Chickasaw vs Armenian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 113,424,142 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Armenians within Chickasaw communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.641. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chickasaw within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.025% in Armenians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chickasaw corresponds to an increase of 24.8 Armenians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Armenian communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($77,929 compared to $103,248, a difference of 32.5%), per capita income ($36,475 compared to $48,287, a difference of 32.4%), and median household income ($70,005 compared to $91,807, a difference of 31.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.2% compared to 24.8%, a difference of 9.6%), householder income over 65 years ($53,732 compared to $61,656, a difference of 14.7%), and householder income under 25 years ($44,763 compared to $53,179, a difference of 18.8%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Armenian communities in the United States are seen in single female poverty (26.3% compared to 18.3%, a difference of 43.4%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (17.0% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 39.9%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (21.8% compared to 15.8%, a difference of 37.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple family poverty (5.8% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 5.1%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.7% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 15.3%), and receiving food stamps (13.1% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 17.6%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Armenian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.4% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 25.8%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.0% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 23.7%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (4.7% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 23.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.3% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 1.4%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.2% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 1.8%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.6% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 3.6%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Armenian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.3% compared to 32.9%, a difference of 16.4%), in labor force | age 45-54 (79.0% compared to 82.5%, a difference of 4.4%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (76.2% compared to 79.5%, a difference of 4.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (74.5% compared to 72.5%, a difference of 2.6%), in labor force | age 25-29 (81.9% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 3.6%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (81.9% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 3.8%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Armenian communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (36.3% compared to 26.2%, a difference of 38.5%), single mother households (7.0% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 34.6%), and single father households (2.8% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 31.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.4% compared to 64.4%, a difference of 0.080%), currently married (46.6% compared to 46.8%, a difference of 0.38%), and average family size (3.19 compared to 3.25, a difference of 1.9%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Armenian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 19.2%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 12.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 19.8%, a difference of 12.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 90.7%, a difference of 1.7%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.0% compared to 56.3%, a difference of 4.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 19.8%, a difference of 12.2%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Armenian communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.4% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 58.9%), master's degree (11.4% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 47.0%), and no schooling completed (1.7% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 45.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of high school diploma (88.4% compared to 88.6%, a difference of 0.21%), 12th grade, no diploma (90.3% compared to 90.6%, a difference of 0.30%), and 11th grade (92.3% compared to 91.7%, a difference of 0.67%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Armenian communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.7% compared to 1.0%, a difference of 68.8%), disability age 35 to 64 (16.1% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 62.9%), and vision disability (3.2% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 58.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (51.2% compared to 50.0%, a difference of 2.3%), cognitive disability (18.5% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 7.7%), and self-care disability (2.9% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 19.1%).