Chickasaw vs Austrian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 135,732,910 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Austrians within Chickasaw communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.048. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chickasaw within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.002% in Austrians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chickasaw corresponds to an increase of 1.7 Austrians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Austrian communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($82,193 compared to $108,692, a difference of 32.2%), per capita income ($36,475 compared to $48,116, a difference of 31.9%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($77,929 compared to $101,842, a difference of 30.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.2% compared to 28.4%, a difference of 4.6%), householder income under 25 years ($44,763 compared to $51,898, a difference of 15.9%), and median female earnings ($34,414 compared to $40,923, a difference of 18.9%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Austrian communities in the United States are seen in family poverty (10.8% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 38.5%), child poverty under the age of 5 (21.8% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 35.2%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (19.5% compared to 14.5%, a difference of 33.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.6% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 5.7%), single father poverty (19.0% compared to 17.1%, a difference of 10.8%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.7% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 11.0%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Austrian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.3% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 26.9%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.0% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 16.9%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.2% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 14.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (16.7% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 0.14%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.2% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 0.72%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.2% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 0.83%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Austrian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 45-54 (79.0% compared to 83.0%, a difference of 5.1%), in labor force | age 35-44 (80.9% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 4.6%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (76.2% compared to 79.7%, a difference of 4.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (74.5% compared to 76.5%, a difference of 2.7%), in labor force | age 16-19 (38.3% compared to 39.5%, a difference of 3.1%), and in labor force | age > 16 (62.3% compared to 64.6%, a difference of 3.6%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Austrian communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.8% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 24.1%), single mother households (7.0% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 22.7%), and divorced or separated (14.2% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 18.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.4% compared to 64.5%, a difference of 0.10%), average family size (3.19 compared to 3.14, a difference of 1.6%), and family households with children (28.2% compared to 27.1%, a difference of 4.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Austrian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 12.3%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 9.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 20.9%, a difference of 6.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (59.0% compared to 58.4%, a difference of 1.0%), 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 91.3%, a difference of 1.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 20.9%, a difference of 6.5%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Austrian communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.4% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 53.4%), master's degree (11.4% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 46.4%), and doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 39.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.4% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.040%), kindergarten (98.4% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.040%), and 1st grade (98.3% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.040%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Austrian communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (3.2% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 48.6%), disability age 35 to 64 (16.1% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 44.5%), and disability age 65 to 74 (30.2% compared to 22.4%, a difference of 35.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (51.2% compared to 46.0%, a difference of 11.4%), cognitive disability (18.5% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 11.7%), and self-care disability (2.9% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 18.6%).