Chickasaw vs Spanish American Community Comparison

COMPARE

Chickasaw
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Spanish American
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Chickasaw

Spanish Americans

Fair
Poor
3,663
SOCIAL INDEX
34.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
212th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
1,871
SOCIAL INDEX
16.3/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
284th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Spanish American Integration in Chickasaw Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 68,554,516 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Spanish Americans within Chickasaw communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.721. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chickasaw within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.069% in Spanish Americans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chickasaw corresponds to an increase of 68.5 Spanish Americans.
Chickasaw Integration in Spanish American Communities

Chickasaw vs Spanish American Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Spanish American communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (27.2% compared to 24.6%, a difference of 10.3%), median household income ($70,005 compared to $75,386, a difference of 7.7%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($77,929 compared to $83,722, a difference of 7.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median male earnings ($47,832 compared to $49,008, a difference of 2.5%), median earnings ($40,672 compared to $42,316, a difference of 4.0%), and householder income under 25 years ($44,763 compared to $46,913, a difference of 4.8%).
Chickasaw vs Spanish American Income
Income MetricChickasawSpanish American
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$36,475
Tragic
$39,012
Median Family Income
Tragic
$85,356
Tragic
$90,322
Median Household Income
Tragic
$70,005
Tragic
$75,386
Median Earnings
Tragic
$40,672
Tragic
$42,316
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$47,832
Tragic
$49,008
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$34,414
Tragic
$36,391
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$44,763
Tragic
$46,913
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$77,929
Tragic
$83,722
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$82,193
Tragic
$87,836
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$53,732
Tragic
$57,021
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
27.2%
Exceptional
24.6%

Chickasaw vs Spanish American Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Spanish American communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.6% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 16.0%), single male poverty (16.3% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 14.7%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.7% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 13.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of poverty (14.7% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 0.53%), child poverty among girls under 16 (19.6% compared to 19.8%, a difference of 0.92%), and male poverty (13.5% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 1.1%).
Chickasaw vs Spanish American Poverty
Poverty MetricChickasawSpanish American
Poverty
Tragic
14.7%
Tragic
14.7%
Families
Tragic
10.8%
Tragic
11.2%
Males
Tragic
13.5%
Tragic
13.4%
Females
Tragic
15.9%
Tragic
16.2%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
24.5%
Tragic
21.9%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
17.0%
Tragic
16.7%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
21.8%
Tragic
20.1%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
19.5%
Tragic
19.2%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
19.8%
Tragic
19.4%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
19.6%
Tragic
19.8%
Single Males
Tragic
16.3%
Tragic
14.2%
Single Females
Tragic
26.3%
Tragic
24.2%
Single Fathers
Tragic
19.0%
Tragic
16.9%
Single Mothers
Tragic
34.4%
Tragic
32.3%
Married Couples
Tragic
5.8%
Tragic
6.2%
Seniors Over 65 years
Good
10.7%
Tragic
12.2%
Seniors Over 75 years
Exceptional
11.6%
Tragic
13.5%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
13.1%
Tragic
14.0%

Chickasaw vs Spanish American Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Spanish American communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 22.4%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.4% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 16.8%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.0% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 16.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.2% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 0.050%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.6% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 2.9%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.8% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 3.1%).
Chickasaw vs Spanish American Unemployment
Unemployment MetricChickasawSpanish American
Unemployment
Exceptional
5.0%
Tragic
5.6%
Males
Excellent
5.2%
Tragic
5.7%
Females
Excellent
5.1%
Tragic
5.6%
Youth < 25
Exceptional
11.2%
Tragic
12.2%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Exceptional
16.7%
Tragic
18.2%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
9.9%
Tragic
10.8%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Fair
6.7%
Tragic
7.0%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
6.2%
Tragic
6.2%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
4.9%
Tragic
5.3%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
4.2%
Tragic
4.7%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Good
4.8%
Tragic
4.9%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.3%
Tragic
5.3%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
4.7%
Fair
5.4%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
4.4%
Average
5.1%
Seniors > 75
Exceptional
7.3%
Exceptional
8.0%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
9.0%
Fair
7.7%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
8.6%
Exceptional
8.4%
Women w/ Children < 18
Good
5.4%
Tragic
5.8%

Chickasaw vs Spanish American Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Spanish American communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 35-44 (80.9% compared to 82.8%, a difference of 2.3%), in labor force | age 20-64 (76.2% compared to 77.8%, a difference of 2.2%), and in labor force | age > 16 (62.3% compared to 63.6%, a difference of 2.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (79.0% compared to 80.1%, a difference of 1.3%), in labor force | age 16-19 (38.3% compared to 39.0%, a difference of 1.7%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (74.5% compared to 75.8%, a difference of 1.9%).
Chickasaw vs Spanish American Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricChickasawSpanish American
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
62.3%
Tragic
63.6%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
76.2%
Tragic
77.8%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
38.3%
Exceptional
39.0%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Poor
74.5%
Exceptional
75.8%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
81.9%
Tragic
83.4%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
81.9%
Tragic
83.5%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
80.9%
Tragic
82.8%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
79.0%
Tragic
80.1%

