Chickasaw vs Cuban Community Comparison
COMPARE
Chickasaw
Cuban
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Chickasaw
Cubans
3,663
SOCIAL INDEX
34.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
212th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
3,662
SOCIAL INDEX
34.1/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
213th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Cuban Integration in Chickasaw Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 136,252,751 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Cubans within Chickasaw communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.583. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chickasaw within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.073% in Cubans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chickasaw corresponds to an increase of 72.8 Cubans.
Chickasaw vs Cuban Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Cuban communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (27.2% compared to 23.3%, a difference of 16.8%), householder income under 25 years ($44,763 compared to $50,655, a difference of 13.2%), and householder income over 65 years ($53,732 compared to $49,152, a difference of 9.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median earnings ($40,672 compared to $40,619, a difference of 0.13%), median family income ($85,356 compared to $84,981, a difference of 0.44%), and median female earnings ($34,414 compared to $34,942, a difference of 1.5%).
Income Metric | Chickasaw | Cuban |
Per Capita Income | Tragic $36,475 | Tragic $37,383 |
Median Family Income | Tragic $85,356 | Tragic $84,981 |
Median Household Income | Tragic $70,005 | Tragic $73,392 |
Median Earnings | Tragic $40,672 | Tragic $40,619 |
Median Male Earnings | Tragic $47,832 | Tragic $46,580 |
Median Female Earnings | Tragic $34,414 | Tragic $34,942 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Tragic $44,763 | Tragic $50,655 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Tragic $77,929 | Tragic $81,483 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Tragic $82,193 | Tragic $86,301 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Tragic $53,732 | Tragic $49,152 |
Wage/Income Gap | Tragic 27.2% | Exceptional 23.3% |
Chickasaw vs Cuban Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Cuban communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.6% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 54.2%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.7% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 50.7%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (24.5% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 42.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family poverty (10.8% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 2.0%), female poverty (15.9% compared to 15.3%, a difference of 3.6%), and poverty (14.7% compared to 13.9%, a difference of 5.8%).
Poverty Metric | Chickasaw | Cuban |
Poverty | Tragic 14.7% | Tragic 13.9% |
Families | Tragic 10.8% | Tragic 10.6% |
Males | Tragic 13.5% | Tragic 12.4% |
Females | Tragic 15.9% | Tragic 15.3% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 24.5% | Exceptional 17.2% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 17.0% | Tragic 14.7% |
Children Under 5 years | Tragic 21.8% | Tragic 19.1% |
Children Under 16 years | Tragic 19.5% | Tragic 17.8% |
Boys Under 16 years | Tragic 19.8% | Tragic 17.9% |
Girls Under 16 years | Tragic 19.6% | Tragic 18.0% |
Single Males | Tragic 16.3% | Good 12.6% |
Single Females | Tragic 26.3% | Average 21.0% |
Single Fathers | Tragic 19.0% | Poor 16.6% |
Single Mothers | Tragic 34.4% | Fair 29.6% |
Married Couples | Tragic 5.8% | Tragic 6.8% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Good 10.7% | Tragic 16.1% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Exceptional 11.6% | Tragic 18.0% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Tragic 13.1% | Tragic 18.2% |
Chickasaw vs Cuban Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Cuban communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.0% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 28.0%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.2% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 21.9%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.9% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 17.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (4.7% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 1.1%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (16.7% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 1.5%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.4% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 3.0%).
Unemployment Metric | Chickasaw | Cuban |
Unemployment | Exceptional 5.0% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Males | Excellent 5.2% | Exceptional 4.6% |
Females | Excellent 5.1% | Exceptional 4.9% |
Youth < 25 | Exceptional 11.2% | Exceptional 10.6% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Exceptional 16.7% | Exceptional 16.9% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Exceptional 9.9% | Exceptional 9.2% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Fair 6.7% | Exceptional 5.9% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Tragic 6.2% | Exceptional 5.1% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 4.9% | Exceptional 4.2% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Exceptional 4.2% | Exceptional 4.0% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Good 4.8% | Exceptional 4.2% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Exceptional 4.3% | Exceptional 4.5% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 4.7% | Exceptional 4.8% |
Seniors > 65 | Exceptional 4.4% | Exceptional 4.6% |
Seniors > 75 | Exceptional 7.3% | Exceptional 8.0% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Tragic 9.0% | Exceptional 7.0% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Exceptional 8.6% | Poor 9.2% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Good 5.4% | Exceptional 5.2% |
Chickasaw vs Cuban Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Cuban communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.3% compared to 31.8%, a difference of 20.6%), in labor force | age 45-54 (79.0% compared to 83.4%, a difference of 5.5%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (80.9% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 4.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (81.9% compared to 83.5%, a difference of 1.9%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.5% compared to 72.5%, a difference of 2.7%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (81.9% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 2.8%).
