Immigrants from Oceania vs Immigrants from China Community Comparison
COMPARE
Immigrants from Oceania
Immigrants from China
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Immigrants from Oceania
Immigrants from China
6,183
SOCIAL INDEX
59.3/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
161st/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
7,289
SOCIAL INDEX
70.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
125th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Immigrants from China Integration in Immigrants from Oceania Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 287,030,290 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from China within Immigrant from Oceania communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.131. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Oceania within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.038% in Immigrants from China. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Oceania corresponds to a decrease of 37.8 Immigrants from China.
Immigrants from Oceania vs Immigrants from China Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($97,623 compared to $119,756, a difference of 22.7%), median male earnings ($55,712 compared to $67,353, a difference of 20.9%), and per capita income ($45,220 compared to $54,264, a difference of 20.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (25.6% compared to 26.7%, a difference of 4.1%), householder income over 65 years ($64,416 compared to $69,174, a difference of 7.4%), and householder income under 25 years ($53,680 compared to $57,931, a difference of 7.9%).
| Income Metric | Immigrants from Oceania | Immigrants from China |
| Per Capita Income | Excellent $45,220 | Exceptional $54,264 |
| Median Family Income | Excellent $106,453 | Exceptional $125,540 |
| Median Household Income | Exceptional $89,100 | Exceptional $105,335 |
| Median Earnings | Excellent $47,617 | Exceptional $56,638 |
| Median Male Earnings | Good $55,712 | Exceptional $67,353 |
| Median Female Earnings | Good $40,297 | Exceptional $46,972 |
| Householder Age | Under 25 years | Exceptional $53,680 | Exceptional $57,931 |
| Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Excellent $97,623 | Exceptional $119,756 |
| Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Excellent $103,705 | Exceptional $122,178 |
| Householder Age | Over 65 years | Exceptional $64,416 | Exceptional $69,174 |
| Wage/Income Gap | Average 25.6% | Poor 26.7% |
Immigrants from Oceania vs Immigrants from China Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (16.9% compared to 13.6%, a difference of 24.2%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (13.5% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 20.8%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (16.1% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 20.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple family poverty (5.0% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 1.3%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.7% compared to 20.2%, a difference of 2.2%), and single father poverty (15.4% compared to 14.9%, a difference of 3.4%).
| Poverty Metric | Immigrants from Oceania | Immigrants from China |
| Poverty | Average 12.3% | Exceptional 11.6% |
| Families | Good 8.7% | Exceptional 7.8% |
| Males | Average 11.2% | Excellent 10.7% |
| Females | Average 13.3% | Exceptional 12.5% |
| Females 18 to 24 years | Excellent 19.7% | Average 20.2% |
| Females 25 to 34 years | Average 13.5% | Exceptional 11.2% |
| Children Under 5 years | Good 16.9% | Exceptional 13.6% |
| Children Under 16 years | Good 15.9% | Exceptional 13.3% |
| Boys Under 16 years | Good 16.0% | Exceptional 13.6% |
| Girls Under 16 years | Good 16.1% | Exceptional 13.4% |
| Single Males | Exceptional 12.4% | Exceptional 11.4% |
| Single Females | Good 20.7% | Exceptional 18.1% |
| Single Fathers | Exceptional 15.4% | Exceptional 14.9% |
| Single Mothers | Good 28.7% | Exceptional 26.1% |
| Married Couples | Good 5.0% | Excellent 5.0% |
| Seniors Over 65 years | Excellent 10.4% | Tragic 11.5% |
| Seniors Over 75 years | Excellent 11.7% | Tragic 13.2% |
| Receiving Food Stamps | Good 11.4% | Exceptional 9.6% |
Immigrants from Oceania vs Immigrants from China Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.5% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 20.2%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.0% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 15.6%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.8% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 8.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female unemployment (5.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 0.32%), unemployment (5.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 0.71%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.2% compared to 17.5%, a difference of 1.2%).
