Tlingit-Haida vs Immigrants from China Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 58,653,551 people shows a moderate negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from China within Tlingit-Haida communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.417. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Tlingit-Haida within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.103% in Immigrants from China. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Tlingit-Haida corresponds to a decrease of 102.7 Immigrants from China.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Tlingit-Haida and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($92,987 compared to $119,756, a difference of 28.8%), median male earnings ($52,409 compared to $67,353, a difference of 28.5%), and median household income ($83,968 compared to $105,335, a difference of 25.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($55,914 compared to $57,931, a difference of 3.6%), householder income over 65 years ($62,922 compared to $69,174, a difference of 9.9%), and wage/income gap (24.0% compared to 26.7%, a difference of 11.4%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Tlingit-Haida and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 65 (8.3% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 37.5%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (9.7% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 36.3%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (13.8% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 23.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty (12.5% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 0.15%), poverty (11.7% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 0.50%), and male poverty (10.9% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 1.9%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Tlingit-Haida and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (20.7% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 166.8%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.9% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 42.8%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (8.7% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 39.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.3% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 0.28%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.3% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 3.6%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.7% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 4.2%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Tlingit-Haida and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (40.5% compared to 31.1%, a difference of 30.0%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.9% compared to 71.1%, a difference of 9.7%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (82.3% compared to 85.4%, a difference of 3.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (65.5% compared to 65.4%, a difference of 0.17%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.4% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 0.23%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.0% compared to 79.7%, a difference of 0.85%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Tlingit-Haida and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.7% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 44.9%), divorced or separated (13.2% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 31.3%), and births to unmarried women (32.2% compared to 24.7%, a difference of 30.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.16 compared to 3.23, a difference of 2.3%), currently married (46.7% compared to 47.9%, a difference of 2.6%), and family households (61.6% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 5.0%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Tlingit-Haida and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.1% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 50.6%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.8% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 13.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.9% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 9.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.1% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 6.0%), 2 or more vehicles in household (55.8% compared to 51.5%, a difference of 8.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.9% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 9.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Tlingit-Haida and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.7% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 81.2%), no schooling completed (1.5% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 76.5%), and professional degree (4.0% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 68.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ged/equivalency (87.0% compared to 86.9%, a difference of 0.15%), nursery school (98.7% compared to 97.5%, a difference of 1.3%), and kindergarten (98.7% compared to 97.4%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Tlingit-Haida and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (4.8% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 84.6%), disability age under 5 (1.5% compared to 0.96%, a difference of 60.2%), and vision disability (2.9% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 55.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.2% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 1.8%), self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 4.6%), and disability age over 75 (50.6% compared to 46.3%, a difference of 9.3%).