Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Ghana Community Comparison

COMPARE

Chickasaw
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Immigrants from Ghana
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Chickasaw

Immigrants from Ghana

Fair
Poor
3,663
SOCIAL INDEX
34.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
212th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
1,709
SOCIAL INDEX
14.6/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
290th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Immigrants from Ghana Integration in Chickasaw Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 90,105,696 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Ghana within Chickasaw communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.304. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chickasaw within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.039% in Immigrants from Ghana. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chickasaw corresponds to an increase of 39.4 Immigrants from Ghana.
Chickasaw Integration in Immigrants from Ghana Communities

Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Ghana Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Ghana communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (27.2% compared to 22.3%, a difference of 21.7%), median household income ($70,005 compared to $81,489, a difference of 16.4%), and median female earnings ($34,414 compared to $39,894, a difference of 15.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median male earnings ($47,832 compared to $51,836, a difference of 8.4%), householder income over 65 years ($53,732 compared to $58,624, a difference of 9.1%), and median earnings ($40,672 compared to $45,641, a difference of 12.2%).
Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Ghana Income
Income MetricChickasawImmigrants from Ghana
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$36,475
Tragic
$41,131
Median Family Income
Tragic
$85,356
Tragic
$96,544
Median Household Income
Tragic
$70,005
Tragic
$81,489
Median Earnings
Tragic
$40,672
Fair
$45,641
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$47,832
Tragic
$51,836
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$34,414
Good
$39,894
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$44,763
Poor
$51,333
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$77,929
Tragic
$87,760
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$82,193
Tragic
$94,982
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$53,732
Tragic
$58,624
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
27.2%
Exceptional
22.3%

Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Ghana Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Ghana communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.6% compared to 14.4%, a difference of 23.4%), single male poverty (16.3% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 22.0%), and single female poverty (26.3% compared to 21.9%, a difference of 19.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family poverty (10.8% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 0.040%), child poverty among boys under 16 (19.8% compared to 19.4%, a difference of 2.1%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (19.5% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 2.1%).
Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Ghana Poverty
Poverty MetricChickasawImmigrants from Ghana
Poverty
Tragic
14.7%
Tragic
14.2%
Families
Tragic
10.8%
Tragic
10.8%
Males
Tragic
13.5%
Tragic
12.9%
Females
Tragic
15.9%
Tragic
15.3%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
24.5%
Poor
20.5%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
17.0%
Tragic
14.7%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
21.8%
Tragic
19.6%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
19.5%
Tragic
19.1%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
19.8%
Tragic
19.4%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
19.6%
Tragic
18.9%
Single Males
Tragic
16.3%
Tragic
13.4%
Single Females
Tragic
26.3%
Tragic
21.9%
Single Fathers
Tragic
19.0%
Tragic
16.7%
Single Mothers
Tragic
34.4%
Poor
29.9%
Married Couples
Tragic
5.8%
Tragic
5.9%
Seniors Over 65 years
Good
10.7%
Tragic
12.8%
Seniors Over 75 years
Exceptional
11.6%
Tragic
14.4%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
13.1%
Tragic
14.1%

Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Ghana Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Ghana communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.3% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 25.6%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 22.0%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (9.9% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 20.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.2% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 1.3%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.0% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 7.7%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.9% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 10.0%).
Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Ghana Unemployment
Unemployment MetricChickasawImmigrants from Ghana
Unemployment
Exceptional
5.0%
Tragic
6.1%
Males
Excellent
5.2%
Tragic
6.2%
Females
Excellent
5.1%
Tragic
6.0%
Youth < 25
Exceptional
11.2%
Tragic
13.4%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Exceptional
16.7%
Tragic
19.8%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
9.9%
Tragic
11.9%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Fair
6.7%
Tragic
7.5%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
6.2%
Tragic
6.1%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
4.9%
Tragic
5.4%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
4.2%
Tragic
5.0%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Good
4.8%
Tragic
5.3%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.3%
Tragic
5.1%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
4.7%
Tragic
5.6%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
4.4%
Tragic
5.4%
Seniors > 75
Exceptional
7.3%
Tragic
9.2%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
9.0%
Tragic
8.3%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
8.6%
Tragic
9.5%
Women w/ Children < 18
Good
5.4%
Tragic
6.2%

Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Ghana Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Ghana communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.3% compared to 35.4%, a difference of 8.3%), in labor force | age > 16 (62.3% compared to 67.1%, a difference of 7.7%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (76.2% compared to 80.0%, a difference of 5.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (74.5% compared to 74.5%, a difference of 0.090%), in labor force | age 25-29 (81.9% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 3.5%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (81.9% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 4.0%).
Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Ghana Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricChickasawImmigrants from Ghana
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
62.3%
Exceptional
67.1%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
76.2%
Exceptional
80.0%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
38.3%
Tragic
35.4%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Poor
74.5%
Poor
74.5%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
81.9%
Good
84.7%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
81.9%
Exceptional
85.2%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
80.9%
Exceptional
84.7%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
79.0%
Good
82.9%

Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Ghana Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Ghana communities in the United States are seen in divorced or separated (14.2% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 16.4%), single mother households (7.0% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 13.4%), and single father households (2.8% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 12.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (28.2% compared to 28.6%, a difference of 1.3%), family households (64.4% compared to 63.4%, a difference of 1.6%), and average family size (3.19 compared to 3.29, a difference of 3.1%).
Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Ghana Family Structure
Family Structure MetricChickasawImmigrants from Ghana
Family Households
Good
64.4%
Tragic
63.4%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
28.2%
Exceptional
28.6%
Married-couple Households
Fair
45.9%
Tragic
41.8%
Average Family Size
Tragic
3.19
Exceptional
3.29
Single Father Households
Tragic
2.8%
Tragic
2.4%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
7.0%
Tragic
8.0%
Currently Married
Average
46.6%
Tragic
42.7%
Divorced or Separated
Tragic
14.2%
Poor
12.2%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
36.3%
Tragic
34.5%

Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Ghana Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Ghana communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 111.3%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 43.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 16.2%, a difference of 37.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 83.4%, a difference of 10.6%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.0% compared to 47.4%, a difference of 24.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 16.2%, a difference of 37.4%).
Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Ghana Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricChickasawImmigrants from Ghana
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.9%
Tragic
16.6%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
92.3%
Tragic
83.4%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
59.0%
Tragic
47.4%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
22.2%
Tragic
16.2%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.4%
Tragic
5.2%

Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Ghana Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Ghana communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.7% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 53.8%), master's degree (11.4% compared to 15.0%, a difference of 31.2%), and bachelor's degree (30.4% compared to 36.9%, a difference of 21.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ged/equivalency (83.8% compared to 83.9%, a difference of 0.050%), 12th grade, no diploma (90.3% compared to 89.7%, a difference of 0.72%), and nursery school (98.4% compared to 97.4%, a difference of 0.99%).
Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Ghana Education Level
Education Level MetricChickasawImmigrants from Ghana
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.7%
Tragic
2.6%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.4%
Tragic
97.4%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.4%
Tragic
97.4%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Tragic
97.4%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Tragic
97.3%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Tragic
97.2%
4th Grade
Exceptional
98.0%
Tragic
96.9%
5th Grade
Exceptional
97.9%
Tragic
96.6%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.6%
Tragic
96.3%
7th Grade
Exceptional
96.7%
Tragic
95.2%
8th Grade
Exceptional
96.4%
Tragic
94.8%
9th Grade
Exceptional
95.5%
Tragic
93.8%
10th Grade
Excellent
94.1%
Tragic
92.5%
11th Grade
Fair
92.3%
Tragic
91.2%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
90.3%
Tragic
89.7%
High School Diploma
Poor
88.4%
Tragic
87.4%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
83.8%
Tragic
83.9%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
60.4%
Tragic
63.1%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
53.3%
Tragic
57.4%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
38.6%
Poor
44.8%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
30.4%
Fair
36.9%
Master's Degree
Tragic
11.4%
Average
15.0%
Professional Degree
Tragic
3.4%
Poor
4.1%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.5%
Fair
1.8%

Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Ghana Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Ghana communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (4.5% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 74.2%), disability age under 5 (1.7% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 42.9%), and vision disability (3.2% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 41.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.5% compared to 18.3%, a difference of 1.1%), disability age over 75 (51.2% compared to 47.7%, a difference of 7.3%), and self-care disability (2.9% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 13.5%).
Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Ghana Disability
Disability MetricChickasawImmigrants from Ghana
Disability
Tragic
15.2%
Good
11.6%
Males
Tragic
15.1%
Excellent
10.9%
Females
Tragic
15.2%
Average
12.2%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.7%
Good
1.2%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
6.8%
Tragic
5.9%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
9.0%
Average
6.6%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
16.1%
Tragic
11.8%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
30.2%
Tragic
24.5%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
51.2%
Poor
47.7%
Vision
Tragic
3.2%
Tragic
2.2%
Hearing
Tragic
4.5%
Exceptional
2.6%
Cognitive
Tragic
18.5%
Tragic
18.3%
Ambulatory
Tragic
8.0%
Average
6.1%
Self-Care
Tragic
2.9%
Poor
2.5%