Chickasaw vs Hawaiian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 126,584,923 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Hawaiians within Chickasaw communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.224. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chickasaw within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.020% in Hawaiians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chickasaw corresponds to an increase of 19.6 Hawaiians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in median household income ($70,005 compared to $84,729, a difference of 21.0%), householder income over 65 years ($53,732 compared to $64,920, a difference of 20.8%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($82,193 compared to $98,778, a difference of 20.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median male earnings ($47,832 compared to $50,488, a difference of 5.6%), median earnings ($40,672 compared to $43,673, a difference of 7.4%), and per capita income ($36,475 compared to $39,403, a difference of 8.0%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 18-24 year olds (24.5% compared to 18.7%, a difference of 30.7%), single male poverty (16.3% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 29.4%), and single father poverty (19.0% compared to 15.1%, a difference of 25.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of receiving food stamps (13.1% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 1.4%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.7% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 4.1%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.6% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 4.8%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.3% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 26.2%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 22.9%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (4.7% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 20.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.7% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 1.0%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.4% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 1.7%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.8% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 2.6%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (62.3% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 3.9%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.5% compared to 77.0%, a difference of 3.5%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (76.2% compared to 78.7%, a difference of 3.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 16-19 (38.3% compared to 38.4%, a difference of 0.20%), in labor force | age 30-34 (81.9% compared to 83.0%, a difference of 1.3%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (81.9% compared to 83.0%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in divorced or separated (14.2% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 17.8%), births to unmarried women (36.3% compared to 33.2%, a difference of 9.3%), and average family size (3.19 compared to 3.41, a difference of 6.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (46.6% compared to 46.6%, a difference of 0.030%), family households with children (28.2% compared to 28.7%, a difference of 1.7%), and single father households (2.8% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 3.5%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 20.2%), 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 24.3%, a difference of 9.3%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (59.0% compared to 60.4%, a difference of 2.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 92.0%, a difference of 0.25%), no vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 2.3%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (59.0% compared to 60.4%, a difference of 2.4%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.7% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 27.5%), associate's degree (38.6% compared to 40.9%, a difference of 6.0%), and college, 1 year or more (53.3% compared to 55.6%, a difference of 4.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 11th grade (92.3% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 0.070%), high school diploma (88.4% compared to 88.6%, a difference of 0.24%), and nursery school (98.4% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.49%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.7% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 42.8%), vision disability (3.2% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 39.1%), and disability age 35 to 64 (16.1% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 30.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (51.2% compared to 49.2%, a difference of 4.1%), cognitive disability (18.5% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 5.1%), and self-care disability (2.9% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 9.6%).