Chickasaw vs Ugandan Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 63,688,684 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Ugandans within Chickasaw communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.662. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chickasaw within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.114% in Ugandans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chickasaw corresponds to an increase of 114.0 Ugandans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Ugandan communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($82,193 compared to $103,472, a difference of 25.9%), median household income ($70,005 compared to $87,557, a difference of 25.1%), and median family income ($85,356 compared to $106,541, a difference of 24.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.2% compared to 24.1%, a difference of 12.9%), householder income under 25 years ($44,763 compared to $50,923, a difference of 13.8%), and householder income over 65 years ($53,732 compared to $61,177, a difference of 13.9%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Ugandan communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (16.3% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 32.5%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (17.0% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 27.3%), and single female poverty (26.3% compared to 20.8%, a difference of 26.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.6% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 2.1%), receiving food stamps (13.1% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 6.9%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.7% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 7.0%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Ugandan communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.6% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 39.9%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.2% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 26.4%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.0% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 18.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.7% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 0.74%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (16.7% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 0.90%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.9% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 2.6%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Ugandan communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (62.3% compared to 67.4%, a difference of 8.2%), in labor force | age 45-54 (79.0% compared to 83.7%, a difference of 5.9%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (76.2% compared to 80.6%, a difference of 5.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (74.5% compared to 75.4%, a difference of 1.2%), in labor force | age 16-19 (38.3% compared to 38.9%, a difference of 1.4%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (81.9% compared to 85.8%, a difference of 4.7%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Ugandan communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (36.3% compared to 30.1%, a difference of 20.6%), divorced or separated (14.2% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 20.5%), and single father households (2.8% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 18.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.19 compared to 3.23, a difference of 1.4%), family households with children (28.2% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 2.8%), and family households (64.4% compared to 61.7%, a difference of 4.4%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Ugandan communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 45.4%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 30.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 24.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 88.9%, a difference of 3.8%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.0% compared to 53.5%, a difference of 10.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 24.8%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Ugandan communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.4% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 52.2%), master's degree (11.4% compared to 17.1%, a difference of 50.0%), and doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 47.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 10th grade (94.1% compared to 94.0%, a difference of 0.030%), nursery school (98.4% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.39%), and kindergarten (98.4% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.40%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Ugandan communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (4.5% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 55.9%), disability age under 5 (1.7% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 53.1%), and vision disability (3.2% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 52.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.5% compared to 18.3%, a difference of 0.81%), disability age over 75 (51.2% compared to 46.3%, a difference of 10.6%), and disability age 5 to 17 (6.8% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 11.1%).