Chickasaw vs Bhutanese Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 140,277,272 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Bhutanese within Chickasaw communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.070. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chickasaw within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.009% in Bhutanese. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chickasaw corresponds to a decrease of 8.7 Bhutanese.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Bhutanese communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($82,193 compared to $117,750, a difference of 43.3%), median household income ($70,005 compared to $100,151, a difference of 43.1%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($77,929 compared to $109,520, a difference of 40.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.2% compared to 27.0%, a difference of 0.67%), median female earnings ($34,414 compared to $43,648, a difference of 26.8%), and householder income under 25 years ($44,763 compared to $57,078, a difference of 27.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Bhutanese communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (21.8% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 63.4%), child poverty among boys under 16 (19.8% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 57.2%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (19.5% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 55.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.6% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 10.0%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.7% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 14.3%), and single father poverty (19.0% compared to 15.0%, a difference of 26.6%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Bhutanese communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.0% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 33.6%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 19.1%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.9% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 13.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.2% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 0.11%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (9.9% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 0.62%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (16.7% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 1.6%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Bhutanese communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 45-54 (79.0% compared to 83.5%, a difference of 5.7%), in labor force | age 16-19 (38.3% compared to 36.3%, a difference of 5.6%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (76.2% compared to 80.2%, a difference of 5.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (74.5% compared to 75.4%, a difference of 1.3%), in labor force | age 25-29 (81.9% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 3.6%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (81.9% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 3.7%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Bhutanese communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (7.0% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 33.5%), single father households (2.8% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 30.2%), and births to unmarried women (36.3% compared to 27.9%, a difference of 30.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.19 compared to 3.25, a difference of 1.9%), family households (64.4% compared to 65.9%, a difference of 2.3%), and family households with children (28.2% compared to 27.3%, a difference of 3.4%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Bhutanese communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 10.9%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 4.9%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 91.4%, a difference of 0.98%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (59.0% compared to 59.1%, a difference of 0.14%), 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 0.20%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 91.4%, a difference of 0.98%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Bhutanese communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 61.8%), doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 53.8%), and master's degree (11.4% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 50.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 8th grade (96.4% compared to 96.4%, a difference of 0.080%), nursery school (98.4% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.14%), and 4th grade (98.0% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.14%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Bhutanese communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (16.1% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 63.7%), vision disability (3.2% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 62.2%), and disability age under 5 (1.7% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 48.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (51.2% compared to 47.1%, a difference of 8.7%), cognitive disability (18.5% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 11.7%), and self-care disability (2.9% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 20.0%).