Chickasaw vs Cape Verdean Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 59,378,286 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Cape Verdeans within Chickasaw communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.716. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chickasaw within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.365% in Cape Verdeans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chickasaw corresponds to an increase of 364.6 Cape Verdeans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Cape Verdean communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (27.2% compared to 23.6%, a difference of 15.2%), householder income under 25 years ($44,763 compared to $51,387, a difference of 14.8%), and median female earnings ($34,414 compared to $38,614, a difference of 12.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($82,193 compared to $87,580, a difference of 6.6%), median male earnings ($47,832 compared to $51,103, a difference of 6.8%), and householder income over 65 years ($53,732 compared to $50,077, a difference of 7.3%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Cape Verdean communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (13.1% compared to 21.1%, a difference of 60.9%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.6% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 44.1%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.7% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 37.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family poverty (10.8% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 0.89%), female poverty (15.9% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 1.8%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (19.6% compared to 19.2%, a difference of 2.2%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Cape Verdean communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.3% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 55.3%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.0% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 50.7%), and male unemployment (5.2% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 37.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.3% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 1.7%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.7% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 4.6%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (16.7% compared to 17.5%, a difference of 5.1%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Cape Verdean communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.3% compared to 44.5%, a difference of 16.1%), in labor force | age > 16 (62.3% compared to 66.6%, a difference of 6.9%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (80.9% compared to 85.8%, a difference of 6.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (79.0% compared to 82.1%, a difference of 3.8%), in labor force | age 30-34 (81.9% compared to 85.6%, a difference of 4.4%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (76.2% compared to 80.0%, a difference of 4.9%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Cape Verdean communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (7.0% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 25.7%), married-couple households (45.9% compared to 38.1%, a difference of 20.4%), and currently married (46.6% compared to 39.6%, a difference of 17.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.19 compared to 3.17, a difference of 0.63%), family households (64.4% compared to 61.8%, a difference of 4.2%), and family households with children (28.2% compared to 26.9%, a difference of 4.7%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Cape Verdean communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 98.2%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 69.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 15.0%, a difference of 48.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 84.5%, a difference of 9.2%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.0% compared to 46.8%, a difference of 26.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 15.0%, a difference of 48.0%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Cape Verdean communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.7% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 83.0%), college, under 1 year (60.4% compared to 56.0%, a difference of 7.8%), and college, 1 year or more (53.3% compared to 50.3%, a difference of 6.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of professional degree (3.4% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 0.010%), associate's degree (38.6% compared to 38.8%, a difference of 0.40%), and nursery school (98.4% compared to 97.0%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Cape Verdean communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (4.5% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 42.9%), vision disability (3.2% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 30.0%), and disability age 65 to 74 (30.2% compared to 25.4%, a difference of 18.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 5 to 17 (6.8% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 1.8%), disability age over 75 (51.2% compared to 50.1%, a difference of 2.1%), and cognitive disability (18.5% compared to 19.2%, a difference of 3.9%).