Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Japan Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 124,560,160 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Japan within Chickasaw communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.259. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chickasaw within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.076% in Immigrants from Japan. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chickasaw corresponds to an increase of 75.8 Immigrants from Japan.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Japan communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($36,475 compared to $53,359, a difference of 46.3%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($82,193 compared to $118,498, a difference of 44.2%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($77,929 compared to $112,228, a difference of 44.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.2% compared to 27.9%, a difference of 2.6%), householder income under 25 years ($44,763 compared to $55,932, a difference of 24.9%), and householder income over 65 years ($53,732 compared to $69,774, a difference of 29.9%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Japan communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (21.8% compared to 13.8%, a difference of 58.4%), child poverty among boys under 16 (19.8% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 50.8%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (19.5% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 49.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.6% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 0.45%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.7% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 5.4%), and single father poverty (19.0% compared to 15.3%, a difference of 23.6%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Japan communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.0% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 37.0%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.2% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 20.7%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.9% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 15.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (16.7% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 0.20%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.2% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 0.73%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.2% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Japan communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.3% compared to 34.7%, a difference of 10.6%), in labor force | age > 16 (62.3% compared to 65.8%, a difference of 5.7%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (79.0% compared to 83.3%, a difference of 5.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (74.5% compared to 74.1%, a difference of 0.49%), in labor force | age 25-29 (81.9% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 3.9%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (81.9% compared to 85.4%, a difference of 4.2%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Japan communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.8% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 39.8%), births to unmarried women (36.3% compared to 26.4%, a difference of 37.4%), and single mother households (7.0% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 34.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.19 compared to 3.18, a difference of 0.33%), family households (64.4% compared to 63.4%, a difference of 1.6%), and currently married (46.6% compared to 48.0%, a difference of 3.0%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Japan communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 45.5%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 18.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 19.0%, a difference of 16.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 88.7%, a difference of 4.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.0% compared to 54.7%, a difference of 7.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 19.0%, a difference of 16.6%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Japan communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.4% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 89.3%), doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 84.5%), and master's degree (11.4% compared to 20.0%, a difference of 75.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 9th grade (95.5% compared to 95.6%, a difference of 0.12%), 8th grade (96.4% compared to 96.2%, a difference of 0.19%), and nursery school (98.4% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.21%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Japan communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (16.1% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 68.8%), vision disability (3.2% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 65.5%), and disability age under 5 (1.7% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 61.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.5% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 9.6%), disability age over 75 (51.2% compared to 46.3%, a difference of 10.5%), and self-care disability (2.9% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 23.6%).