Chickasaw vs Immigrants from England Community Comparison

COMPARE

Chickasaw
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Immigrants from England
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Chickasaw

Immigrants from England

Fair
Good
3,663
SOCIAL INDEX
34.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
212th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
8,183
SOCIAL INDEX
79.3/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
83rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Immigrants from England Integration in Chickasaw Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 129,595,920 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from England within Chickasaw communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.450. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chickasaw within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.015% in Immigrants from England. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chickasaw corresponds to an increase of 14.9 Immigrants from England.
Chickasaw Integration in Immigrants from England Communities

Chickasaw vs Immigrants from England Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from England communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($36,475 compared to $48,844, a difference of 33.9%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($82,193 compared to $109,446, a difference of 33.2%), and median household income ($70,005 compared to $92,098, a difference of 31.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.2% compared to 27.9%, a difference of 2.7%), householder income under 25 years ($44,763 compared to $51,817, a difference of 15.8%), and median female earnings ($34,414 compared to $41,277, a difference of 19.9%).
Chickasaw vs Immigrants from England Income
Income MetricChickasawImmigrants from England
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$36,475
Exceptional
$48,844
Median Family Income
Tragic
$85,356
Exceptional
$112,038
Median Household Income
Tragic
$70,005
Exceptional
$92,098
Median Earnings
Tragic
$40,672
Exceptional
$49,722
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$47,832
Exceptional
$59,527
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$34,414
Exceptional
$41,277
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$44,763
Fair
$51,817
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$77,929
Exceptional
$102,020
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$82,193
Exceptional
$109,446
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$53,732
Exceptional
$65,715
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
27.2%
Tragic
27.9%

Chickasaw vs Immigrants from England Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from England communities in the United States are seen in family poverty (10.8% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 36.1%), child poverty under the age of 5 (21.8% compared to 16.2%, a difference of 35.0%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (19.5% compared to 14.8%, a difference of 31.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.6% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 4.3%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.7% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 9.2%), and single father poverty (19.0% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 13.5%).
Chickasaw vs Immigrants from England Poverty
Poverty MetricChickasawImmigrants from England
Poverty
Tragic
14.7%
Exceptional
11.4%
Families
Tragic
10.8%
Exceptional
8.0%
Males
Tragic
13.5%
Exceptional
10.4%
Females
Tragic
15.9%
Exceptional
12.3%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
24.5%
Exceptional
19.5%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
17.0%
Excellent
13.0%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
21.8%
Exceptional
16.2%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
19.5%
Exceptional
14.8%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
19.8%
Exceptional
15.1%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
19.6%
Exceptional
15.1%
Single Males
Tragic
16.3%
Fair
13.0%
Single Females
Tragic
26.3%
Exceptional
20.2%
Single Fathers
Tragic
19.0%
Tragic
16.7%
Single Mothers
Tragic
34.4%
Exceptional
28.4%
Married Couples
Tragic
5.8%
Exceptional
4.5%
Seniors Over 65 years
Good
10.7%
Exceptional
9.8%
Seniors Over 75 years
Exceptional
11.6%
Exceptional
11.2%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
13.1%
Exceptional
10.0%

Chickasaw vs Immigrants from England Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from England communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.3% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 26.3%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.0% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 16.9%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.4% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 15.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment (5.0% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 0.37%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.4% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 0.57%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.7% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 0.74%).
Chickasaw vs Immigrants from England Unemployment
Unemployment MetricChickasawImmigrants from England
Unemployment
Exceptional
5.0%
Exceptional
5.0%
Males
Excellent
5.2%
Exceptional
5.1%
Females
Excellent
5.1%
Exceptional
5.0%
Youth < 25
Exceptional
11.2%
Good
11.5%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Exceptional
16.7%
Good
17.3%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
9.9%
Good
10.3%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Fair
6.7%
Poor
6.8%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
6.2%
Fair
5.5%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
4.9%
Good
4.6%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
4.2%
Exceptional
4.4%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Good
4.8%
Exceptional
4.7%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.3%
Exceptional
4.7%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
4.7%
Excellent
5.3%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
4.4%
Excellent
5.1%
Seniors > 75
Exceptional
7.3%
Tragic
9.3%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
9.0%
Average
7.7%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
8.6%
Average
8.9%
Women w/ Children < 18
Good
5.4%
Good
5.3%

