Chickasaw vs Korean Community Comparison

COMPARE

Chickasaw
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Korean
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Chickasaw

Koreans

Fair
Good
3,663
SOCIAL INDEX
34.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
212th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
6,713
SOCIAL INDEX
64.6/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
147th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Korean Integration in Chickasaw Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 144,870,875 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Koreans within Chickasaw communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.241. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chickasaw within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.027% in Koreans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chickasaw corresponds to an increase of 26.5 Koreans.
Chickasaw Integration in Korean Communities

Chickasaw vs Korean Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Korean communities in the United States are seen in median household income ($70,005 compared to $95,018, a difference of 35.7%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($82,193 compared to $110,334, a difference of 34.2%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($77,929 compared to $103,824, a difference of 33.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.2% compared to 25.4%, a difference of 6.8%), median male earnings ($47,832 compared to $56,672, a difference of 18.5%), and median earnings ($40,672 compared to $48,727, a difference of 19.8%).
Chickasaw vs Korean Income
Income MetricChickasawKorean
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$36,475
Good
$44,522
Median Family Income
Tragic
$85,356
Exceptional
$110,103
Median Household Income
Tragic
$70,005
Exceptional
$95,018
Median Earnings
Tragic
$40,672
Exceptional
$48,727
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$47,832
Excellent
$56,672
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$34,414
Exceptional
$41,276
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$44,763
Exceptional
$57,730
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$77,929
Exceptional
$103,824
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$82,193
Exceptional
$110,334
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$53,732
Exceptional
$67,472
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
27.2%
Good
25.4%

Chickasaw vs Korean Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Korean communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (21.8% compared to 14.4%, a difference of 51.5%), single male poverty (16.3% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 48.5%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (24.5% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 44.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.6% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 1.4%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.7% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 6.2%), and married-couple family poverty (5.8% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 25.9%).
Chickasaw vs Korean Poverty
Poverty MetricChickasawKorean
Poverty
Tragic
14.7%
Exceptional
10.9%
Families
Tragic
10.8%
Exceptional
7.8%
Males
Tragic
13.5%
Exceptional
9.9%
Females
Tragic
15.9%
Exceptional
11.9%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
24.5%
Exceptional
16.9%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
17.0%
Exceptional
12.0%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
21.8%
Exceptional
14.4%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
19.5%
Exceptional
13.9%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
19.8%
Exceptional
14.0%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
19.6%
Exceptional
14.1%
Single Males
Tragic
16.3%
Exceptional
11.0%
Single Females
Tragic
26.3%
Exceptional
18.6%
Single Fathers
Tragic
19.0%
Exceptional
14.0%
Single Mothers
Tragic
34.4%
Exceptional
26.4%
Married Couples
Tragic
5.8%
Exceptional
4.6%
Seniors Over 65 years
Good
10.7%
Exceptional
10.1%
Seniors Over 75 years
Exceptional
11.6%
Exceptional
11.5%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
13.1%
Exceptional
10.4%

Chickasaw vs Korean Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Korean communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.3% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 21.1%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.0% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 20.2%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.4% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 17.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.8% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 0.020%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.7% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 0.040%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 0.18%).
Chickasaw vs Korean Unemployment
Unemployment MetricChickasawKorean
Unemployment
Exceptional
5.0%
Fair
5.3%
Males
Excellent
5.2%
Fair
5.3%
Females
Excellent
5.1%
Poor
5.4%
Youth < 25
Exceptional
11.2%
Fair
11.7%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Exceptional
16.7%
Good
17.5%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
9.9%
Average
10.3%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Fair
6.7%
Fair
6.7%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
6.2%
Fair
5.6%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
4.9%
Fair
4.8%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
4.2%
Good
4.5%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Good
4.8%
Good
4.8%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.3%
Poor
4.9%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
4.7%
Excellent
5.3%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
4.4%
Fair
5.2%
Seniors > 75
Exceptional
7.3%
Fair
8.9%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
9.0%
Excellent
7.5%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
8.6%
Exceptional
8.2%
Women w/ Children < 18
Good
5.4%
Good
5.4%

Chickasaw vs Korean Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Korean communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.3% compared to 35.7%, a difference of 7.3%), in labor force | age > 16 (62.3% compared to 65.7%, a difference of 5.4%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (79.0% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 4.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (74.5% compared to 75.4%, a difference of 1.3%), in labor force | age 25-29 (81.9% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 2.9%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (81.9% compared to 84.5%, a difference of 3.2%).
Chickasaw vs Korean Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricChickasawKorean
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
62.3%
Exceptional
65.7%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
76.2%
Good
79.8%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
38.3%
Poor
35.7%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Poor
74.5%
Good
75.4%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
81.9%
Tragic
84.2%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
81.9%
Fair
84.5%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
80.9%
Fair
84.3%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
79.0%
Good
82.9%

