Chickasaw vs Italian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,505,111 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Italians within Chickasaw communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.222. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chickasaw within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.045% in Italians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chickasaw corresponds to a decrease of 45.3 Italians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Italian communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($82,193 compared to $110,224, a difference of 34.1%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($77,929 compared to $104,215, a difference of 33.7%), and median household income ($70,005 compared to $92,475, a difference of 32.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.2% compared to 28.1%, a difference of 3.5%), householder income over 65 years ($53,732 compared to $63,885, a difference of 18.9%), and householder income under 25 years ($44,763 compared to $53,426, a difference of 19.4%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Italian communities in the United States are seen in family poverty (10.8% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 46.5%), married-couple family poverty (5.8% compared to 4.0%, a difference of 43.4%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (21.8% compared to 15.5%, a difference of 40.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (19.0% compared to 17.5%, a difference of 8.0%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.6% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 8.2%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.7% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 14.9%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Italian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.3% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 36.2%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.4% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 19.0%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (4.7% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 16.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.8% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 0.050%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.7% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 0.16%), and male unemployment (5.2% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 1.7%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Italian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 45-54 (79.0% compared to 83.3%, a difference of 5.4%), in labor force | age 35-44 (80.9% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 5.1%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (76.2% compared to 79.9%, a difference of 4.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (74.5% compared to 76.5%, a difference of 2.8%), in labor force | age > 16 (62.3% compared to 64.6%, a difference of 3.6%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (81.9% compared to 85.4%, a difference of 4.3%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Italian communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.8% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 27.2%), single mother households (7.0% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 26.1%), and divorced or separated (14.2% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 19.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.4% compared to 64.8%, a difference of 0.66%), average family size (3.19 compared to 3.12, a difference of 2.2%), and currently married (46.6% compared to 48.8%, a difference of 4.8%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Italian communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 12.7%), no vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 9.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 20.6%, a difference of 7.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 0.060%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.0% compared to 58.4%, a difference of 0.96%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 20.6%, a difference of 7.9%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Italian communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (11.4% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 43.3%), professional degree (3.4% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 41.7%), and bachelor's degree (30.4% compared to 40.1%, a difference of 31.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.4% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.14%), kindergarten (98.4% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.14%), and 1st grade (98.3% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.14%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Italian communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (3.2% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 50.0%), disability age 35 to 64 (16.1% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 43.6%), and disability age 65 to 74 (30.2% compared to 22.0%, a difference of 37.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age under 5 (1.7% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 12.0%), disability age over 75 (51.2% compared to 45.6%, a difference of 12.4%), and cognitive disability (18.5% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 12.7%).