Chickasaw vs Yup'ik Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 30,500,772 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Yup'ik within Chickasaw communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.786. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chickasaw within a typical geography, there is an increase of 50.577% in Yup'ik. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chickasaw corresponds to an increase of 50,577.2 Yup'ik.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Yup'ik communities in the United States are seen in householder income under 25 years ($44,763 compared to $54,732, a difference of 22.3%), median male earnings ($47,832 compared to $39,504, a difference of 21.1%), and per capita income ($36,475 compared to $30,518, a difference of 19.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median household income ($70,005 compared to $69,695, a difference of 0.45%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($82,193 compared to $81,000, a difference of 1.5%), and median female earnings ($34,414 compared to $32,730, a difference of 5.1%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Yup'ik communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (13.1% compared to 32.7%, a difference of 149.5%), married-couple family poverty (5.8% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 131.2%), and single male poverty (16.3% compared to 31.6%, a difference of 93.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single female poverty (26.3% compared to 26.6%, a difference of 1.3%), single mother poverty (34.4% compared to 32.5%, a difference of 6.1%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (24.5% compared to 27.0%, a difference of 10.4%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Yup'ik communities in the United States are seen in male unemployment (5.2% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 217.7%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.2% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 197.8%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.9% compared to 14.4%, a difference of 193.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.3% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 73.7%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (4.7% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 100.8%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.4% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 105.2%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Yup'ik communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.3% compared to 33.3%, a difference of 15.2%), in labor force | age 25-29 (81.9% compared to 73.1%, a difference of 12.1%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (81.9% compared to 76.4%, a difference of 7.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (79.0% compared to 78.6%, a difference of 0.51%), in labor force | age > 16 (62.3% compared to 62.7%, a difference of 0.64%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (76.2% compared to 73.2%, a difference of 4.1%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Yup'ik communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.8% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 95.6%), births to unmarried women (36.3% compared to 56.4%, a difference of 55.5%), and single mother households (7.0% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 42.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (45.9% compared to 44.1%, a difference of 4.2%), family households (64.4% compared to 72.4%, a difference of 12.5%), and currently married (46.6% compared to 39.9%, a difference of 16.8%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Yup'ik communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 45.9%, a difference of 484.0%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.0% compared to 34.9%, a difference of 68.8%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 58.4%, a difference of 57.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 31.5%), 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 14.8%, a difference of 49.6%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 58.4%, a difference of 57.9%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Yup'ik communities in the United States are seen in bachelor's degree (30.4% compared to 19.4%, a difference of 56.6%), associate's degree (38.6% compared to 25.0%, a difference of 54.7%), and no schooling completed (1.7% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 37.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 9th grade (95.5% compared to 95.2%, a difference of 0.33%), 5th grade (97.9% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.34%), and 6th grade (97.6% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.39%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Yup'ik communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.7% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 160.0%), ambulatory disability (8.0% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 55.8%), and self-care disability (2.9% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 53.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 35 to 64 (16.1% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 5.2%), cognitive disability (18.5% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 9.7%), and vision disability (3.2% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 17.8%).