Chickasaw vs Korean Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Korean communities in the United States are seen in divorced or separated (14.2% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 25.2%), births to unmarried women (36.3% compared to 30.1%, a difference of 20.5%), and single mother households (7.0% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 17.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (46.6% compared to 47.9%, a difference of 2.9%), family households with children (28.2% compared to 29.2%, a difference of 3.4%), and average family size (3.19 compared to 3.36, a difference of 5.3%).
Chickasaw vs Korean Family Structure
Family Structure MetricChickasawKorean
Family Households
Good
64.4%
Exceptional
68.3%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
28.2%
Exceptional
29.2%
Married-couple Households
Fair
45.9%
Exceptional
49.7%
Average Family Size
Tragic
3.19
Exceptional
3.36
Single Father Households
Tragic
2.8%
Fair
2.4%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
7.0%
Excellent
6.0%
Currently Married
Average
46.6%
Exceptional
47.9%
Divorced or Separated
Tragic
14.2%
Exceptional
11.3%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
36.3%
Excellent
30.1%

Chickasaw vs Korean Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Korean communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 16.3%), 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 24.1%, a difference of 8.4%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (59.0% compared to 61.0%, a difference of 3.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 92.1%, a difference of 0.22%), no vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 1.7%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (59.0% compared to 61.0%, a difference of 3.4%).
Chickasaw vs Korean Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricChickasawKorean
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.9%
Exceptional
8.0%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
92.3%
Exceptional
92.1%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
59.0%
Exceptional
61.0%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
22.2%
Exceptional
24.1%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.4%
Exceptional
8.6%

Chickasaw vs Korean Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Korean communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.7% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 40.3%), master's degree (11.4% compared to 14.0%, a difference of 22.6%), and bachelor's degree (30.4% compared to 37.0%, a difference of 21.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of high school diploma (88.4% compared to 88.6%, a difference of 0.23%), 11th grade (92.3% compared to 92.1%, a difference of 0.25%), and 12th grade, no diploma (90.3% compared to 90.8%, a difference of 0.58%).
Chickasaw vs Korean Education Level
Education Level MetricChickasawKorean
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.7%
Tragic
2.4%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.4%
Tragic
97.7%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.4%
Tragic
97.6%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Tragic
97.6%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Tragic
97.5%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Tragic
97.4%
4th Grade
Exceptional
98.0%
Tragic
97.1%
5th Grade
Exceptional
97.9%
Tragic
96.9%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.6%
Tragic
96.6%
7th Grade
Exceptional
96.7%
Tragic
95.3%
8th Grade
Exceptional
96.4%
Tragic
95.0%
9th Grade
Exceptional
95.5%
Tragic
94.3%
10th Grade
Excellent
94.1%
Tragic
93.2%
11th Grade
Fair
92.3%
Poor
92.1%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
90.3%
Fair
90.8%
High School Diploma
Poor
88.4%
Poor
88.6%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
83.8%
Average
85.6%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
60.4%
Good
65.9%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
53.3%
Average
59.7%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
38.6%
Fair
45.8%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
30.4%
Fair
37.0%
Master's Degree
Tragic
11.4%
Poor
14.0%
Professional Degree
Tragic
3.4%
Poor
4.1%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.5%
Poor
1.7%

Chickasaw vs Korean Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Korean communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (16.1% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 53.8%), vision disability (3.2% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 53.4%), and disability age under 5 (1.7% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 46.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (51.2% compared to 48.6%, a difference of 5.3%), cognitive disability (18.5% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 9.8%), and self-care disability (2.9% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 13.6%).
Chickasaw vs Korean Disability
Disability MetricChickasawKorean
Disability
Tragic
15.2%
Exceptional
11.3%
Males
Tragic
15.1%
Good
11.0%
Females
Tragic
15.2%
Exceptional
11.7%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.7%
Excellent
1.2%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
6.8%
Exceptional
5.1%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
9.0%
Exceptional
6.3%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
16.1%
Exceptional
10.5%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
30.2%
Good
23.1%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
51.2%
Tragic
48.6%
Vision
Tragic
3.2%
Exceptional
2.1%
Hearing
Tragic
4.5%
Fair
3.1%
Cognitive
Tragic
18.5%
Exceptional
16.8%
Ambulatory
Tragic
8.0%
Exceptional
5.9%
Self-Care
Tragic
2.9%
Poor
2.5%