Labor Participation Metric | Chickasaw | Cuban |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 62.3% | Tragic 64.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Tragic 76.2% | Average 79.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 38.3% | Tragic 31.8% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Poor 74.5% | Tragic 72.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Tragic 81.9% | Tragic 83.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 81.9% | Tragic 84.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 80.9% | Exceptional 84.8% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 79.0% | Exceptional 83.4% |
Chickasaw vs Cuban Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Cuban communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (36.3% compared to 39.4%, a difference of 8.5%), single father households (2.8% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 6.3%), and family households (64.4% compared to 67.7%, a difference of 5.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (45.9% compared to 45.4%, a difference of 1.2%), average family size (3.19 compared to 3.25, a difference of 2.0%), and divorced or separated (14.2% compared to 14.5%, a difference of 2.1%).
Family Structure Metric | Chickasaw | Cuban |
Family Households | Good 64.4% | Exceptional 67.7% |
Family Households with Children | Exceptional 28.2% | Poor 27.1% |
Married-couple Households | Fair 45.9% | Tragic 45.4% |
Average Family Size | Tragic 3.19 | Excellent 3.25 |
Single Father Households | Tragic 2.8% | Tragic 2.6% |
Single Mother Households | Tragic 7.0% | Tragic 7.2% |
Currently Married | Average 46.6% | Tragic 44.6% |
Divorced or Separated | Tragic 14.2% | Tragic 14.5% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Tragic 36.3% | Tragic 39.4% |
Chickasaw vs Cuban Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Cuban communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 24.8%), 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 15.0%), and no vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 8.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 91.5%, a difference of 0.80%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.0% compared to 56.3%, a difference of 4.8%), and no vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 8.3%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Chickasaw | Cuban |
No Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.9% | Exceptional 8.5% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 92.3% | Exceptional 91.5% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 59.0% | Excellent 56.3% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 22.2% | Fair 19.3% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.4% | Tragic 6.0% |
Chickasaw vs Cuban Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Cuban communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.7% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 48.4%), professional degree (3.4% compared to 4.0%, a difference of 17.9%), and doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 9.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of college, 1 year or more (53.3% compared to 53.4%, a difference of 0.13%), nursery school (98.4% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.83%), and kindergarten (98.4% compared to 97.5%, a difference of 0.87%).
Education Level Metric | Chickasaw | Cuban |
No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.7% | Tragic 2.5% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.4% | Tragic 97.6% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.4% | Tragic 97.5% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.3% | Tragic 97.5% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.3% | Tragic 97.4% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.2% | Tragic 97.3% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 98.0% | Tragic 96.9% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 97.9% | Tragic 96.6% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 97.6% | Tragic 96.2% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 96.7% | Tragic 94.6% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 96.4% | Tragic 94.1% |
9th Grade | Exceptional 95.5% | Tragic 93.2% |
10th Grade | Excellent 94.1% | Tragic 91.5% |
11th Grade | Fair 92.3% | Tragic 90.2% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Tragic 90.3% | Tragic 88.9% |
High School Diploma | Poor 88.4% | Tragic 85.4% |
GED/Equivalency | Tragic 83.8% | Tragic 82.0% |
College, Under 1 year | Tragic 60.4% | Tragic 58.6% |
College, 1 year or more | Tragic 53.3% | Tragic 53.4% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 38.6% | Tragic 41.9% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 30.4% | Tragic 32.5% |
Master's Degree | Tragic 11.4% | Tragic 12.1% |
Professional Degree | Tragic 3.4% | Tragic 4.0% |
Doctorate Degree | Tragic 1.5% | Tragic 1.4% |
Chickasaw vs Cuban Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Cuban communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (16.1% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 60.7%), hearing disability (4.5% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 57.3%), and disability age 18 to 34 (9.0% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 57.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.9% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 4.7%), disability age over 75 (51.2% compared to 47.4%, a difference of 8.0%), and cognitive disability (18.5% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 12.3%).
Disability Metric | Chickasaw | Cuban |
Disability | Tragic 15.2% | Average 11.7% |
Males | Tragic 15.1% | Good 11.0% |
Females | Tragic 15.2% | Fair 12.3% |
Age | Under 5 years | Tragic 1.7% | Average 1.2% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 6.8% | Exceptional 5.3% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 9.0% | Exceptional 5.7% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 16.1% | Exceptional 10.0% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 30.2% | Average 23.3% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 51.2% | Average 47.4% |
Vision | Tragic 3.2% | Tragic 2.4% |
Hearing | Tragic 4.5% | Excellent 2.8% |
Cognitive | Tragic 18.5% | Exceptional 16.5% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 8.0% | Tragic 6.4% |
Self-Care | Tragic 2.9% | Tragic 2.7% |