Chickasaw vs Spanish American Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Spanish American communities in the United States are seen in divorced or separated (14.2% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 6.5%), births to unmarried women (36.3% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 6.2%), and currently married (46.6% compared to 45.0%, a difference of 3.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother households (7.0% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 0.25%), family households (64.4% compared to 64.1%, a difference of 0.44%), and average family size (3.19 compared to 3.24, a difference of 1.7%).
Chickasaw vs Spanish American Family Structure
Family Structure MetricChickasawSpanish American
Family Households
Good
64.4%
Fair
64.1%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
28.2%
Average
27.4%
Married-couple Households
Fair
45.9%
Tragic
44.5%
Average Family Size
Tragic
3.19
Good
3.24
Single Father Households
Tragic
2.8%
Tragic
2.8%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
7.0%
Tragic
7.0%
Currently Married
Average
46.6%
Tragic
45.0%
Divorced or Separated
Tragic
14.2%
Tragic
13.3%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
36.3%
Tragic
38.6%

Chickasaw vs Spanish American Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Spanish American communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 15.2%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 7.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 3.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (59.0% compared to 58.9%, a difference of 0.21%), 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 91.4%, a difference of 0.97%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 3.7%).
Chickasaw vs Spanish American Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricChickasawSpanish American
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.9%
Exceptional
9.1%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
92.3%
Exceptional
91.4%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
59.0%
Exceptional
58.9%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
22.2%
Exceptional
23.0%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.4%
Exceptional
8.0%

Chickasaw vs Spanish American Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Spanish American communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.7% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 26.4%), professional degree (3.4% compared to 3.9%, a difference of 15.7%), and master's degree (11.4% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 14.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ged/equivalency (83.8% compared to 83.6%, a difference of 0.22%), nursery school (98.4% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.40%), and kindergarten (98.4% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.40%).
Chickasaw vs Spanish American Education Level
Education Level MetricChickasawSpanish American
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.7%
Fair
2.1%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.4%
Average
98.0%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.4%
Average
98.0%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Average
97.9%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Average
97.9%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Average
97.8%
4th Grade
Exceptional
98.0%
Fair
97.5%
5th Grade
Exceptional
97.9%
Fair
97.3%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.6%
Fair
97.0%
7th Grade
Exceptional
96.7%
Tragic
95.7%
8th Grade
Exceptional
96.4%
Tragic
95.4%
9th Grade
Exceptional
95.5%
Tragic
94.2%
10th Grade
Excellent
94.1%
Tragic
92.9%
11th Grade
Fair
92.3%
Tragic
91.4%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
90.3%
Tragic
89.9%
High School Diploma
Poor
88.4%
Tragic
87.7%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
83.8%
Tragic
83.6%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
60.4%
Tragic
62.6%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
53.3%
Tragic
56.3%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
38.6%
Tragic
41.8%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
30.4%
Tragic
33.1%
Master's Degree
Tragic
11.4%
Tragic
13.0%
Professional Degree
Tragic
3.4%
Tragic
3.9%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.5%
Poor
1.7%

Chickasaw vs Spanish American Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Spanish American communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.7% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 52.2%), disability age 35 to 64 (16.1% compared to 13.7%, a difference of 17.9%), and disability age 65 to 74 (30.2% compared to 25.9%, a difference of 16.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.9% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 1.1%), disability age over 75 (51.2% compared to 50.0%, a difference of 2.4%), and cognitive disability (18.5% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 2.9%).
Chickasaw vs Spanish American Disability
Disability MetricChickasawSpanish American
Disability
Tragic
15.2%
Tragic
13.6%
Males
Tragic
15.1%
Tragic
13.3%
Females
Tragic
15.2%
Tragic
14.0%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.7%
Exceptional
1.1%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
6.8%
Tragic
6.2%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
9.0%
Tragic
7.9%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
16.1%
Tragic
13.7%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
30.2%
Tragic
25.9%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
51.2%
Tragic
50.0%
Vision
Tragic
3.2%
Tragic
2.9%
Hearing
Tragic
4.5%
Tragic
4.0%
Cognitive
Tragic
18.5%
Tragic
18.0%
Ambulatory
Tragic
8.0%
Tragic
7.1%
Self-Care
Tragic
2.9%
Tragic
2.8%