Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Canada Community Comparison
COMPARE
Chickasaw
Immigrants from Canada
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Chickasaw
Immigrants from Canada
3,663
SOCIAL INDEX
34.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
212th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
8,413
SOCIAL INDEX
81.6/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
73rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Immigrants from Canada Integration in Chickasaw Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 138,227,508 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Canada within Chickasaw communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.137. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chickasaw within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.006% in Immigrants from Canada. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chickasaw corresponds to a decrease of 6.3 Immigrants from Canada.
Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Canada Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Canada communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($36,475 compared to $49,412, a difference of 35.5%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($82,193 compared to $109,402, a difference of 33.1%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($77,929 compared to $102,616, a difference of 31.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.2% compared to 28.5%, a difference of 4.8%), householder income under 25 years ($44,763 compared to $53,411, a difference of 19.3%), and median female earnings ($34,414 compared to $41,373, a difference of 20.2%).
Income Metric | Chickasaw | Immigrants from Canada |
Per Capita Income | Tragic $36,475 | Exceptional $49,412 |
Median Family Income | Tragic $85,356 | Exceptional $112,374 |
Median Household Income | Tragic $70,005 | Exceptional $92,029 |
Median Earnings | Tragic $40,672 | Exceptional $50,192 |
Median Male Earnings | Tragic $47,832 | Exceptional $60,388 |
Median Female Earnings | Tragic $34,414 | Exceptional $41,373 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Tragic $44,763 | Exceptional $53,411 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Tragic $77,929 | Exceptional $102,616 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Tragic $82,193 | Exceptional $109,402 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Tragic $53,732 | Exceptional $64,952 |
Wage/Income Gap | Tragic 27.2% | Tragic 28.5% |
Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Canada Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Canada communities in the United States are seen in family poverty (10.8% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 38.6%), child poverty under the age of 5 (21.8% compared to 15.8%, a difference of 37.9%), and receiving food stamps (13.1% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 34.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.6% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 3.6%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.7% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 8.8%), and single father poverty (19.0% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 14.7%).
Poverty Metric | Chickasaw | Immigrants from Canada |
Poverty | Tragic 14.7% | Exceptional 11.3% |
Families | Tragic 10.8% | Exceptional 7.8% |
Males | Tragic 13.5% | Exceptional 10.2% |
Females | Tragic 15.9% | Exceptional 12.3% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 24.5% | Exceptional 19.5% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 17.0% | Exceptional 12.9% |
Children Under 5 years | Tragic 21.8% | Exceptional 15.8% |
Children Under 16 years | Tragic 19.5% | Exceptional 14.5% |
Boys Under 16 years | Tragic 19.8% | Exceptional 14.7% |
Girls Under 16 years | Tragic 19.6% | Exceptional 14.8% |
Single Males | Tragic 16.3% | Average 12.8% |
Single Females | Tragic 26.3% | Exceptional 20.2% |
Single Fathers | Tragic 19.0% | Fair 16.5% |
Single Mothers | Tragic 34.4% | Excellent 28.4% |
Married Couples | Tragic 5.8% | Exceptional 4.4% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Good 10.7% | Exceptional 9.8% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Exceptional 11.6% | Exceptional 11.2% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Tragic 13.1% | Exceptional 9.7% |
Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Canada Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Canada communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.3% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 24.8%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.0% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 18.1%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.2% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 15.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (16.7% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 0.24%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.2% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 0.39%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.7% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 1.7%).
Unemployment Metric | Chickasaw | Immigrants from Canada |
Unemployment | Exceptional 5.0% | Exceptional 4.9% |
Males | Excellent 5.2% | Exceptional 5.0% |
Females | Excellent 5.1% | Exceptional 4.9% |
Youth < 25 | Exceptional 11.2% | Exceptional 11.2% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Exceptional 16.7% | Exceptional 16.7% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Exceptional 9.9% | Excellent 10.1% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Fair 6.7% | Average 6.6% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Tragic 6.2% | Good 5.4% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 4.9% | Exceptional 4.5% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Exceptional 4.2% | Exceptional 4.4% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Good 4.8% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Exceptional 4.3% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 4.7% | Excellent 5.3% |
Seniors > 65 | Exceptional 4.4% | Excellent 5.1% |
Seniors > 75 | Exceptional 7.3% | Tragic 9.2% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Tragic 9.0% | Good 7.6% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Exceptional 8.6% | Poor 9.1% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Good 5.4% | Exceptional 5.2% |
Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Canada Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Canada communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 45-54 (79.0% compared to 82.5%, a difference of 4.4%), in labor force | age 35-44 (80.9% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 4.0%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (76.2% compared to 79.0%, a difference of 3.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 16-19 (38.3% compared to 38.9%, a difference of 1.6%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.5% compared to 75.9%, a difference of 1.9%), and in labor force | age > 16 (62.3% compared to 63.7%, a difference of 2.2%).
