Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Germany Community Comparison

COMPARE

Chickasaw
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Immigrants from Germany
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Chickasaw

Immigrants from Germany

Fair
Good
3,663
SOCIAL INDEX
34.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
212th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
6,453
SOCIAL INDEX
62.0/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
153rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Immigrants from Germany Integration in Chickasaw Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 139,311,124 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Germany within Chickasaw communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.504. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chickasaw within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.073% in Immigrants from Germany. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chickasaw corresponds to an increase of 73.2 Immigrants from Germany.
Chickasaw Integration in Immigrants from Germany Communities

Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Germany Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Germany communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($82,193 compared to $103,282, a difference of 25.7%), per capita income ($36,475 compared to $45,751, a difference of 25.4%), and median household income ($70,005 compared to $86,764, a difference of 23.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.2% compared to 27.5%, a difference of 1.4%), householder income under 25 years ($44,763 compared to $51,190, a difference of 14.4%), and median female earnings ($34,414 compared to $39,603, a difference of 15.1%).
Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Germany Income
Income MetricChickasawImmigrants from Germany
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$36,475
Exceptional
$45,751
Median Family Income
Tragic
$85,356
Excellent
$105,507
Median Household Income
Tragic
$70,005
Good
$86,764
Median Earnings
Tragic
$40,672
Excellent
$47,566
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$47,832
Excellent
$56,542
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$34,414
Average
$39,603
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$44,763
Tragic
$51,190
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$77,929
Good
$95,913
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$82,193
Excellent
$103,282
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$53,732
Excellent
$62,544
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
27.2%
Tragic
27.5%

Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Germany Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Germany communities in the United States are seen in family poverty (10.8% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 27.1%), child poverty under the age of 5 (21.8% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 25.4%), and single female poverty (26.3% compared to 21.3%, a difference of 23.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.6% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 1.2%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.7% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 5.6%), and single father poverty (19.0% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 12.0%).
Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Germany Poverty
Poverty MetricChickasawImmigrants from Germany
Poverty
Tragic
14.7%
Good
12.0%
Families
Tragic
10.8%
Excellent
8.5%
Males
Tragic
13.5%
Good
10.9%
Females
Tragic
15.9%
Good
13.1%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
24.5%
Fair
20.3%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
17.0%
Fair
13.9%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
21.8%
Average
17.4%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
19.5%
Good
15.8%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
19.8%
Good
16.2%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
19.6%
Good
16.1%
Single Males
Tragic
16.3%
Tragic
13.4%
Single Females
Tragic
26.3%
Fair
21.3%
Single Fathers
Tragic
19.0%
Tragic
16.9%
Single Mothers
Tragic
34.4%
Fair
29.5%
Married Couples
Tragic
5.8%
Exceptional
4.7%
Seniors Over 65 years
Good
10.7%
Exceptional
10.1%
Seniors Over 75 years
Exceptional
11.6%
Exceptional
11.5%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
13.1%
Exceptional
10.7%

Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Germany Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Germany communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.3% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 24.8%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.4% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 14.3%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.0% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 12.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male unemployment (5.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 0.020%), female unemployment (5.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.55%), and unemployment (5.0% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.74%).
Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Germany Unemployment
Unemployment MetricChickasawImmigrants from Germany
Unemployment
Exceptional
5.0%
Exceptional
5.1%
Males
Excellent
5.2%
Excellent
5.2%
Females
Excellent
5.1%
Excellent
5.1%
Youth < 25
Exceptional
11.2%
Good
11.5%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Exceptional
16.7%
Excellent
17.2%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
9.9%
Fair
10.4%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Fair
6.7%
Poor
6.8%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
6.2%
Fair
5.6%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
4.9%
Average
4.7%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
4.2%
Excellent
4.4%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Good
4.8%
Exceptional
4.7%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.3%
Exceptional
4.7%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
4.7%
Exceptional
5.3%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
4.4%
Exceptional
5.0%
Seniors > 75
Exceptional
7.3%
Tragic
9.2%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
9.0%
Tragic
7.9%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
8.6%
Tragic
9.2%
Women w/ Children < 18
Good
5.4%
Average
5.5%

Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Germany Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Germany communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 45-54 (79.0% compared to 82.1%, a difference of 3.8%), in labor force | age 35-44 (80.9% compared to 83.9%, a difference of 3.7%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (76.2% compared to 78.8%, a difference of 3.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 16-19 (38.3% compared to 39.1%, a difference of 2.0%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.5% compared to 76.2%, a difference of 2.4%), and in labor force | age > 16 (62.3% compared to 63.9%, a difference of 2.6%).
Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Germany Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricChickasawImmigrants from Germany
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
62.3%
Tragic
63.9%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
76.2%
Tragic
78.8%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
38.3%
Exceptional
39.1%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Poor
74.5%
Exceptional
76.2%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
81.9%
Poor
84.4%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
81.9%
Tragic
84.3%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
80.9%
Tragic
83.9%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
79.0%
Tragic
82.1%

Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Germany Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Germany communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.8% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 21.2%), divorced or separated (14.2% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 14.7%), and single mother households (7.0% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 14.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.4% compared to 64.3%, a difference of 0.16%), average family size (3.19 compared to 3.15, a difference of 1.1%), and currently married (46.6% compared to 47.8%, a difference of 2.6%).
Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Germany Family Structure
Family Structure MetricChickasawImmigrants from Germany
Family Households
Good
64.4%
Average
64.3%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
28.2%
Tragic
27.0%
Married-couple Households
Fair
45.9%
Exceptional
47.5%
Average Family Size
Tragic
3.19
Tragic
3.15
Single Father Households
Tragic
2.8%
Excellent
2.3%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
7.0%
Good
6.1%
Currently Married
Average
46.6%
Exceptional
47.8%
Divorced or Separated
Tragic
14.2%
Tragic
12.4%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
36.3%
Poor
32.8%

Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Germany Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Germany communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 11.1%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 9.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 20.8%, a difference of 6.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 91.4%, a difference of 0.96%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.0% compared to 57.9%, a difference of 1.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 20.8%, a difference of 6.6%).
Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Germany Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricChickasawImmigrants from Germany
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.9%
Exceptional
8.7%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
92.3%
Exceptional
91.4%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
59.0%
Exceptional
57.9%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
22.2%
Exceptional
20.8%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.4%
Exceptional
6.8%

Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Germany Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Germany communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.4% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 44.3%), master's degree (11.4% compared to 15.8%, a difference of 38.2%), and doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 37.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 8th grade (96.4% compared to 96.4%, a difference of 0.030%), 7th grade (96.7% compared to 96.7%, a difference of 0.080%), and 4th grade (98.0% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.090%).
Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Germany Education Level
Education Level MetricChickasawImmigrants from Germany
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.7%
Exceptional
1.8%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.4%
Exceptional
98.3%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.4%
Exceptional
98.3%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Exceptional
98.2%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Exceptional
98.2%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Exceptional
98.1%
4th Grade
Exceptional
98.0%
Exceptional
97.9%
5th Grade
Exceptional
97.9%
Exceptional
97.8%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.6%
Exceptional
97.5%
7th Grade
Exceptional
96.7%
Exceptional
96.7%
8th Grade
Exceptional
96.4%
Exceptional
96.4%
9th Grade
Exceptional
95.5%
Exceptional
95.6%
10th Grade
Excellent
94.1%
Exceptional
94.6%
11th Grade
Fair
92.3%
Exceptional
93.4%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
90.3%
Exceptional
92.0%
High School Diploma
Poor
88.4%
Exceptional
90.2%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
83.8%
Excellent
86.7%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
60.4%
Excellent
66.5%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
53.3%
Good
60.3%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
38.6%
Good
47.1%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
30.4%
Good
38.6%
Master's Degree
Tragic
11.4%
Excellent
15.8%
Professional Degree
Tragic
3.4%
Exceptional
4.9%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.5%
Exceptional
2.1%

Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Germany Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Germany communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (3.2% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 39.1%), disability age 35 to 64 (16.1% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 35.5%), and hearing disability (4.5% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 28.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.5% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 8.9%), disability age over 75 (51.2% compared to 46.7%, a difference of 9.6%), and self-care disability (2.9% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 13.9%).
Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Germany Disability
Disability MetricChickasawImmigrants from Germany
Disability
Tragic
15.2%
Tragic
12.5%
Males
Tragic
15.1%
Tragic
12.3%
Females
Tragic
15.2%
Tragic
12.7%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.7%
Tragic
1.4%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
6.8%
Tragic
5.9%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
9.0%
Tragic
7.2%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
16.1%
Tragic
11.9%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
30.2%
Average
23.4%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
51.2%
Exceptional
46.7%
Vision
Tragic
3.2%
Tragic
2.3%
Hearing
Tragic
4.5%
Tragic
3.5%
Cognitive
Tragic
18.5%
Exceptional
17.0%
Ambulatory
Tragic
8.0%
Tragic
6.4%
Self-Care
Tragic
2.9%
Poor
2.5%