Chickasaw vs Immigrants from England Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from England communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 45-54 (79.0% compared to 82.6%, a difference of 4.5%), in labor force | age 35-44 (80.9% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 4.1%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (76.2% compared to 79.2%, a difference of 3.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 16-19 (38.3% compared to 38.1%, a difference of 0.63%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.5% compared to 75.5%, a difference of 1.4%), and in labor force | age > 16 (62.3% compared to 64.2%, a difference of 3.0%).
Chickasaw vs Immigrants from England Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricChickasawImmigrants from England
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
62.3%
Tragic
64.2%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
76.2%
Tragic
79.2%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
38.3%
Exceptional
38.1%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Poor
74.5%
Excellent
75.5%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
81.9%
Good
84.7%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
81.9%
Average
84.7%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
80.9%
Fair
84.2%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
79.0%
Fair
82.6%

Chickasaw vs Immigrants from England Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from England communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.8% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 25.6%), single mother households (7.0% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 21.8%), and divorced or separated (14.2% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 17.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.4% compared to 64.4%, a difference of 0.020%), average family size (3.19 compared to 3.15, a difference of 1.3%), and currently married (46.6% compared to 48.3%, a difference of 3.7%).
Chickasaw vs Immigrants from England Family Structure
Family Structure MetricChickasawImmigrants from England
Family Households
Good
64.4%
Good
64.4%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
28.2%
Tragic
26.9%
Married-couple Households
Fair
45.9%
Exceptional
48.2%
Average Family Size
Tragic
3.19
Tragic
3.15
Single Father Households
Tragic
2.8%
Exceptional
2.2%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
7.0%
Exceptional
5.8%
Currently Married
Average
46.6%
Exceptional
48.3%
Divorced or Separated
Tragic
14.2%
Fair
12.1%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
36.3%
Good
31.1%

Chickasaw vs Immigrants from England Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from England communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 10.7%), no vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 10.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 20.7%, a difference of 7.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 91.4%, a difference of 0.91%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.0% compared to 58.1%, a difference of 1.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 20.7%, a difference of 7.3%).
Chickasaw vs Immigrants from England Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricChickasawImmigrants from England
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.9%
Exceptional
8.7%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
92.3%
Exceptional
91.4%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
59.0%
Exceptional
58.1%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
22.2%
Exceptional
20.7%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.4%
Exceptional
6.7%

Chickasaw vs Immigrants from England Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from England communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.4% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 58.0%), master's degree (11.4% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 49.2%), and doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 46.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4th grade (98.0% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.020%), 6th grade (97.6% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.020%), and 5th grade (97.9% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.030%).
Chickasaw vs Immigrants from England Education Level
Education Level MetricChickasawImmigrants from England
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.7%
Exceptional
1.7%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.4%
Exceptional
98.3%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.4%
Exceptional
98.3%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Exceptional
98.3%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Exceptional
98.3%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Exceptional
98.2%
4th Grade
Exceptional
98.0%
Exceptional
98.0%
5th Grade
Exceptional
97.9%
Exceptional
97.8%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.6%
Exceptional
97.6%
7th Grade
Exceptional
96.7%
Exceptional
96.8%
8th Grade
Exceptional
96.4%
Exceptional
96.6%
9th Grade
Exceptional
95.5%
Exceptional
95.9%
10th Grade
Excellent
94.1%
Exceptional
94.9%
11th Grade
Fair
92.3%
Exceptional
93.8%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
90.3%
Exceptional
92.6%
High School Diploma
Poor
88.4%
Exceptional
90.8%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
83.8%
Exceptional
87.6%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
60.4%
Exceptional
68.7%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
53.3%
Exceptional
62.8%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
38.6%
Exceptional
49.7%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
30.4%
Exceptional
41.4%
Master's Degree
Tragic
11.4%
Exceptional
17.0%
Professional Degree
Tragic
3.4%
Exceptional
5.3%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.5%
Exceptional
2.2%

Chickasaw vs Immigrants from England Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from England communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (3.2% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 48.0%), disability age 35 to 64 (16.1% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 46.5%), and disability age 65 to 74 (30.2% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 36.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (51.2% compared to 46.0%, a difference of 11.4%), cognitive disability (18.5% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 11.5%), and self-care disability (2.9% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 17.3%).
Chickasaw vs Immigrants from England Disability
Disability MetricChickasawImmigrants from England
Disability
Tragic
15.2%
Poor
12.0%
Males
Tragic
15.1%
Tragic
11.7%
Females
Tragic
15.2%
Average
12.2%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.7%
Tragic
1.4%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
6.8%
Fair
5.6%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
9.0%
Tragic
6.9%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
16.1%
Good
11.0%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
30.2%
Exceptional
22.2%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
51.2%
Exceptional
46.0%
Vision
Tragic
3.2%
Good
2.1%
Hearing
Tragic
4.5%
Tragic
3.3%
Cognitive
Tragic
18.5%
Exceptional
16.6%
Ambulatory
Tragic
8.0%
Average
6.1%
Self-Care
Tragic
2.9%
Good
2.4%