Chickasaw vs German Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,720,201 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Germans within Chickasaw communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.056. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chickasaw within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.040% in Germans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chickasaw corresponds to a decrease of 39.6 Germans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and German communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($82,193 compared to $100,224, a difference of 21.9%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($77,929 compared to $93,531, a difference of 20.0%), and median family income ($85,356 compared to $102,254, a difference of 19.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.2% compared to 29.2%, a difference of 7.4%), median female earnings ($34,414 compared to $37,986, a difference of 10.4%), and householder income over 65 years ($53,732 compared to $59,730, a difference of 11.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and German communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (5.8% compared to 4.0%, a difference of 43.5%), family poverty (10.8% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 41.6%), and receiving food stamps (13.1% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 34.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (19.0% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 7.0%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.6% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 12.4%), and single mother poverty (34.4% compared to 30.0%, a difference of 14.8%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and German communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.3% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 39.6%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.2% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 16.1%), and female unemployment (5.1% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 14.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (9.9% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 3.5%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.3% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 3.8%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.7% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 4.4%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and German communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.3% compared to 44.2%, a difference of 15.2%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.5% compared to 78.6%, a difference of 5.6%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (79.0% compared to 83.1%, a difference of 5.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (62.3% compared to 64.4%, a difference of 3.4%), in labor force | age 30-34 (81.9% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 3.6%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (81.9% compared to 85.3%, a difference of 4.1%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and German communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (7.0% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 22.4%), single father households (2.8% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 15.7%), and divorced or separated (14.2% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 13.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.4% compared to 64.4%, a difference of 0.060%), average family size (3.19 compared to 3.09, a difference of 3.2%), and family households with children (28.2% compared to 27.1%, a difference of 4.2%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and German communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 17.7%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.0% compared to 61.6%, a difference of 4.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 22.7%, a difference of 2.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 0.20%), 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 93.6%, a difference of 1.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 22.7%, a difference of 2.5%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and German communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.7% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 25.0%), master's degree (11.4% compared to 14.0%, a difference of 22.7%), and professional degree (3.4% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 21.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of kindergarten (98.4% compared to 98.7%, a difference of 0.34%), nursery school (98.4% compared to 98.7%, a difference of 0.35%), and 1st grade (98.3% compared to 98.7%, a difference of 0.35%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and German communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (3.2% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 42.6%), disability age 35 to 64 (16.1% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 31.1%), and disability age 65 to 74 (30.2% compared to 23.3%, a difference of 29.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age under 5 (1.7% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 1.1%), disability age over 75 (51.2% compared to 46.3%, a difference of 10.6%), and cognitive disability (18.5% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 11.0%).