Chickasaw vs Malaysian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 103,937,491 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Malaysians within Chickasaw communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.363. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chickasaw within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.011% in Malaysians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chickasaw corresponds to a decrease of 10.8 Malaysians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Malaysian communities in the United States are seen in median household income ($70,005 compared to $81,064, a difference of 15.8%), householder income under 25 years ($44,763 compared to $51,615, a difference of 15.3%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($82,193 compared to $94,517, a difference of 15.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median male earnings ($47,832 compared to $50,772, a difference of 6.1%), per capita income ($36,475 compared to $39,194, a difference of 7.4%), and median earnings ($40,672 compared to $43,844, a difference of 7.8%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Malaysian communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (16.3% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 29.3%), single father poverty (19.0% compared to 14.9%, a difference of 26.9%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (24.5% compared to 19.9%, a difference of 23.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.6% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 1.2%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.7% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 1.2%), and receiving food stamps (13.1% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 3.0%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Malaysian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.3% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 21.7%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.0% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 15.7%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.4% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 14.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.6% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 0.52%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (9.9% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 1.1%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.2% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Malaysian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (62.3% compared to 66.1%, a difference of 6.1%), in labor force | age 20-64 (76.2% compared to 79.5%, a difference of 4.3%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (79.0% compared to 82.0%, a difference of 3.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (81.9% compared to 84.1%, a difference of 2.7%), in labor force | age 25-29 (81.9% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 3.4%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (80.9% compared to 83.8%, a difference of 3.5%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Malaysian communities in the United States are seen in divorced or separated (14.2% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 14.9%), births to unmarried women (36.3% compared to 33.9%, a difference of 7.1%), and family households with children (28.2% compared to 29.8%, a difference of 5.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father households (2.8% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 0.80%), married-couple households (45.9% compared to 46.3%, a difference of 0.85%), and currently married (46.6% compared to 45.9%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Malaysian communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 3.0%), no vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 1.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 22.6%, a difference of 1.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 0.050%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.0% compared to 59.8%, a difference of 1.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 22.6%, a difference of 1.9%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Malaysian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.7% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 63.3%), bachelor's degree (30.4% compared to 32.9%, a difference of 8.3%), and associate's degree (38.6% compared to 41.6%, a difference of 7.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ged/equivalency (83.8% compared to 83.3%, a difference of 0.64%), professional degree (3.4% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 0.97%), and nursery school (98.4% compared to 97.3%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Malaysian communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (4.5% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 40.7%), vision disability (3.2% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 36.7%), and disability age under 5 (1.7% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 34.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.5% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 3.3%), disability age over 75 (51.2% compared to 49.0%, a difference of 4.5%), and self-care disability (2.9% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 12.6%).