Chickasaw vs Ghanaian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 88,345,272 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Ghanaians within Chickasaw communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.423. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chickasaw within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.085% in Ghanaians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chickasaw corresponds to an increase of 84.5 Ghanaians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Ghanaian communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (27.2% compared to 22.3%, a difference of 21.6%), median household income ($70,005 compared to $83,582, a difference of 19.4%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($82,193 compared to $97,277, a difference of 18.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median male earnings ($47,832 compared to $52,810, a difference of 10.4%), householder income over 65 years ($53,732 compared to $60,043, a difference of 11.7%), and median earnings ($40,672 compared to $46,440, a difference of 14.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Ghanaian communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (16.3% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 23.1%), single female poverty (26.3% compared to 21.6%, a difference of 21.8%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.6% compared to 14.0%, a difference of 19.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple family poverty (5.8% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 1.0%), child poverty among boys under 16 (19.8% compared to 18.9%, a difference of 4.9%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (19.5% compared to 18.6%, a difference of 4.9%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Ghanaian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 21.5%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.2% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 19.2%), and unemployment (5.0% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 19.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.2% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 3.2%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.7% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 7.4%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.9% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 7.8%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Ghanaian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.3% compared to 35.3%, a difference of 8.4%), in labor force | age > 16 (62.3% compared to 67.1%, a difference of 7.8%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (76.2% compared to 80.1%, a difference of 5.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (74.5% compared to 74.3%, a difference of 0.20%), in labor force | age 25-29 (81.9% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 3.5%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (81.9% compared to 85.4%, a difference of 4.3%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Ghanaian communities in the United States are seen in divorced or separated (14.2% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 17.7%), single father households (2.8% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 13.7%), and single mother households (7.0% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 11.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (28.2% compared to 28.5%, a difference of 1.1%), family households (64.4% compared to 63.5%, a difference of 1.5%), and average family size (3.19 compared to 3.29, a difference of 3.0%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Ghanaian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 109.3%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 41.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 35.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 83.6%, a difference of 10.3%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.0% compared to 48.0%, a difference of 23.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 35.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Ghanaian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.7% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 51.0%), master's degree (11.4% compared to 15.5%, a difference of 36.0%), and professional degree (3.4% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 26.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 12th grade, no diploma (90.3% compared to 90.0%, a difference of 0.41%), ged/equivalency (83.8% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 0.57%), and high school diploma (88.4% compared to 87.7%, a difference of 0.83%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Ghanaian communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (4.5% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 75.6%), disability age under 5 (1.7% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 44.1%), and vision disability (3.2% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 43.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.5% compared to 18.3%, a difference of 1.3%), disability age over 75 (51.2% compared to 47.5%, a difference of 7.7%), and self-care disability (2.9% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 15.4%).