Chickasaw vs Yuman Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 32,358,047 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Yuman within Chickasaw communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.095. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chickasaw within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.010% in Yuman. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chickasaw corresponds to an increase of 9.9 Yuman.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Yuman communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (27.2% compared to 23.3%, a difference of 16.4%), householder income under 25 years ($44,763 compared to $50,933, a difference of 13.8%), and per capita income ($36,475 compared to $33,236, a difference of 9.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($82,193 compared to $82,139, a difference of 0.070%), householder income over 65 years ($53,732 compared to $53,110, a difference of 1.2%), and median household income ($70,005 compared to $68,743, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Yuman communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (5.8% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 68.1%), child poverty among boys under 16 (19.8% compared to 30.6%, a difference of 54.7%), and receiving food stamps (13.1% compared to 20.2%, a difference of 54.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (24.5% compared to 24.0%, a difference of 2.1%), single mother poverty (34.4% compared to 37.8%, a difference of 9.7%), and single female poverty (26.3% compared to 29.4%, a difference of 12.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Yuman communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.9% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 243.6%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (16.7% compared to 37.4%, a difference of 124.6%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.2% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 123.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.3% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 10.3%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.8% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 28.0%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.4% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 31.6%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Yuman communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.3% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 38.6%), in labor force | age 35-44 (80.9% compared to 74.7%, a difference of 8.3%), and in labor force | age > 16 (62.3% compared to 57.8%, a difference of 7.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (81.9% compared to 79.3%, a difference of 3.2%), in labor force | age 45-54 (79.0% compared to 76.3%, a difference of 3.6%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (74.5% compared to 70.3%, a difference of 6.0%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Yuman communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (7.0% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 36.8%), births to unmarried women (36.3% compared to 44.4%, a difference of 22.3%), and single father households (2.8% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 19.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (28.2% compared to 29.5%, a difference of 4.5%), married-couple households (45.9% compared to 43.3%, a difference of 6.0%), and family households (64.4% compared to 69.3%, a difference of 7.6%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Yuman communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 14.9%, a difference of 89.0%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 14.8%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (59.0% compared to 51.7%, a difference of 14.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 85.5%, a difference of 8.0%), 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 19.9%, a difference of 11.5%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (59.0% compared to 51.7%, a difference of 14.0%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Yuman communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.7% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 46.7%), bachelor's degree (30.4% compared to 24.5%, a difference of 23.9%), and master's degree (11.4% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 23.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.4% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.49%), 1st grade (98.3% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.52%), and kindergarten (98.4% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.53%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Yuman communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.7% compared to 0.95%, a difference of 83.9%), hearing disability (4.5% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 32.6%), and disability age 5 to 17 (6.8% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 26.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ambulatory disability (8.0% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 1.1%), disability age 35 to 64 (16.1% compared to 15.8%, a difference of 1.9%), and cognitive disability (18.5% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 2.3%).