Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Latvia Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 62,690,693 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Latvia within Chickasaw communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.360. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chickasaw within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.104% in Immigrants from Latvia. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chickasaw corresponds to an increase of 103.9 Immigrants from Latvia.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Latvia communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($36,475 compared to $50,914, a difference of 39.6%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($82,193 compared to $111,454, a difference of 35.6%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($77,929 compared to $105,522, a difference of 35.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.2% compared to 26.7%, a difference of 1.5%), householder income under 25 years ($44,763 compared to $51,737, a difference of 15.6%), and householder income over 65 years ($53,732 compared to $64,298, a difference of 19.7%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Latvia communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (21.8% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 39.8%), family poverty (10.8% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 37.9%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (17.0% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 36.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.7% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 1.6%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.6% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 3.0%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (24.5% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 20.0%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Latvia communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.0% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 31.6%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 19.3%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.4% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 14.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female unemployment (5.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.15%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 0.20%), and male unemployment (5.2% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.55%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Latvia communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 45-54 (79.0% compared to 83.4%, a difference of 5.5%), in labor force | age 20-64 (76.2% compared to 80.1%, a difference of 5.2%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (80.9% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 5.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (74.5% compared to 75.0%, a difference of 0.71%), in labor force | age 16-19 (38.3% compared to 36.8%, a difference of 4.2%), and in labor force | age > 16 (62.3% compared to 65.1%, a difference of 4.5%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Latvia communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.8% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 42.4%), single mother households (7.0% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 28.6%), and births to unmarried women (36.3% compared to 29.1%, a difference of 24.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (45.9% compared to 46.0%, a difference of 0.21%), currently married (46.6% compared to 46.7%, a difference of 0.33%), and average family size (3.19 compared to 3.13, a difference of 1.7%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Latvia communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 53.9%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 35.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 27.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 88.1%, a difference of 4.8%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.0% compared to 52.2%, a difference of 12.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 27.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Latvia communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.4% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 73.7%), master's degree (11.4% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 66.8%), and doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 57.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 8th grade (96.4% compared to 96.3%, a difference of 0.11%), 4th grade (98.0% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.16%), and 9th grade (95.5% compared to 95.6%, a difference of 0.16%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Latvia communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (16.1% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 59.1%), vision disability (3.2% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 55.5%), and hearing disability (4.5% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 43.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.5% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 7.8%), disability age over 75 (51.2% compared to 46.2%, a difference of 10.8%), and self-care disability (2.9% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 20.9%).