| Unemployment Metric | Immigrants from Oceania | Immigrants from China |
| Unemployment | Good 5.2% | Good 5.2% |
| Males | Average 5.3% | Good 5.2% |
| Females | Good 5.2% | Good 5.2% |
| Youth < 25 | Excellent 11.4% | Average 11.6% |
| Age | 16 to 19 years | Excellent 17.2% | Good 17.5% |
| Age | 20 to 24 years | Exceptional 10.0% | Fair 10.4% |
| Age | 25 to 29 years | Exceptional 6.4% | Exceptional 6.2% |
| Age | 30 to 34 years | Good 5.4% | Exceptional 5.1% |
| Age | 35 to 44 years | Fair 4.8% | Exceptional 4.4% |
| Age | 45 to 54 years | Excellent 4.4% | Average 4.5% |
| Age | 55 to 59 years | Exceptional 4.7% | Tragic 5.0% |
| Age | 60 to 64 years | Exceptional 4.7% | Tragic 5.1% |
| Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 5.2% | Fair 5.4% |
| Seniors > 65 | Exceptional 5.0% | Poor 5.2% |
| Seniors > 75 | Poor 9.0% | Exceptional 7.8% |
| Women w/ Children < 6 | Good 7.5% | Exceptional 6.2% |
| Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Exceptional 8.1% | Exceptional 7.7% |
| Women w/ Children < 18 | Excellent 5.3% | Exceptional 4.9% |
Immigrants from Oceania vs Immigrants from China Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (37.9% compared to 31.1%, a difference of 21.7%), in labor force | age 20-24 (76.1% compared to 71.1%, a difference of 7.1%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.0% compared to 85.4%, a difference of 1.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (65.5% compared to 65.4%, a difference of 0.15%), in labor force | age 20-64 (79.3% compared to 79.7%, a difference of 0.45%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.2% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 0.52%).
| Labor Participation Metric | Immigrants from Oceania | Immigrants from China |
| In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Excellent 65.5% | Excellent 65.4% |
| In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Poor 79.3% | Good 79.7% |
| In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 37.9% | Tragic 31.1% |
| In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Exceptional 76.1% | Tragic 71.1% |
| In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Tragic 84.2% | Average 84.6% |
| In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 84.0% | Exceptional 85.4% |
| In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 83.9% | Exceptional 84.7% |
| In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 82.1% | Exceptional 83.2% |
Immigrants from Oceania vs Immigrants from China Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.5% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 33.1%), single mother households (6.3% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 24.1%), and births to unmarried women (30.6% compared to 24.7%, a difference of 23.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.9% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 0.31%), average family size (3.29 compared to 3.23, a difference of 2.0%), and family households with children (28.1% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 2.4%).
| Family Structure Metric | Immigrants from Oceania | Immigrants from China |
| Family Households | Exceptional 64.9% | Excellent 64.7% |
| Family Households with Children | Exceptional 28.1% | Average 27.4% |
| Married-couple Households | Good 46.9% | Exceptional 48.4% |
| Average Family Size | Exceptional 3.29 | Average 3.23 |
| Single Father Households | Tragic 2.5% | Exceptional 1.8% |
| Single Mother Households | Average 6.3% | Exceptional 5.1% |
| Currently Married | Average 46.5% | Exceptional 47.9% |
| Divorced or Separated | Good 11.9% | Exceptional 10.0% |
| Births to Unmarried Women | Excellent 30.6% | Exceptional 24.7% |
Immigrants from Oceania vs Immigrants from China Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.7% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 55.7%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.6% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 26.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.8% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 19.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.4% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 6.4%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.5% compared to 51.5%, a difference of 11.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.8% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 19.7%).
