Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Moldova Community Comparison

COMPARE

Chickasaw
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Immigrants from Moldova
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Chickasaw

Immigrants from Moldova

Fair
Exceptional
3,663
SOCIAL INDEX
34.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
212th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
9,434
SOCIAL INDEX
91.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
16th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Immigrants from Moldova Integration in Chickasaw Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 67,352,025 people shows a strong negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Moldova within Chickasaw communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.712. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chickasaw within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.021% in Immigrants from Moldova. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chickasaw corresponds to a decrease of 20.8 Immigrants from Moldova.
Chickasaw Integration in Immigrants from Moldova Communities

Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Moldova Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Moldova communities in the United States are seen in median household income ($70,005 compared to $91,446, a difference of 30.6%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($82,193 compared to $107,357, a difference of 30.6%), and per capita income ($36,475 compared to $47,489, a difference of 30.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.2% compared to 26.2%, a difference of 3.7%), householder income over 65 years ($53,732 compared to $62,939, a difference of 17.1%), and median female earnings ($34,414 compared to $42,304, a difference of 22.9%).
Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Moldova Income
Income MetricChickasawImmigrants from Moldova
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$36,475
Exceptional
$47,489
Median Family Income
Tragic
$85,356
Exceptional
$109,975
Median Household Income
Tragic
$70,005
Exceptional
$91,446
Median Earnings
Tragic
$40,672
Exceptional
$50,274
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$47,832
Exceptional
$59,417
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$34,414
Exceptional
$42,304
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$44,763
Exceptional
$56,168
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$77,929
Exceptional
$101,091
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$82,193
Exceptional
$107,357
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$53,732
Excellent
$62,939
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
27.2%
Fair
26.2%

Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Moldova Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Moldova communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (21.8% compared to 14.5%, a difference of 50.5%), single male poverty (16.3% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 46.2%), and single female poverty (26.3% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 42.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.6% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 2.5%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.7% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 2.9%), and receiving food stamps (13.1% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 20.1%).
Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Moldova Poverty
Poverty MetricChickasawImmigrants from Moldova
Poverty
Tragic
14.7%
Exceptional
10.9%
Families
Tragic
10.8%
Exceptional
7.7%
Males
Tragic
13.5%
Exceptional
9.9%
Females
Tragic
15.9%
Exceptional
11.9%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
24.5%
Exceptional
17.9%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
17.0%
Exceptional
12.1%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
21.8%
Exceptional
14.5%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
19.5%
Exceptional
13.8%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
19.8%
Exceptional
14.1%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
19.6%
Exceptional
13.9%
Single Males
Tragic
16.3%
Exceptional
11.2%
Single Females
Tragic
26.3%
Exceptional
18.5%
Single Fathers
Tragic
19.0%
Exceptional
15.2%
Single Mothers
Tragic
34.4%
Exceptional
26.2%
Married Couples
Tragic
5.8%
Exceptional
4.7%
Seniors Over 65 years
Good
10.7%
Exceptional
10.4%
Seniors Over 75 years
Exceptional
11.6%
Good
11.9%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
13.1%
Excellent
10.9%

Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Moldova Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Moldova communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.0% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 35.8%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.2% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 20.4%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.3% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 13.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.2% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 0.060%), unemployment (5.0% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 0.99%), and male unemployment (5.2% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.99%).
Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Moldova Unemployment
Unemployment MetricChickasawImmigrants from Moldova
Unemployment
Exceptional
5.0%
Exceptional
5.0%
Males
Excellent
5.2%
Exceptional
5.1%
Females
Excellent
5.1%
Exceptional
4.9%
Youth < 25
Exceptional
11.2%
Exceptional
11.2%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Exceptional
16.7%
Exceptional
17.1%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
9.9%
Exceptional
9.8%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Fair
6.7%
Excellent
6.5%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
6.2%
Exceptional
5.1%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
4.9%
Exceptional
4.4%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
4.2%
Exceptional
4.1%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Good
4.8%
Exceptional
4.5%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.3%
Exceptional
4.6%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
4.7%
Exceptional
5.1%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
4.4%
Exceptional
4.9%
Seniors > 75
Exceptional
7.3%
Exceptional
8.3%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
9.0%
Exceptional
6.6%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
8.6%
Exceptional
8.4%
Women w/ Children < 18
Good
5.4%
Exceptional
5.0%

Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Moldova Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Moldova communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (62.3% compared to 66.1%, a difference of 6.2%), in labor force | age 45-54 (79.0% compared to 83.7%, a difference of 5.9%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (76.2% compared to 80.6%, a difference of 5.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 16-19 (38.3% compared to 37.7%, a difference of 1.7%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.5% compared to 76.6%, a difference of 2.9%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (81.9% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 4.0%).
Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Moldova Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricChickasawImmigrants from Moldova
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
62.3%
Exceptional
66.1%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
76.2%
Exceptional
80.6%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
38.3%
Exceptional
37.7%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Poor
74.5%
Exceptional
76.6%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
81.9%
Exceptional
85.1%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
81.9%
Exceptional
85.3%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
80.9%
Exceptional
85.0%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
79.0%
Exceptional
83.7%

Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Moldova Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Moldova communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (36.3% compared to 27.3%, a difference of 33.0%), single father households (2.8% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 28.9%), and single mother households (7.0% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 24.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.4% compared to 64.4%, a difference of 0.050%), average family size (3.19 compared to 3.18, a difference of 0.35%), and family households with children (28.2% compared to 27.6%, a difference of 2.1%).
Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Moldova Family Structure
Family Structure MetricChickasawImmigrants from Moldova
Family Households
Good
64.4%
Good
64.4%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
28.2%
Good
27.6%
Married-couple Households
Fair
45.9%
Exceptional
48.0%
Average Family Size
Tragic
3.19
Tragic
3.18
Single Father Households
Tragic
2.8%
Exceptional
2.1%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
7.0%
Exceptional
5.6%
Currently Married
Average
46.6%
Exceptional
48.5%
Divorced or Separated
Tragic
14.2%
Average
12.1%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
36.3%
Exceptional
27.3%

Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Moldova Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Moldova communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 24.8%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 24.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 16.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 90.2%, a difference of 2.2%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.0% compared to 56.1%, a difference of 5.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 16.4%).
Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Moldova Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricChickasawImmigrants from Moldova
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.9%
Excellent
9.8%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
92.3%
Excellent
90.2%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
59.0%
Excellent
56.1%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
22.2%
Fair
19.1%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.4%
Tragic
6.0%

Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Moldova Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Moldova communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (11.4% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 45.5%), professional degree (3.4% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 45.0%), and bachelor's degree (30.4% compared to 41.6%, a difference of 36.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 9th grade (95.5% compared to 95.5%, a difference of 0.080%), 8th grade (96.4% compared to 96.2%, a difference of 0.19%), and 7th grade (96.7% compared to 96.5%, a difference of 0.26%).
Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Moldova Education Level
Education Level MetricChickasawImmigrants from Moldova
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.7%
Good
2.0%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.4%
Good
98.0%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.4%
Good
98.0%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Good
98.0%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Good
97.9%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Good
97.9%
4th Grade
Exceptional
98.0%
Excellent
97.7%
5th Grade
Exceptional
97.9%
Excellent
97.5%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.6%
Excellent
97.3%
7th Grade
Exceptional
96.7%
Exceptional
96.5%
8th Grade
Exceptional
96.4%
Exceptional
96.2%
9th Grade
Exceptional
95.5%
Exceptional
95.5%
10th Grade
Excellent
94.1%
Exceptional
94.7%
11th Grade
Fair
92.3%
Exceptional
93.7%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
90.3%
Exceptional
92.6%
High School Diploma
Poor
88.4%
Exceptional
90.7%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
83.8%
Exceptional
87.7%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
60.4%
Exceptional
69.0%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
53.3%
Exceptional
63.0%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
38.6%
Exceptional
50.2%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
30.4%
Exceptional
41.6%
Master's Degree
Tragic
11.4%
Exceptional
16.6%
Professional Degree
Tragic
3.4%
Exceptional
4.9%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.5%
Excellent
2.0%

Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Moldova Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Moldova communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (3.2% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 55.4%), disability age 35 to 64 (16.1% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 52.3%), and disability age under 5 (1.7% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 52.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (51.2% compared to 47.4%, a difference of 7.9%), cognitive disability (18.5% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 10.7%), and self-care disability (2.9% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 11.7%).
Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Moldova Disability
Disability MetricChickasawImmigrants from Moldova
Disability
Tragic
15.2%
Good
11.6%
Males
Tragic
15.1%
Good
11.1%
Females
Tragic
15.2%
Excellent
12.0%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.7%
Exceptional
1.1%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
6.8%
Exceptional
5.2%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
9.0%
Good
6.5%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
16.1%
Exceptional
10.6%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
30.2%
Excellent
22.7%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
51.2%
Fair
47.4%
Vision
Tragic
3.2%
Exceptional
2.0%
Hearing
Tragic
4.5%
Average
3.0%
Cognitive
Tragic
18.5%
Exceptional
16.7%
Ambulatory
Tragic
8.0%
Excellent
6.0%
Self-Care
Tragic
2.9%
Tragic
2.6%