Chickasaw vs Kiowa Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 46,864,091 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Kiowa within Chickasaw communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.330. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chickasaw within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.040% in Kiowa. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chickasaw corresponds to an increase of 40.0 Kiowa.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Kiowa communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (27.2% compared to 23.6%, a difference of 15.0%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($82,193 compared to $74,815, a difference of 9.9%), and median household income ($70,005 compared to $65,914, a difference of 6.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($44,763 compared to $44,733, a difference of 0.070%), median female earnings ($34,414 compared to $34,074, a difference of 1.0%), and median earnings ($40,672 compared to $39,232, a difference of 3.7%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Kiowa communities in the United States are seen in child poverty among girls under 16 (19.6% compared to 23.7%, a difference of 20.7%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.7% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 19.6%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (24.5% compared to 29.2%, a difference of 19.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single female poverty (26.3% compared to 26.9%, a difference of 2.6%), single mother poverty (34.4% compared to 35.5%, a difference of 3.0%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.6% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 5.9%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Kiowa communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (16.7% compared to 25.2%, a difference of 51.2%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.3% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 43.4%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.2% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 20.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.9% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 3.4%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.3% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 4.9%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (9.9% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 5.8%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Kiowa communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.3% compared to 37.2%, a difference of 3.0%), in labor force | age 30-34 (81.9% compared to 79.8%, a difference of 2.6%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (80.9% compared to 79.2%, a difference of 2.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (62.3% compared to 62.4%, a difference of 0.19%), in labor force | age 25-29 (81.9% compared to 81.6%, a difference of 0.34%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (79.0% compared to 78.3%, a difference of 1.0%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Kiowa communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (36.3% compared to 43.1%, a difference of 18.9%), married-couple households (45.9% compared to 42.0%, a difference of 9.3%), and currently married (46.6% compared to 43.2%, a difference of 8.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother households (7.0% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 1.4%), single father households (2.8% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 1.4%), and divorced or separated (14.2% compared to 14.5%, a difference of 2.2%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Kiowa communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 46.7%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 19.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 19.5%, a difference of 13.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 88.6%, a difference of 4.2%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.0% compared to 53.9%, a difference of 9.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 19.5%, a difference of 13.8%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Kiowa communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.4% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 9.0%), associate's degree (38.6% compared to 36.5%, a difference of 5.9%), and master's degree (11.4% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 5.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 5th grade (97.9% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.010%), 7th grade (96.7% compared to 96.7%, a difference of 0.010%), and 3rd grade (98.2% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.020%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Kiowa communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.7% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 17.9%), disability age 65 to 74 (30.2% compared to 32.6%, a difference of 7.8%), and disability age 35 to 64 (16.1% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 7.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.5% compared to 18.7%, a difference of 1.2%), disability age 18 to 34 (9.0% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 1.6%), and male disability (15.1% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 2.0%).