Chickasaw vs Japanese Community Comparison
COMPARE
Chickasaw
Japanese
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Chickasaw
Japanese
3,663
SOCIAL INDEX
34.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
212th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
2,662
SOCIAL INDEX
24.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
248th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Japanese Integration in Chickasaw Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 106,486,010 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Japanese within Chickasaw communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.302. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chickasaw within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.142% in Japanese. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chickasaw corresponds to an increase of 142.3 Japanese.
Chickasaw vs Japanese Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Japanese communities in the United States are seen in median household income ($70,005 compared to $83,395, a difference of 19.1%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($82,193 compared to $96,834, a difference of 17.8%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($77,929 compared to $91,624, a difference of 17.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median male earnings ($47,832 compared to $51,473, a difference of 7.6%), householder income over 65 years ($53,732 compared to $57,919, a difference of 7.8%), and per capita income ($36,475 compared to $39,870, a difference of 9.3%).
Income Metric | Chickasaw | Japanese |
Per Capita Income | Tragic $36,475 | Tragic $39,870 |
Median Family Income | Tragic $85,356 | Tragic $97,288 |
Median Household Income | Tragic $70,005 | Fair $83,395 |
Median Earnings | Tragic $40,672 | Tragic $44,825 |
Median Male Earnings | Tragic $47,832 | Tragic $51,473 |
Median Female Earnings | Tragic $34,414 | Tragic $38,528 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Tragic $44,763 | Good $52,365 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Tragic $77,929 | Poor $91,624 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Tragic $82,193 | Poor $96,834 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Tragic $53,732 | Tragic $57,919 |
Wage/Income Gap | Tragic 27.2% | Exceptional 23.8% |
Chickasaw vs Japanese Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Japanese communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 18-24 year olds (24.5% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 30.1%), single male poverty (16.3% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 24.6%), and single father poverty (19.0% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 24.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple family poverty (5.8% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 4.2%), receiving food stamps (13.1% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 7.6%), and family poverty (10.8% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 9.7%).
Poverty Metric | Chickasaw | Japanese |
Poverty | Tragic 14.7% | Tragic 13.3% |
Families | Tragic 10.8% | Tragic 9.9% |
Males | Tragic 13.5% | Tragic 12.2% |
Females | Tragic 15.9% | Tragic 14.5% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 24.5% | Exceptional 18.8% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 17.0% | Poor 14.1% |
Children Under 5 years | Tragic 21.8% | Poor 18.1% |
Children Under 16 years | Tragic 19.5% | Tragic 17.7% |
Boys Under 16 years | Tragic 19.8% | Tragic 17.7% |
Girls Under 16 years | Tragic 19.6% | Tragic 17.8% |
Single Males | Tragic 16.3% | Poor 13.1% |
Single Females | Tragic 26.3% | Fair 21.3% |
Single Fathers | Tragic 19.0% | Exceptional 15.2% |
Single Mothers | Tragic 34.4% | Good 28.9% |
Married Couples | Tragic 5.8% | Tragic 5.6% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Good 10.7% | Tragic 12.2% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Exceptional 11.6% | Tragic 13.3% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Tragic 13.1% | Tragic 14.1% |
Chickasaw vs Japanese Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Japanese communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.0% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 19.8%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.3% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 17.4%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.3% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 13.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.8% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 0.45%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (9.9% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 1.0%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.6% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 1.8%).
Unemployment Metric | Chickasaw | Japanese |
Unemployment | Exceptional 5.0% | Tragic 5.6% |
Males | Excellent 5.2% | Tragic 5.8% |
Females | Excellent 5.1% | Tragic 5.6% |
Youth < 25 | Exceptional 11.2% | Fair 11.7% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Exceptional 16.7% | Average 17.6% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Exceptional 9.9% | Exceptional 10.0% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Fair 6.7% | Tragic 6.9% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Tragic 6.2% | Tragic 5.9% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 4.9% | Tragic 5.1% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Exceptional 4.2% | Tragic 4.7% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Good 4.8% | Average 4.8% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Exceptional 4.3% | Tragic 5.1% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 4.7% | Exceptional 5.2% |
Seniors > 65 | Exceptional 4.4% | Exceptional 4.9% |
Seniors > 75 | Exceptional 7.3% | Exceptional 8.3% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Tragic 9.0% | Good 7.5% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Exceptional 8.6% | Exceptional 8.4% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Good 5.4% | Tragic 5.7% |
Chickasaw vs Japanese Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Japanese communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (62.3% compared to 65.8%, a difference of 5.6%), in labor force | age 20-64 (76.2% compared to 79.1%, a difference of 3.7%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (80.9% compared to 83.6%, a difference of 3.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (74.5% compared to 75.3%, a difference of 1.1%), in labor force | age 16-19 (38.3% compared to 37.5%, a difference of 2.1%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (81.9% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 2.9%).
