Chickasaw vs Yaqui Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 62,769,927 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Yaqui within Chickasaw communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.531. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chickasaw within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.153% in Yaqui. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chickasaw corresponds to an increase of 152.5 Yaqui.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Yaqui communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (27.2% compared to 24.0%, a difference of 13.0%), householder income under 25 years ($44,763 compared to $48,300, a difference of 7.9%), and median household income ($70,005 compared to $74,596, a difference of 6.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median earnings ($40,672 compared to $40,647, a difference of 0.060%), per capita income ($36,475 compared to $36,112, a difference of 1.0%), and median female earnings ($34,414 compared to $34,943, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Yaqui communities in the United States are seen in single father poverty (19.0% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 21.6%), single male poverty (16.3% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 14.5%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (24.5% compared to 21.9%, a difference of 11.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 25-34 year olds (17.0% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 0.020%), child poverty under the age of 5 (21.8% compared to 21.7%, a difference of 0.41%), and male poverty (13.5% compared to 13.7%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Yaqui communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.3% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 28.3%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.4% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 25.9%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.4% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 22.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (9.9% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 0.21%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.6% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 1.5%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.0% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 4.1%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Yaqui communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.3% compared to 37.1%, a difference of 3.4%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.5% compared to 75.5%, a difference of 1.5%), and in labor force | age > 16 (62.3% compared to 63.0%, a difference of 1.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (79.0% compared to 78.9%, a difference of 0.21%), in labor force | age 25-29 (81.9% compared to 82.2%, a difference of 0.34%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (76.2% compared to 76.5%, a difference of 0.44%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Yaqui communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.8% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 15.9%), currently married (46.6% compared to 43.4%, a difference of 7.2%), and births to unmarried women (36.3% compared to 38.8%, a difference of 7.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.4% compared to 65.6%, a difference of 1.9%), married-couple households (45.9% compared to 44.5%, a difference of 3.1%), and family households with children (28.2% compared to 29.1%, a difference of 3.3%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Yaqui communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 9.2%), no vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 5.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 22.9%, a difference of 3.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 92.6%, a difference of 0.32%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.0% compared to 59.3%, a difference of 0.51%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 22.9%, a difference of 3.2%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Yaqui communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.7% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 43.5%), professional degree (3.4% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 6.5%), and bachelor's degree (30.4% compared to 29.0%, a difference of 4.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of college, 1 year or more (53.3% compared to 53.2%, a difference of 0.25%), college, under 1 year (60.4% compared to 60.2%, a difference of 0.33%), and nursery school (98.4% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.80%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Yaqui communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.7% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 43.9%), hearing disability (4.5% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 29.9%), and vision disability (3.2% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 27.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.5% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 0.11%), disability age over 75 (51.2% compared to 49.8%, a difference of 2.9%), and self-care disability (2.9% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 7.3%).