Chickasaw vs Alaska Native Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 54,826,519 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Alaska Natives within Chickasaw communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.333. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chickasaw within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.022% in Alaska Natives. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chickasaw corresponds to an increase of 22.4 Alaska Natives.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Alaska Native communities in the United States are seen in householder income under 25 years ($44,763 compared to $54,000, a difference of 20.6%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($82,193 compared to $93,991, a difference of 14.3%), and median household income ($70,005 compared to $79,509, a difference of 13.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median male earnings ($47,832 compared to $49,711, a difference of 3.9%), median earnings ($40,672 compared to $43,750, a difference of 7.6%), and per capita income ($36,475 compared to $39,558, a difference of 8.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Alaska Native communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (13.1% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 19.2%), child poverty among boys under 16 (19.8% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 17.7%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (24.5% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 13.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.7% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 1.4%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (17.0% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 1.5%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.6% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 1.7%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Alaska Native communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.3% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 99.6%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.3% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 76.3%), and male unemployment (5.2% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 56.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.0% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 7.2%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.6% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 19.9%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.4% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 23.9%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Alaska Native communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (62.3% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 3.9%), in labor force | age 45-54 (79.0% compared to 81.8%, a difference of 3.4%), and in labor force | age 16-19 (38.3% compared to 39.1%, a difference of 2.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (81.9% compared to 81.6%, a difference of 0.39%), in labor force | age 30-34 (81.9% compared to 81.3%, a difference of 0.71%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (80.9% compared to 81.6%, a difference of 0.86%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Alaska Native communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.8% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 27.3%), divorced or separated (14.2% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 14.2%), and average family size (3.19 compared to 3.37, a difference of 5.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (45.9% compared to 45.6%, a difference of 0.65%), family households (64.4% compared to 65.1%, a difference of 1.1%), and currently married (46.6% compared to 45.5%, a difference of 2.3%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Alaska Native communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 121.4%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.0% compared to 53.6%, a difference of 10.1%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 83.8%, a difference of 10.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 1.3%), 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 21.0%, a difference of 5.8%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 83.8%, a difference of 10.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Alaska Native communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.7% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 14.9%), doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 4.8%), and bachelor's degree (30.4% compared to 29.4%, a difference of 3.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of college, under 1 year (60.4% compared to 60.4%, a difference of 0.0%), college, 1 year or more (53.3% compared to 53.4%, a difference of 0.20%), and 5th grade (97.9% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.34%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Alaska Native communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.7% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 69.1%), ambulatory disability (8.0% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 29.8%), and female disability (15.2% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 19.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of hearing disability (4.5% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 0.21%), disability age 65 to 74 (30.2% compared to 30.6%, a difference of 1.4%), and disability age over 75 (51.2% compared to 52.8%, a difference of 3.1%).