Labor Participation Metric | Chickasaw | Japanese |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 62.3% | Exceptional 65.8% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Tragic 76.2% | Tragic 79.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 38.3% | Excellent 37.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Poor 74.5% | Good 75.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Tragic 81.9% | Poor 84.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 81.9% | Tragic 84.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 80.9% | Tragic 83.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 79.0% | Tragic 81.6% |
Chickasaw vs Japanese Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Japanese communities in the United States are seen in divorced or separated (14.2% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 18.7%), single mother households (7.0% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 5.1%), and average family size (3.19 compared to 3.35, a difference of 5.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father households (2.8% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 0.020%), married-couple households (45.9% compared to 45.2%, a difference of 1.5%), and family households (64.4% compared to 65.9%, a difference of 2.3%).
Family Structure Metric | Chickasaw | Japanese |
Family Households | Good 64.4% | Exceptional 65.9% |
Family Households with Children | Exceptional 28.2% | Exceptional 29.4% |
Married-couple Households | Fair 45.9% | Tragic 45.2% |
Average Family Size | Tragic 3.19 | Exceptional 3.35 |
Single Father Households | Tragic 2.8% | Tragic 2.8% |
Single Mother Households | Tragic 7.0% | Tragic 7.4% |
Currently Married | Average 46.6% | Tragic 44.5% |
Divorced or Separated | Tragic 14.2% | Good 12.0% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Tragic 36.3% | Tragic 35.2% |
Chickasaw vs Japanese Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Japanese communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 20.0%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 3.5%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (59.0% compared to 57.5%, a difference of 2.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 90.6%, a difference of 1.8%), 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 21.8%, a difference of 1.9%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (59.0% compared to 57.5%, a difference of 2.6%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Chickasaw | Japanese |
No Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.9% | Exceptional 9.4% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 92.3% | Exceptional 90.6% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 59.0% | Exceptional 57.5% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 22.2% | Exceptional 21.8% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.4% | Exceptional 7.7% |
Chickasaw vs Japanese Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Japanese communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.7% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 97.5%), bachelor's degree (30.4% compared to 33.3%, a difference of 9.6%), and master's degree (11.4% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 9.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 0.61%), college, under 1 year (60.4% compared to 61.5%, a difference of 1.7%), and ged/equivalency (83.8% compared to 82.4%, a difference of 1.8%).
Education Level Metric | Chickasaw | Japanese |
No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.7% | Tragic 3.3% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.4% | Tragic 96.7% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.4% | Tragic 96.7% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.3% | Tragic 96.6% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.3% | Tragic 96.5% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.2% | Tragic 96.4% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 98.0% | Tragic 96.0% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 97.9% | Tragic 95.7% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 97.6% | Tragic 95.4% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 96.7% | Tragic 94.0% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 96.4% | Tragic 93.6% |
9th Grade | Exceptional 95.5% | Tragic 92.6% |
10th Grade | Excellent 94.1% | Tragic 91.2% |
11th Grade | Fair 92.3% | Tragic 89.9% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Tragic 90.3% | Tragic 88.3% |
High School Diploma | Poor 88.4% | Tragic 85.9% |
GED/Equivalency | Tragic 83.8% | Tragic 82.4% |
College, Under 1 year | Tragic 60.4% | Tragic 61.5% |
College, 1 year or more | Tragic 53.3% | Tragic 55.2% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 38.6% | Tragic 41.7% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 30.4% | Tragic 33.3% |
Master's Degree | Tragic 11.4% | Tragic 12.5% |
Professional Degree | Tragic 3.4% | Tragic 3.5% |
Doctorate Degree | Tragic 1.5% | Tragic 1.5% |
Chickasaw vs Japanese Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Japanese communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (4.5% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 48.9%), disability age under 5 (1.7% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 47.8%), and vision disability (3.2% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 34.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.5% compared to 18.3%, a difference of 1.3%), disability age over 75 (51.2% compared to 50.2%, a difference of 1.9%), and self-care disability (2.9% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 6.6%).
Disability Metric | Chickasaw | Japanese |
Disability | Tragic 15.2% | Tragic 12.2% |
Males | Tragic 15.1% | Tragic 11.7% |
Females | Tragic 15.2% | Tragic 12.6% |
Age | Under 5 years | Tragic 1.7% | Exceptional 1.2% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 6.8% | Tragic 6.1% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 9.0% | Poor 6.8% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 16.1% | Tragic 12.3% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 30.2% | Tragic 25.7% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 51.2% | Tragic 50.2% |
Vision | Tragic 3.2% | Tragic 2.4% |
Hearing | Tragic 4.5% | Average 3.0% |
Cognitive | Tragic 18.5% | Tragic 18.3% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 8.0% | Poor 6.3% |
Self-Care | Tragic 2.9% | Tragic 2.7% |