Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Oceania Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 119,698,402 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Oceania within Chickasaw communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.168. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chickasaw within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.021% in Immigrants from Oceania. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chickasaw corresponds to an increase of 20.6 Immigrants from Oceania.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in median household income ($70,005 compared to $89,100, a difference of 27.3%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($82,193 compared to $103,705, a difference of 26.2%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($77,929 compared to $97,623, a difference of 25.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.2% compared to 25.6%, a difference of 5.9%), median male earnings ($47,832 compared to $55,712, a difference of 16.5%), and median earnings ($40,672 compared to $47,617, a difference of 17.1%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (16.3% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 31.5%), child poverty under the age of 5 (21.8% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 29.1%), and single female poverty (26.3% compared to 20.7%, a difference of 27.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.6% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 0.19%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.7% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 2.4%), and receiving food stamps (13.1% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 15.0%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.3% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 22.3%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.0% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 19.8%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.2% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 15.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female unemployment (5.1% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 0.38%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (9.9% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 0.48%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.4% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (62.3% compared to 65.5%, a difference of 5.1%), in labor force | age 20-64 (76.2% compared to 79.3%, a difference of 4.1%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (79.0% compared to 82.1%, a difference of 3.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 16-19 (38.3% compared to 37.9%, a difference of 1.1%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.5% compared to 76.1%, a difference of 2.2%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (81.9% compared to 84.0%, a difference of 2.6%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in divorced or separated (14.2% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 19.1%), births to unmarried women (36.3% compared to 30.6%, a difference of 18.7%), and single mother households (7.0% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 12.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (46.6% compared to 46.5%, a difference of 0.12%), family households with children (28.2% compared to 28.1%, a difference of 0.38%), and family households (64.4% compared to 64.9%, a difference of 0.78%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 23.8%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 2.6%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (59.0% compared to 57.5%, a difference of 2.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 21.8%, a difference of 1.8%), 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 90.4%, a difference of 2.1%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (59.0% compared to 57.5%, a difference of 2.5%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.4% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 35.9%), no schooling completed (1.7% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 32.4%), and master's degree (11.4% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 28.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 11th grade (92.3% compared to 92.2%, a difference of 0.11%), high school diploma (88.4% compared to 88.8%, a difference of 0.43%), and nursery school (98.4% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.58%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.7% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 49.8%), vision disability (3.2% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 46.3%), and disability age 35 to 64 (16.1% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 41.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.5% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 5.1%), disability age over 75 (51.2% compared to 48.0%, a difference of 6.6%), and self-care disability (2.9% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 14.6%).