Chickasaw vs Carpatho Rusyn Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 38,614,866 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Carpatho Rusyns within Chickasaw communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.201. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chickasaw within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.119% in Carpatho Rusyns. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chickasaw corresponds to an increase of 118.7 Carpatho Rusyns.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Carpatho Rusyn communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($36,475 compared to $47,248, a difference of 29.5%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($77,929 compared to $99,449, a difference of 27.6%), and median family income ($85,356 compared to $107,502, a difference of 26.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.2% compared to 27.3%, a difference of 0.38%), householder income under 25 years ($44,763 compared to $49,113, a difference of 9.7%), and householder income over 65 years ($53,732 compared to $61,093, a difference of 13.7%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Carpatho Rusyn communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (5.8% compared to 3.9%, a difference of 47.0%), family poverty (10.8% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 43.8%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (17.0% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 32.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.6% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 5.3%), single father poverty (19.0% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 5.5%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.7% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 9.7%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Carpatho Rusyn communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.3% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 31.6%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.6% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 16.4%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.2% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 16.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.8% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 0.040%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 0.20%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.2% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 0.97%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Carpatho Rusyn communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.3% compared to 40.8%, a difference of 6.5%), in labor force | age 25-29 (81.9% compared to 87.0%, a difference of 6.2%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (80.9% compared to 85.6%, a difference of 5.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (74.5% compared to 76.5%, a difference of 2.7%), in labor force | age > 16 (62.3% compared to 65.0%, a difference of 4.4%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (81.9% compared to 86.2%, a difference of 5.2%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Carpatho Rusyn communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.8% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 31.2%), single mother households (7.0% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 24.4%), and divorced or separated (14.2% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 19.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (45.9% compared to 45.7%, a difference of 0.44%), currently married (46.6% compared to 47.0%, a difference of 0.97%), and average family size (3.19 compared to 3.06, a difference of 4.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Carpatho Rusyn communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 35.8%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 34.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 23.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 89.5%, a difference of 3.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.0% compared to 54.4%, a difference of 8.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 23.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Carpatho Rusyn communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.4% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 56.8%), master's degree (11.4% compared to 17.5%, a difference of 53.3%), and doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 49.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.4% compared to 98.7%, a difference of 0.31%), kindergarten (98.4% compared to 98.7%, a difference of 0.31%), and 1st grade (98.3% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.31%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Carpatho Rusyn communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (3.2% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 53.5%), disability age 65 to 74 (30.2% compared to 21.6%, a difference of 40.0%), and disability age 35 to 64 (16.1% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 39.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.5% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 8.7%), disability age 5 to 17 (6.8% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 9.2%), and disability age over 75 (51.2% compared to 44.8%, a difference of 14.3%).