Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Armenia Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 58,846,406 people shows a substantial negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Armenia within Chickasaw communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.504. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chickasaw within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.122% in Immigrants from Armenia. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chickasaw corresponds to a decrease of 122.5 Immigrants from Armenia.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Armenia communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (27.2% compared to 20.7%, a difference of 31.1%), per capita income ($36,475 compared to $44,552, a difference of 22.1%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($77,929 compared to $94,867, a difference of 21.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($53,732 compared to $53,974, a difference of 0.45%), median male earnings ($47,832 compared to $51,793, a difference of 8.3%), and median earnings ($40,672 compared to $46,094, a difference of 13.3%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Armenia communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.6% compared to 17.5%, a difference of 50.0%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.7% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 42.1%), and single female poverty (26.3% compared to 18.7%, a difference of 40.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of receiving food stamps (13.1% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 0.62%), female poverty (15.9% compared to 15.1%, a difference of 5.1%), and poverty (14.7% compared to 13.9%, a difference of 5.8%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Armenia communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.2% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 44.6%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.4% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 39.7%), and unemployment (5.0% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 38.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.6% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 5.4%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.2% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 10.4%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.3% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 12.8%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Armenia communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.3% compared to 29.0%, a difference of 32.0%), in labor force | age > 16 (62.3% compared to 65.3%, a difference of 4.9%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (76.2% compared to 79.2%, a difference of 4.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (81.9% compared to 84.4%, a difference of 3.0%), in labor force | age 45-54 (79.0% compared to 81.7%, a difference of 3.3%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (80.9% compared to 83.7%, a difference of 3.5%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Armenia communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (36.3% compared to 26.1%, a difference of 39.3%), single mother households (7.0% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 36.6%), and divorced or separated (14.2% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 34.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.4% compared to 63.5%, a difference of 1.4%), married-couple households (45.9% compared to 44.3%, a difference of 3.7%), and average family size (3.19 compared to 3.35, a difference of 5.0%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Armenia communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 34.7%), 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 18.6%, a difference of 19.2%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 14.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 89.4%, a difference of 3.2%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.0% compared to 53.3%, a difference of 10.7%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 14.9%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Armenia communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.7% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 97.5%), professional degree (3.4% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 34.9%), and bachelor's degree (30.4% compared to 39.4%, a difference of 29.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ged/equivalency (83.8% compared to 83.1%, a difference of 0.88%), nursery school (98.4% compared to 96.7%, a difference of 1.8%), and kindergarten (98.4% compared to 96.6%, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Armenia communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.7% compared to 0.76%, a difference of 130.1%), disability age 18 to 34 (9.0% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 79.4%), and disability age 5 to 17 (6.8% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 68.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.5% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 3.3%), disability age over 75 (51.2% compared to 54.3%, a difference of 6.1%), and disability age 65 to 74 (30.2% compared to 28.0%, a difference of 8.0%).