Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Spain Community Comparison

COMPARE

Chickasaw
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Immigrants from Spain
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Chickasaw

Immigrants from Spain

Fair
Good
3,663
SOCIAL INDEX
34.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
212th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
7,210
SOCIAL INDEX
69.6/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
128th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Immigrants from Spain Integration in Chickasaw Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 100,142,843 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Spain within Chickasaw communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.661. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chickasaw within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.045% in Immigrants from Spain. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chickasaw corresponds to an increase of 45.4 Immigrants from Spain.
Chickasaw Integration in Immigrants from Spain Communities

Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Spain Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Spain communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($36,475 compared to $50,933, a difference of 39.6%), median family income ($85,356 compared to $113,815, a difference of 33.3%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($77,929 compared to $103,752, a difference of 33.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.2% compared to 26.8%, a difference of 1.5%), householder income over 65 years ($53,732 compared to $63,540, a difference of 18.2%), and householder income under 25 years ($44,763 compared to $53,560, a difference of 19.7%).
Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Spain Income
Income MetricChickasawImmigrants from Spain
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$36,475
Exceptional
$50,933
Median Family Income
Tragic
$85,356
Exceptional
$113,815
Median Household Income
Tragic
$70,005
Exceptional
$92,732
Median Earnings
Tragic
$40,672
Exceptional
$51,092
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$47,832
Exceptional
$60,750
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$34,414
Exceptional
$42,815
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$44,763
Exceptional
$53,560
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$77,929
Exceptional
$103,752
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$82,193
Exceptional
$109,051
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$53,732
Exceptional
$63,540
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
27.2%
Tragic
26.8%

Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Spain Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Spain communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (21.8% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 36.9%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (17.0% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 34.2%), and single female poverty (26.3% compared to 20.2%, a difference of 30.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.7% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 12.8%), single father poverty (19.0% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 13.3%), and married-couple family poverty (5.8% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 15.6%).
Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Spain Poverty
Poverty MetricChickasawImmigrants from Spain
Poverty
Tragic
14.7%
Average
12.3%
Families
Tragic
10.8%
Good
8.6%
Males
Tragic
13.5%
Average
11.1%
Females
Tragic
15.9%
Average
13.4%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
24.5%
Fair
20.4%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
17.0%
Exceptional
12.7%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
21.8%
Exceptional
15.9%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
19.5%
Excellent
15.3%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
19.8%
Excellent
15.6%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
19.6%
Excellent
15.5%
Single Males
Tragic
16.3%
Good
12.7%
Single Females
Tragic
26.3%
Exceptional
20.2%
Single Fathers
Tragic
19.0%
Tragic
16.7%
Single Mothers
Tragic
34.4%
Excellent
28.4%
Married Couples
Tragic
5.8%
Good
5.0%
Seniors Over 65 years
Good
10.7%
Tragic
12.1%
Seniors Over 75 years
Exceptional
11.6%
Tragic
13.7%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
13.1%
Excellent
11.1%

Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Spain Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Spain communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.0% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 25.6%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.3% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 19.5%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.2% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 17.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female unemployment (5.1% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 1.4%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (9.9% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 1.4%), and unemployment (5.0% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 1.5%).
Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Spain Unemployment
Unemployment MetricChickasawImmigrants from Spain
Unemployment
Exceptional
5.0%
Excellent
5.1%
Males
Excellent
5.2%
Exceptional
5.1%
Females
Excellent
5.1%
Good
5.2%
Youth < 25
Exceptional
11.2%
Excellent
11.4%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Exceptional
16.7%
Poor
18.0%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
9.9%
Exceptional
10.1%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Fair
6.7%
Exceptional
6.3%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
6.2%
Excellent
5.3%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
4.9%
Excellent
4.5%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
4.2%
Good
4.5%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Good
4.8%
Exceptional
4.7%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.3%
Tragic
5.2%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
4.7%
Fair
5.4%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
4.4%
Average
5.1%
Seniors > 75
Exceptional
7.3%
Exceptional
7.8%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
9.0%
Exceptional
7.1%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
8.6%
Fair
9.0%
Women w/ Children < 18
Good
5.4%
Fair
5.5%

Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Spain Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Spain communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.3% compared to 33.7%, a difference of 13.8%), in labor force | age > 16 (62.3% compared to 65.8%, a difference of 5.7%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (79.0% compared to 83.0%, a difference of 5.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (74.5% compared to 73.2%, a difference of 1.7%), in labor force | age 25-29 (81.9% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 3.4%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (81.9% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 3.8%).
Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Spain Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricChickasawImmigrants from Spain
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
62.3%
Exceptional
65.8%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
76.2%
Excellent
79.8%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
38.3%
Tragic
33.7%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Poor
74.5%
Tragic
73.2%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
81.9%
Average
84.7%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
81.9%
Exceptional
85.0%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
80.9%
Exceptional
84.7%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
79.0%
Excellent
83.0%

Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Spain Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Spain communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.8% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 33.1%), divorced or separated (14.2% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 21.4%), and births to unmarried women (36.3% compared to 30.3%, a difference of 19.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.19 compared to 3.17, a difference of 0.58%), married-couple households (45.9% compared to 45.3%, a difference of 1.3%), and currently married (46.6% compared to 45.8%, a difference of 1.8%).
Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Spain Family Structure
Family Structure MetricChickasawImmigrants from Spain
Family Households
Good
64.4%
Tragic
62.4%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
28.2%
Tragic
26.6%
Married-couple Households
Fair
45.9%
Tragic
45.3%
Average Family Size
Tragic
3.19
Tragic
3.17
Single Father Households
Tragic
2.8%
Exceptional
2.1%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
7.0%
Exceptional
5.9%
Currently Married
Average
46.6%
Poor
45.8%
Divorced or Separated
Tragic
14.2%
Exceptional
11.7%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
36.3%
Excellent
30.3%

Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Spain Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Spain communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 14.5%, a difference of 85.1%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 37.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 30.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 85.8%, a difference of 7.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.0% compared to 50.4%, a difference of 17.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 30.9%).
Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Spain Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricChickasawImmigrants from Spain
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.9%
Tragic
14.5%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
92.3%
Tragic
85.8%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
59.0%
Tragic
50.4%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
22.2%
Tragic
17.0%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.4%
Tragic
5.4%

Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Spain Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Spain communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.4% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 88.3%), doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 69.7%), and master's degree (11.4% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 67.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 10th grade (94.1% compared to 93.8%, a difference of 0.30%), nursery school (98.4% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.40%), and kindergarten (98.4% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.41%).
Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Spain Education Level
Education Level MetricChickasawImmigrants from Spain
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.7%
Good
2.0%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.4%
Average
98.0%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.4%
Average
98.0%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Average
97.9%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Average
97.9%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Average
97.8%
4th Grade
Exceptional
98.0%
Average
97.5%
5th Grade
Exceptional
97.9%
Average
97.3%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.6%
Fair
97.0%
7th Grade
Exceptional
96.7%
Fair
96.0%
8th Grade
Exceptional
96.4%
Fair
95.7%
9th Grade
Exceptional
95.5%
Average
94.9%
10th Grade
Excellent
94.1%
Average
93.8%
11th Grade
Fair
92.3%
Good
92.7%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
90.3%
Excellent
91.6%
High School Diploma
Poor
88.4%
Good
89.5%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
83.8%
Excellent
86.7%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
60.4%
Exceptional
68.4%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
53.3%
Exceptional
63.4%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
38.6%
Exceptional
51.9%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
30.4%
Exceptional
44.3%
Master's Degree
Tragic
11.4%
Exceptional
19.1%
Professional Degree
Tragic
3.4%
Exceptional
6.3%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.5%
Exceptional
2.6%

Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Spain Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Spain communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (16.1% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 61.9%), hearing disability (4.5% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 60.4%), and vision disability (3.2% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 51.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.5% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 6.3%), disability age over 75 (51.2% compared to 46.0%, a difference of 11.4%), and self-care disability (2.9% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 22.2%).
Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Spain Disability
Disability MetricChickasawImmigrants from Spain
Disability
Tragic
15.2%
Exceptional
10.9%
Males
Tragic
15.1%
Exceptional
10.3%
Females
Tragic
15.2%
Exceptional
11.4%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.7%
Excellent
1.2%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
6.8%
Exceptional
5.2%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
9.0%
Exceptional
5.9%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
16.1%
Exceptional
10.0%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
30.2%
Exceptional
21.9%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
51.2%
Exceptional
46.0%
Vision
Tragic
3.2%
Excellent
2.1%
Hearing
Tragic
4.5%
Exceptional
2.8%
Cognitive
Tragic
18.5%
Fair
17.4%
Ambulatory
Tragic
8.0%
Exceptional
5.6%
Self-Care
Tragic
2.9%
Exceptional
2.3%