Chickasaw vs Argentinean Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 112,886,123 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Argentineans within Chickasaw communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.700. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chickasaw within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.665% in Argentineans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chickasaw corresponds to an increase of 664.6 Argentineans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Argentinean communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($36,475 compared to $49,862, a difference of 36.7%), median household income ($70,005 compared to $93,960, a difference of 34.2%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($82,193 compared to $110,103, a difference of 34.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.2% compared to 27.0%, a difference of 0.65%), householder income under 25 years ($44,763 compared to $54,154, a difference of 21.0%), and householder income over 65 years ($53,732 compared to $65,246, a difference of 21.4%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Argentinean communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (21.8% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 42.1%), single female poverty (26.3% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 37.5%), and single male poverty (16.3% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 37.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.7% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 9.5%), married-couple family poverty (5.8% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 13.9%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.6% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 15.3%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Argentinean communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.0% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 23.9%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.4% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 17.6%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.2% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 17.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.7% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 0.25%), unemployment (5.0% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.40%), and female unemployment (5.1% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 0.41%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Argentinean communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.3% compared to 33.3%, a difference of 15.1%), in labor force | age > 16 (62.3% compared to 65.7%, a difference of 5.5%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (79.0% compared to 83.3%, a difference of 5.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (74.5% compared to 73.1%, a difference of 1.9%), in labor force | age 25-29 (81.9% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 3.5%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (81.9% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 3.9%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Argentinean communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.8% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 28.3%), births to unmarried women (36.3% compared to 30.0%, a difference of 21.0%), and single mother households (7.0% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 20.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.4% compared to 65.0%, a difference of 0.89%), currently married (46.6% compared to 47.1%, a difference of 1.1%), and average family size (3.19 compared to 3.23, a difference of 1.2%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Argentinean communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 42.4%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 20.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 18.9%, a difference of 17.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 88.9%, a difference of 3.8%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.0% compared to 54.5%, a difference of 8.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 18.9%, a difference of 17.2%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Argentinean communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.4% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 76.3%), master's degree (11.4% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 59.2%), and doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 51.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 10th grade (94.1% compared to 93.7%, a difference of 0.35%), nursery school (98.4% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.42%), and kindergarten (98.4% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.44%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Argentinean communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (16.1% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 71.7%), hearing disability (4.5% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 63.6%), and vision disability (3.2% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 58.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (51.2% compared to 46.2%, a difference of 10.8%), cognitive disability (18.5% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 11.4%), and self-care disability (2.9% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 24.1%).