Labor Participation Metric | Chickasaw | Immigrants from Canada |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 62.3% | Tragic 63.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Tragic 76.2% | Tragic 79.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 38.3% | Exceptional 38.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Poor 74.5% | Exceptional 75.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Tragic 81.9% | Good 84.8% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 81.9% | Fair 84.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 80.9% | Poor 84.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 79.0% | Fair 82.5% |
Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Canada Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Canada communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.8% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 27.1%), single mother households (7.0% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 26.1%), and births to unmarried women (36.3% compared to 30.4%, a difference of 19.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.4% compared to 64.0%, a difference of 0.64%), average family size (3.19 compared to 3.12, a difference of 2.3%), and currently married (46.6% compared to 48.8%, a difference of 4.7%).
Family Structure Metric | Chickasaw | Immigrants from Canada |
Family Households | Good 64.4% | Poor 64.0% |
Family Households with Children | Exceptional 28.2% | Tragic 26.5% |
Married-couple Households | Fair 45.9% | Exceptional 48.4% |
Average Family Size | Tragic 3.19 | Tragic 3.12 |
Single Father Households | Tragic 2.8% | Exceptional 2.2% |
Single Mother Households | Tragic 7.0% | Exceptional 5.6% |
Currently Married | Average 46.6% | Exceptional 48.8% |
Divorced or Separated | Tragic 14.2% | Average 12.1% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Tragic 36.3% | Excellent 30.4% |
Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Canada Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Canada communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 13.8%), no vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 11.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 20.2%, a difference of 9.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 91.4%, a difference of 0.97%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.0% compared to 57.5%, a difference of 2.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 20.2%, a difference of 9.8%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Chickasaw | Immigrants from Canada |
No Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.9% | Exceptional 8.7% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 92.3% | Exceptional 91.4% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 59.0% | Exceptional 57.5% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 22.2% | Excellent 20.2% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.4% | Good 6.5% |
Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Canada Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Canada communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.4% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 59.0%), master's degree (11.4% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 50.6%), and doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 49.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of kindergarten (98.4% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.030%), 1st grade (98.3% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.030%), and nursery school (98.4% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.040%).
Education Level Metric | Chickasaw | Immigrants from Canada |
No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.7% | Exceptional 1.6% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.4% | Exceptional 98.4% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.4% | Exceptional 98.4% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.3% | Exceptional 98.4% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.3% | Exceptional 98.3% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.2% | Exceptional 98.2% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 98.0% | Exceptional 98.1% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 97.9% | Exceptional 97.9% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 97.6% | Exceptional 97.7% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 96.7% | Exceptional 96.9% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 96.4% | Exceptional 96.7% |
9th Grade | Exceptional 95.5% | Exceptional 96.0% |
10th Grade | Excellent 94.1% | Exceptional 95.1% |
11th Grade | Fair 92.3% | Exceptional 94.0% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Tragic 90.3% | Exceptional 92.8% |
High School Diploma | Poor 88.4% | Exceptional 91.1% |
GED/Equivalency | Tragic 83.8% | Exceptional 87.9% |
College, Under 1 year | Tragic 60.4% | Exceptional 69.1% |
College, 1 year or more | Tragic 53.3% | Exceptional 63.1% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 38.6% | Exceptional 50.1% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 30.4% | Exceptional 41.7% |
Master's Degree | Tragic 11.4% | Exceptional 17.2% |
Professional Degree | Tragic 3.4% | Exceptional 5.3% |
Doctorate Degree | Tragic 1.5% | Exceptional 2.3% |
Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Canada Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Canada communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (3.2% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 46.8%), disability age 35 to 64 (16.1% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 46.4%), and disability age 65 to 74 (30.2% compared to 22.1%, a difference of 37.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (51.2% compared to 45.7%, a difference of 12.1%), cognitive disability (18.5% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 12.2%), and self-care disability (2.9% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 19.4%).
Disability Metric | Chickasaw | Immigrants from Canada |
Disability | Tragic 15.2% | Tragic 12.1% |
Males | Tragic 15.1% | Tragic 11.9% |
Females | Tragic 15.2% | Fair 12.3% |
Age | Under 5 years | Tragic 1.7% | Tragic 1.4% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 6.8% | Fair 5.7% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 9.0% | Tragic 7.0% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 16.1% | Good 11.0% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 30.2% | Exceptional 22.1% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 51.2% | Exceptional 45.7% |
Vision | Tragic 3.2% | Average 2.2% |
Hearing | Tragic 4.5% | Tragic 3.5% |
Cognitive | Tragic 18.5% | Exceptional 16.5% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 8.0% | Average 6.1% |
Self-Care | Tragic 2.9% | Exceptional 2.4% |