Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Cuba Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 115,646,410 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Cuba within Chickasaw communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.434. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chickasaw within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.045% in Immigrants from Cuba. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chickasaw corresponds to an increase of 44.9 Immigrants from Cuba.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Cuba communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (27.2% compared to 22.4%, a difference of 21.5%), householder income over 65 years ($53,732 compared to $44,735, a difference of 20.1%), and householder income under 25 years ($44,763 compared to $50,374, a difference of 12.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($77,929 compared to $76,701, a difference of 1.6%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($82,193 compared to $80,662, a difference of 1.9%), and median household income ($70,005 compared to $68,461, a difference of 2.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Cuba communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.6% compared to 19.9%, a difference of 71.0%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.7% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 67.8%), and receiving food stamps (13.1% compared to 20.8%, a difference of 59.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of poverty (14.7% compared to 14.6%, a difference of 0.77%), female poverty (15.9% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 1.8%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (19.5% compared to 18.7%, a difference of 4.2%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Cuba communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.0% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 33.9%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.2% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 24.5%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.9% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 20.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.3% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 0.050%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (16.7% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 0.65%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.3% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 1.2%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Cuba communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.3% compared to 30.2%, a difference of 26.7%), in labor force | age 45-54 (79.0% compared to 83.7%, a difference of 5.9%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (80.9% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 5.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (81.9% compared to 83.2%, a difference of 1.6%), in labor force | age 30-34 (81.9% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 2.7%), and in labor force | age > 16 (62.3% compared to 64.1%, a difference of 2.9%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Cuba communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (36.3% compared to 41.5%, a difference of 14.2%), divorced or separated (14.2% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 7.2%), and single mother households (7.0% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 6.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.19 compared to 3.26, a difference of 2.4%), single father households (2.8% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 3.4%), and married-couple households (45.9% compared to 44.2%, a difference of 3.9%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Cuba communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 31.2%), 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 18.4%), and no vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 10.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 91.3%, a difference of 1.0%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.0% compared to 55.3%, a difference of 6.7%), and no vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 10.8%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Cuba communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.7% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 66.5%), doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 28.3%), and college, under 1 year (60.4% compared to 55.7%, a difference of 8.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of bachelor's degree (30.4% compared to 30.3%, a difference of 0.23%), nursery school (98.4% compared to 97.2%, a difference of 1.2%), and kindergarten (98.4% compared to 97.1%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Cuba communities in the United States are seen in disability age 18 to 34 (9.0% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 67.3%), disability age 35 to 64 (16.1% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 66.4%), and hearing disability (4.5% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 63.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.9% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 0.62%), disability age over 75 (51.2% compared to 47.7%, a difference of 7.3%), and cognitive disability (18.5% compared to 16.3%, a difference of 13.2%).