| Vehicle Availability Metric | Immigrants from Oceania | Immigrants from China |
| No Vehicles Available | Excellent 9.7% | Tragic 15.2% |
| 1+ Vehicles Available | Excellent 90.4% | Tragic 84.9% |
| 2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 57.5% | Tragic 51.5% |
| 3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 21.8% | Tragic 18.2% |
| 4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.6% | Poor 6.0% |
Immigrants from Oceania vs Immigrants from China Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.9% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 61.7%), professional degree (4.6% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 47.3%), and master's degree (14.7% compared to 21.2%, a difference of 44.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 11th grade (92.2% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 0.040%), 10th grade (93.4% compared to 93.2%, a difference of 0.24%), and 9th grade (94.5% compared to 94.3%, a difference of 0.29%).
| Education Level Metric | Immigrants from Oceania | Immigrants from China |
| No Schooling Completed | Poor 2.2% | Tragic 2.6% |
| Nursery School | Poor 97.8% | Tragic 97.5% |
| Kindergarten | Poor 97.8% | Tragic 97.4% |
| 1st Grade | Poor 97.8% | Tragic 97.4% |
| 2nd Grade | Poor 97.7% | Tragic 97.3% |
| 3rd Grade | Tragic 97.6% | Tragic 97.2% |
| 4th Grade | Tragic 97.3% | Tragic 97.0% |
| 5th Grade | Poor 97.1% | Tragic 96.8% |
| 6th Grade | Poor 96.8% | Tragic 96.4% |
| 7th Grade | Tragic 95.7% | Tragic 95.3% |
| 8th Grade | Tragic 95.3% | Tragic 95.0% |
| 9th Grade | Poor 94.5% | Tragic 94.3% |
| 10th Grade | Poor 93.4% | Tragic 93.2% |
| 11th Grade | Fair 92.2% | Fair 92.3% |
| 12th Grade, No Diploma | Fair 90.9% | Good 91.3% |
| High School Diploma | Fair 88.8% | Good 89.3% |
| GED/Equivalency | Fair 85.5% | Exceptional 86.9% |
| College, Under 1 year | Average 65.6% | Exceptional 70.9% |
| College, 1 year or more | Average 59.4% | Exceptional 66.4% |
| Associate's Degree | Fair 45.8% | Exceptional 55.5% |
| Bachelor's Degree | Fair 37.3% | Exceptional 48.4% |
| Master's Degree | Fair 14.7% | Exceptional 21.2% |
| Professional Degree | Good 4.6% | Exceptional 6.7% |
| Doctorate Degree | Good 1.9% | Exceptional 3.1% |
Immigrants from Oceania vs Immigrants from China Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (11.4% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 30.7%), disability age 18 to 34 (6.7% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 22.4%), and hearing disability (3.2% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 21.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (48.0% compared to 46.3%, a difference of 3.7%), cognitive disability (17.6% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 4.0%), and self-care disability (2.5% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 7.0%).
| Disability Metric | Immigrants from Oceania | Immigrants from China |
| Disability | Fair 11.8% | Exceptional 10.1% |
| Males | Fair 11.4% | Exceptional 9.5% |
| Females | Good 12.1% | Exceptional 10.7% |
| Age | Under 5 years | Exceptional 1.2% | Exceptional 0.96% |
| Age | 5 to 17 years | Exceptional 5.4% | Exceptional 4.5% |
| Age | 18 to 34 years | Fair 6.7% | Exceptional 5.4% |
| Age | 35 to 64 years | Fair 11.4% | Exceptional 8.7% |
| Age | 65 to 74 years | Poor 24.0% | Exceptional 20.3% |
| Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 48.0% | Exceptional 46.3% |
| Vision | Average 2.2% | Exceptional 1.8% |
| Hearing | Tragic 3.2% | Exceptional 2.6% |
| Cognitive | Tragic 17.6% | Exceptional 16.9% |
| Ambulatory | Good 6.1% | Exceptional 5.3% |
| Self-Care | Fair 2.5% | Exceptional 2.3% |