Chickasaw vs Salvadoran Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 131,979,400 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Salvadorans within Chickasaw communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.066. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chickasaw within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.013% in Salvadorans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chickasaw corresponds to an increase of 13.1 Salvadorans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Salvadoran communities in the United States are seen in householder income under 25 years ($44,763 compared to $55,412, a difference of 23.8%), wage/income gap (27.2% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 18.1%), and median household income ($70,005 compared to $82,449, a difference of 17.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median male earnings ($47,832 compared to $48,646, a difference of 1.7%), median earnings ($40,672 compared to $42,912, a difference of 5.5%), and per capita income ($36,475 compared to $38,858, a difference of 6.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Salvadoran communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (16.3% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 30.3%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (24.5% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 28.2%), and single father poverty (19.0% compared to 14.9%, a difference of 27.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of receiving food stamps (13.1% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 0.89%), child poverty among girls under 16 (19.6% compared to 19.4%, a difference of 1.3%), and family poverty (10.8% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Salvadoran communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.4% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 27.6%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (4.7% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 23.8%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 22.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.7% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 3.3%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.2% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 3.9%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.9% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 4.4%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Salvadoran communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.3% compared to 34.5%, a difference of 11.1%), in labor force | age > 16 (62.3% compared to 66.8%, a difference of 7.3%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (76.2% compared to 79.5%, a difference of 4.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (74.5% compared to 75.3%, a difference of 1.2%), in labor force | age 25-29 (81.9% compared to 83.8%, a difference of 2.4%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (81.9% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 2.8%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Salvadoran communities in the United States are seen in divorced or separated (14.2% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 22.0%), average family size (3.19 compared to 3.48, a difference of 9.1%), and currently married (46.6% compared to 43.5%, a difference of 7.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of births to unmarried women (36.3% compared to 36.0%, a difference of 0.82%), married-couple households (45.9% compared to 44.7%, a difference of 2.6%), and family households (64.4% compared to 67.2%, a difference of 4.3%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Salvadoran communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 28.1%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 5.3%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (59.0% compared to 56.3%, a difference of 4.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 21.8%, a difference of 1.8%), 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 90.0%, a difference of 2.6%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (59.0% compared to 56.3%, a difference of 4.8%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Salvadoran communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.7% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 121.0%), high school diploma (88.4% compared to 81.7%, a difference of 8.3%), and 10th grade (94.1% compared to 87.5%, a difference of 7.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of associate's degree (38.6% compared to 39.0%, a difference of 1.1%), nursery school (98.4% compared to 96.4%, a difference of 2.1%), and kindergarten (98.4% compared to 96.3%, a difference of 2.1%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Salvadoran communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (4.5% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 71.6%), disability age under 5 (1.7% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 59.8%), and disability age 35 to 64 (16.1% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 50.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (51.2% compared to 48.9%, a difference of 4.7%), cognitive disability (18.5% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 5.1%), and self-care disability (2.9% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 15.1%).