Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Haiti Community Comparison

COMPARE

Chickasaw
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Immigrants from Haiti
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Chickasaw

Immigrants from Haiti

Fair
Poor
3,663
SOCIAL INDEX
34.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
212th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
1,401
SOCIAL INDEX
11.6/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
310th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Immigrants from Haiti Integration in Chickasaw Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 84,858,027 people shows a substantial negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Haiti within Chickasaw communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.541. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chickasaw within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.074% in Immigrants from Haiti. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chickasaw corresponds to a decrease of 74.4 Immigrants from Haiti.
Chickasaw Integration in Immigrants from Haiti Communities

Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Haiti Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Haiti communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (27.2% compared to 19.2%, a difference of 41.4%), householder income under 25 years ($44,763 compared to $50,398, a difference of 12.6%), and median male earnings ($47,832 compared to $45,266, a difference of 5.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median earnings ($40,672 compared to $40,550, a difference of 0.30%), per capita income ($36,475 compared to $36,849, a difference of 1.0%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($82,193 compared to $83,257, a difference of 1.3%).
Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Haiti Income
Income MetricChickasawImmigrants from Haiti
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$36,475
Tragic
$36,849
Median Family Income
Tragic
$85,356
Tragic
$84,018
Median Household Income
Tragic
$70,005
Tragic
$72,599
Median Earnings
Tragic
$40,672
Tragic
$40,550
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$47,832
Tragic
$45,266
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$34,414
Tragic
$36,203
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$44,763
Tragic
$50,398
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$77,929
Tragic
$79,391
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$82,193
Tragic
$83,257
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$53,732
Tragic
$51,219
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
27.2%
Exceptional
19.2%

Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Haiti Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Haiti communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.6% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 41.9%), receiving food stamps (13.1% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 39.0%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.7% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 37.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty (15.9% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 1.7%), male poverty (13.5% compared to 13.8%, a difference of 1.9%), and poverty (14.7% compared to 15.0%, a difference of 2.1%).
Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Haiti Poverty
Poverty MetricChickasawImmigrants from Haiti
Poverty
Tragic
14.7%
Tragic
15.0%
Families
Tragic
10.8%
Tragic
11.6%
Males
Tragic
13.5%
Tragic
13.8%
Females
Tragic
15.9%
Tragic
16.1%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
24.5%
Exceptional
18.7%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
17.0%
Tragic
15.0%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
21.8%
Tragic
21.3%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
19.5%
Tragic
20.9%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
19.8%
Tragic
21.3%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
19.6%
Tragic
20.6%
Single Males
Tragic
16.3%
Poor
13.1%
Single Females
Tragic
26.3%
Poor
21.5%
Single Fathers
Tragic
19.0%
Tragic
17.2%
Single Mothers
Tragic
34.4%
Poor
29.7%
Married Couples
Tragic
5.8%
Tragic
7.0%
Seniors Over 65 years
Good
10.7%
Tragic
14.7%
Seniors Over 75 years
Exceptional
11.6%
Tragic
16.5%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
13.1%
Tragic
18.2%

Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Haiti Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Haiti communities in the United States are seen in male unemployment (5.2% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 26.2%), unemployment (5.0% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 25.2%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.2% compared to 14.0%, a difference of 25.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.2% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 0.56%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.8% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 2.6%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.0% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 6.2%).
Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Haiti Unemployment
Unemployment MetricChickasawImmigrants from Haiti
Unemployment
Exceptional
5.0%
Tragic
6.3%
Males
Excellent
5.2%
Tragic
6.5%
Females
Excellent
5.1%
Tragic
6.1%
Youth < 25
Exceptional
11.2%
Tragic
14.0%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Exceptional
16.7%
Tragic
20.4%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
9.9%
Tragic
12.4%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Fair
6.7%
Tragic
8.1%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
6.2%
Tragic
6.2%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
4.9%
Tragic
5.5%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
4.2%
Tragic
5.2%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Good
4.8%
Poor
4.9%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.3%
Tragic
5.2%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
4.7%
Tragic
5.6%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
4.4%
Tragic
5.5%
Seniors > 75
Exceptional
7.3%
Fair
8.8%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
9.0%
Tragic
8.4%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
8.6%
Tragic
10.1%
Women w/ Children < 18
Good
5.4%
Tragic
6.4%

Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Haiti Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Haiti communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.3% compared to 33.2%, a difference of 15.5%), in labor force | age 35-44 (80.9% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 5.1%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (79.0% compared to 83.0%, a difference of 5.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (74.5% compared to 73.6%, a difference of 1.2%), in labor force | age 25-29 (81.9% compared to 83.7%, a difference of 2.2%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (81.9% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 2.7%).
Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Haiti Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricChickasawImmigrants from Haiti
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
62.3%
Average
65.1%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
76.2%
Fair
79.4%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
38.3%
Tragic
33.2%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Poor
74.5%
Tragic
73.6%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
81.9%
Tragic
83.7%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
81.9%
Tragic
84.2%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
80.9%
Exceptional
85.0%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
79.0%
Good
83.0%

Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Haiti Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Haiti communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (7.0% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 19.2%), currently married (46.6% compared to 41.0%, a difference of 13.7%), and married-couple households (45.9% compared to 40.9%, a difference of 12.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.4% compared to 65.3%, a difference of 1.4%), family households with children (28.2% compared to 27.2%, a difference of 3.6%), and single father households (2.8% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 5.0%).
Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Haiti Family Structure
Family Structure MetricChickasawImmigrants from Haiti
Family Households
Good
64.4%
Exceptional
65.3%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
28.2%
Fair
27.2%
Married-couple Households
Fair
45.9%
Tragic
40.9%
Average Family Size
Tragic
3.19
Exceptional
3.39
Single Father Households
Tragic
2.8%
Tragic
2.6%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
7.0%
Tragic
8.4%
Currently Married
Average
46.6%
Tragic
41.0%
Divorced or Separated
Tragic
14.2%
Tragic
13.4%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
36.3%
Tragic
38.9%

Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Haiti Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Haiti communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 95.7%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 65.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 46.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 9.0%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.0% compared to 46.5%, a difference of 26.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 46.3%).
Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Haiti Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricChickasawImmigrants from Haiti
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.9%
Tragic
15.4%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
92.3%
Tragic
84.7%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
59.0%
Tragic
46.5%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
22.2%
Tragic
15.2%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.4%
Tragic
4.5%

Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Haiti Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Haiti communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.7% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 77.4%), doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 20.2%), and college, under 1 year (60.4% compared to 56.9%, a difference of 6.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of professional degree (3.4% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 0.31%), bachelor's degree (30.4% compared to 30.6%, a difference of 0.77%), and nursery school (98.4% compared to 97.0%, a difference of 1.4%).
Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Haiti Education Level
Education Level MetricChickasawImmigrants from Haiti
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.7%
Tragic
3.0%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.4%
Tragic
97.0%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.4%
Tragic
97.0%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Tragic
96.9%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Tragic
96.8%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Tragic
96.7%
4th Grade
Exceptional
98.0%
Tragic
96.3%
5th Grade
Exceptional
97.9%
Tragic
96.0%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.6%
Tragic
95.6%
7th Grade
Exceptional
96.7%
Tragic
94.3%
8th Grade
Exceptional
96.4%
Tragic
93.9%
9th Grade
Exceptional
95.5%
Tragic
92.7%
10th Grade
Excellent
94.1%
Tragic
91.4%
11th Grade
Fair
92.3%
Tragic
89.9%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
90.3%
Tragic
88.2%
High School Diploma
Poor
88.4%
Tragic
85.4%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
83.8%
Tragic
81.6%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
60.4%
Tragic
56.9%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
53.3%
Tragic
51.5%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
38.6%
Tragic
39.3%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
30.4%
Tragic
30.6%
Master's Degree
Tragic
11.4%
Tragic
11.8%
Professional Degree
Tragic
3.4%
Tragic
3.4%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.5%
Tragic
1.3%

Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Haiti Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Haiti communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (4.5% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 72.8%), disability age 18 to 34 (9.0% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 50.9%), and disability age 35 to 64 (16.1% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 44.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.5% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 6.3%), disability age over 75 (51.2% compared to 47.3%, a difference of 8.1%), and self-care disability (2.9% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 8.6%).
Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Haiti Disability
Disability MetricChickasawImmigrants from Haiti
Disability
Tragic
15.2%
Average
11.7%
Males
Tragic
15.1%
Good
11.1%
Females
Tragic
15.2%
Average
12.2%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.7%
Average
1.3%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
6.8%
Tragic
5.8%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
9.0%
Exceptional
5.9%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
16.1%
Good
11.1%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
30.2%
Average
23.4%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
51.2%
Average
47.3%
Vision
Tragic
3.2%
Tragic
2.4%
Hearing
Tragic
4.5%
Exceptional
2.6%
Cognitive
Tragic
18.5%
Fair
17.4%
Ambulatory
Tragic
8.0%
Tragic
6.5%
Self-Care
Tragic
2.9%
Tragic
2.6%