellent
9.6%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
92.3%
Excellent
90.4%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
59.0%
Excellent
56.2%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
22.2%
Average
19.4%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.4%
Average
6.3%

Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Syria Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Syria communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.4% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 46.3%), master's degree (11.4% compared to 16.2%, a difference of 41.6%), and no schooling completed (1.7% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 34.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 11th grade (92.3% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 0.010%), high school diploma (88.4% compared to 89.0%, a difference of 0.64%), and nursery school (98.4% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.65%).
Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Syria Education Level
Education Level MetricChickasawImmigrants from Syria
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.7%
Tragic
2.3%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.4%
Tragic
97.7%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.4%
Tragic
97.7%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Tragic
97.7%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Tragic
97.6%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Tragic
97.5%
4th Grade
Exceptional
98.0%
Tragic
97.2%
5th Grade
Exceptional
97.9%
Tragic
97.1%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.6%
Tragic
96.7%
7th Grade
Exceptional
96.7%
Tragic
95.7%
8th Grade
Exceptional
96.4%
Tragic
95.3%
9th Grade
Exceptional
95.5%
Poor
94.5%
10th Grade
Excellent
94.1%
Poor
93.4%
11th Grade
Fair
92.3%
Fair
92.3%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
90.3%
Average
91.1%
High School Diploma
Poor
88.4%
Fair
89.0%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
83.8%
Good
86.1%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
60.4%
Excellent
66.9%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
53.3%
Exceptional
61.3%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
38.6%
Exceptional
48.5%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
30.4%
Exceptional
40.5%
Master's Degree
Tragic
11.4%
Exceptional
16.2%
Professional Degree
Tragic
3.4%
Exceptional
4.9%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.5%
Excellent
1.9%

Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Syria Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Syria communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (4.5% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 56.1%), vision disability (3.2% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 54.6%), and disability age under 5 (1.7% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 53.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (51.2% compared to 47.8%, a difference of 7.2%), cognitive disability (18.5% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 7.5%), and self-care disability (2.9% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 9.9%).
Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Syria Disability
Disability MetricChickasawImmigrants from Syria
Disability
Tragic
15.2%
Exceptional
11.3%
Males
Tragic
15.1%
Exceptional
10.8%
Females
Tragic
15.2%
Exceptional
11.9%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.7%
Exceptional
1.1%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
6.8%
Exceptional
5.2%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
9.0%
Exceptional
6.2%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
16.1%
Exceptional
10.7%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
30.2%
Excellent
22.7%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
51.2%
Poor
47.8%
Vision
Tragic
3.2%
Exceptional
2.1%
Hearing
Tragic
4.5%
Excellent
2.9%
Cognitive
Tragic
18.5%
Good
17.2%
Ambulatory
Tragic
8.0%
Excellent
6.0%
Self-Care
Tragic
2.9%
Tragic
2.6%