Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 85,438,968 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar within Chickasaw communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.131. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chickasaw within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.017% in Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chickasaw corresponds to a decrease of 16.6 Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (27.2% compared to 22.8%, a difference of 18.9%), median household income ($70,005 compared to $78,682, a difference of 12.4%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($77,929 compared to $86,736, a difference of 11.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median male earnings ($47,832 compared to $50,298, a difference of 5.2%), householder income over 65 years ($53,732 compared to $57,114, a difference of 6.3%), and median earnings ($40,672 compared to $43,998, a difference of 8.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (16.3% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 24.3%), single female poverty (26.3% compared to 22.6%, a difference of 16.4%), and single father poverty (19.0% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 15.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of child poverty among girls under 16 (19.6% compared to 19.7%, a difference of 0.12%), child poverty under the age of 16 (19.5% compared to 19.4%, a difference of 0.54%), and receiving food stamps (13.1% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 1.7%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.0% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 22.1%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.2% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 22.0%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.6% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 14.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 0.090%), male unemployment (5.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 0.51%), and female unemployment (5.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 1.4%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (62.3% compared to 66.3%, a difference of 6.4%), in labor force | age 20-64 (76.2% compared to 79.7%, a difference of 4.5%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (80.9% compared to 84.0%, a difference of 3.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 16-19 (38.3% compared to 39.0%, a difference of 1.9%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.5% compared to 76.3%, a difference of 2.5%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (81.9% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 3.4%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar communities in the United States are seen in divorced or separated (14.2% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 17.0%), single father households (2.8% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 13.6%), and births to unmarried women (36.3% compared to 32.9%, a difference of 10.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother households (7.0% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 0.070%), family households with children (28.2% compared to 28.0%, a difference of 0.74%), and family households (64.4% compared to 62.6%, a difference of 2.9%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 32.6%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 19.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 18.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 89.7%, a difference of 2.9%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.0% compared to 53.9%, a difference of 9.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 18.0%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.7% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 85.6%), master's degree (11.4% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 18.3%), and professional degree (3.4% compared to 3.9%, a difference of 17.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ged/equivalency (83.8% compared to 83.0%, a difference of 0.97%), nursery school (98.4% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 1.6%), and kindergarten (98.4% compared to 96.8%, a difference of 1.6%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.7% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 54.3%), hearing disability (4.5% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 52.4%), and vision disability (3.2% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 45.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.5% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 1.4%), disability age over 75 (51.2% compared to 47.9%, a difference of 6.9%), and self-care disability (2.9% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 16.1%).