Chickasaw vs Arapaho Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 21,921,195 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Arapaho within Chickasaw communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.610. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chickasaw within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.101% in Arapaho. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chickasaw corresponds to an increase of 100.7 Arapaho.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (27.2% compared to 23.5%, a difference of 15.8%), median male earnings ($47,832 compared to $41,758, a difference of 14.5%), and per capita income ($36,475 compared to $32,345, a difference of 12.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($44,763 compared to $44,003, a difference of 1.7%), median household income ($70,005 compared to $67,965, a difference of 3.0%), and median family income ($85,356 compared to $82,064, a difference of 4.0%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (16.3% compared to 21.9%, a difference of 34.4%), single father poverty (19.0% compared to 24.0%, a difference of 26.5%), and family poverty (10.8% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 16.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single female poverty (26.3% compared to 26.4%, a difference of 0.63%), child poverty among boys under 16 (19.8% compared to 20.2%, a difference of 1.9%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (24.5% compared to 25.2%, a difference of 2.8%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.7% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 127.9%), male unemployment (5.2% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 112.6%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.0% compared to 19.0%, a difference of 112.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.3% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 9.7%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.4% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 19.3%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (4.7% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 23.8%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 25-29 (81.9% compared to 76.6%, a difference of 6.9%), in labor force | age 35-44 (80.9% compared to 78.1%, a difference of 3.6%), and in labor force | age 16-19 (38.3% compared to 37.3%, a difference of 2.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (62.3% compared to 62.1%, a difference of 0.24%), in labor force | age 30-34 (81.9% compared to 81.5%, a difference of 0.53%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (74.5% compared to 73.8%, a difference of 0.90%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (36.3% compared to 47.1%, a difference of 29.8%), currently married (46.6% compared to 40.5%, a difference of 14.9%), and average family size (3.19 compared to 3.64, a difference of 14.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother households (7.0% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 0.95%), family households (64.4% compared to 66.5%, a difference of 3.2%), and divorced or separated (14.2% compared to 14.8%, a difference of 4.3%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 25.8%), 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 26.4%, a difference of 19.1%), and no vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 6.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 92.7%, a difference of 0.49%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.0% compared to 60.2%, a difference of 2.1%), and no vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 6.9%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 29.4%), no schooling completed (1.7% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 24.2%), and professional degree (3.4% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 16.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 11th grade (92.3% compared to 92.4%, a difference of 0.040%), 7th grade (96.7% compared to 96.8%, a difference of 0.080%), and 8th grade (96.4% compared to 96.6%, a difference of 0.12%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in disability age 5 to 17 (6.8% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 44.4%), disability age under 5 (1.7% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 36.8%), and disability age 18 to 34 (9.0% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 26.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (51.2% compared to 49.8%, a difference of 2.8%), disability age 35 to 64 (16.1% compared to 15.1%, a difference of 6.9%), and disability age 65 to 74 (30.2% compared to 28.1%, a difference of 7.5%).