Chickasaw vs Asian Community Comparison
COMPARE
Chickasaw
Asian
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Chickasaw
Asians
3,663
SOCIAL INDEX
34.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
212th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
8,712
SOCIAL INDEX
84.6/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
56th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Asian Integration in Chickasaw Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 10,305,554 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Asians within Chickasaw communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.289. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chickasaw within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.064% in Asians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chickasaw corresponds to a decrease of 64.3 Asians.
Chickasaw vs Asian Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Asian communities in the United States are seen in median household income ($70,005 compared to $101,681, a difference of 45.3%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($77,929 compared to $112,666, a difference of 44.6%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($82,193 compared to $118,426, a difference of 44.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.2% compared to 26.9%, a difference of 0.86%), householder income under 25 years ($44,763 compared to $57,003, a difference of 27.3%), and householder income over 65 years ($53,732 compared to $68,822, a difference of 28.1%).
Income Metric | Chickasaw | Asian |
Per Capita Income | Tragic $36,475 | Exceptional $50,057 |
Median Family Income | Tragic $85,356 | Exceptional $119,955 |
Median Household Income | Tragic $70,005 | Exceptional $101,681 |
Median Earnings | Tragic $40,672 | Exceptional $53,690 |
Median Male Earnings | Tragic $47,832 | Exceptional $63,827 |
Median Female Earnings | Tragic $34,414 | Exceptional $44,586 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Tragic $44,763 | Exceptional $57,003 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Tragic $77,929 | Exceptional $112,666 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Tragic $82,193 | Exceptional $118,426 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Tragic $53,732 | Exceptional $68,822 |
Wage/Income Gap | Tragic 27.2% | Tragic 26.9% |
Chickasaw vs Asian Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Asian communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (21.8% compared to 14.0%, a difference of 56.3%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (17.0% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 49.1%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (19.8% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 46.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.7% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 2.7%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.6% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 3.2%), and married-couple family poverty (5.8% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 24.3%).
Poverty Metric | Chickasaw | Asian |
Poverty | Tragic 14.7% | Exceptional 11.0% |
Families | Tragic 10.8% | Exceptional 7.7% |
Males | Tragic 13.5% | Exceptional 10.0% |
Females | Tragic 15.9% | Exceptional 11.9% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 24.5% | Exceptional 18.2% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 17.0% | Exceptional 11.4% |
Children Under 5 years | Tragic 21.8% | Exceptional 14.0% |
Children Under 16 years | Tragic 19.5% | Exceptional 13.5% |
Boys Under 16 years | Tragic 19.8% | Exceptional 13.5% |
Girls Under 16 years | Tragic 19.6% | Exceptional 13.7% |
Single Males | Tragic 16.3% | Exceptional 11.2% |
Single Females | Tragic 26.3% | Exceptional 18.3% |
Single Fathers | Tragic 19.0% | Exceptional 14.6% |
Single Mothers | Tragic 34.4% | Exceptional 26.0% |
Married Couples | Tragic 5.8% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Good 10.7% | Excellent 10.4% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Exceptional 11.6% | Good 12.0% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Tragic 13.1% | Exceptional 9.7% |
Chickasaw vs Asian Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Asian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.0% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 34.3%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.2% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 21.0%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.4% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 14.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female unemployment (5.1% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 0.49%), unemployment (5.0% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 1.1%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (16.7% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 1.3%).
Unemployment Metric | Chickasaw | Asian |
Unemployment | Exceptional 5.0% | Excellent 5.1% |
Males | Excellent 5.2% | Exceptional 5.1% |
Females | Excellent 5.1% | Good 5.2% |
Youth < 25 | Exceptional 11.2% | Good 11.4% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Exceptional 16.7% | Exceptional 16.9% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Exceptional 9.9% | Good 10.2% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Fair 6.7% | Exceptional 6.3% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Tragic 6.2% | Exceptional 5.1% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 4.9% | Exceptional 4.4% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Exceptional 4.2% | Exceptional 4.3% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Good 4.8% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Exceptional 4.3% | Average 4.9% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 4.7% | Exceptional 5.3% |
Seniors > 65 | Exceptional 4.4% | Excellent 5.1% |
Seniors > 75 | Exceptional 7.3% | Exceptional 8.3% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Tragic 9.0% | Exceptional 6.7% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Exceptional 8.6% | Exceptional 8.0% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Good 5.4% | Exceptional 5.1% |
Chickasaw vs Asian Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Asian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.3% compared to 34.1%, a difference of 12.5%), in labor force | age > 16 (62.3% compared to 66.2%, a difference of 6.3%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (79.0% compared to 83.4%, a difference of 5.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (74.5% compared to 73.7%, a difference of 1.1%), in labor force | age 25-29 (81.9% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 3.6%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (81.9% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 3.9%).
Labor Participation Metric | Chickasaw | Asian |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 62.3% | Exceptional 66.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Tragic 76.2% | Exceptional 80.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 38.3% | Tragic 34.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Poor 74.5% | Tragic 73.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Tragic 81.9% | Good 84.8% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 81.9% | Exceptional 85.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 80.9% | Exceptional 84.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 79.0% | Exceptional 83.4% |
Chickasaw vs Asian Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Asian communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (36.3% compared to 26.8%, a difference of 35.5%), divorced or separated (14.2% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 33.6%), and single father households (2.8% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 31.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.19 compared to 3.28, a difference of 2.9%), family households with children (28.2% compared to 29.1%, a difference of 2.9%), and family households (64.4% compared to 66.5%, a difference of 3.3%).
Family Structure Metric | Chickasaw | Asian |
Family Households | Good 64.4% | Exceptional 66.5% |
Family Households with Children | Exceptional 28.2% | Exceptional 29.1% |
Married-couple Households | Fair 45.9% | Exceptional 49.5% |
Average Family Size | Tragic 3.19 | Exceptional 3.28 |
Single Father Households | Tragic 2.8% | Exceptional 2.1% |
Single Mother Households | Tragic 7.0% | Exceptional 5.6% |
Currently Married | Average 46.6% | Exceptional 48.4% |
Divorced or Separated | Tragic 14.2% | Exceptional 10.6% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Tragic 36.3% | Exceptional 26.8% |
Chickasaw vs Asian Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Asian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 14.2%), 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 20.8%, a difference of 7.0%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 6.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 91.1%, a difference of 1.3%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.0% compared to 57.0%, a difference of 3.5%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 6.1%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Chickasaw | Asian |
No Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.9% | Exceptional 9.0% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 92.3% | Exceptional 91.1% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 59.0% | Exceptional 57.0% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 22.2% | Exceptional 20.8% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.4% | Exceptional 7.0% |
Chickasaw vs Asian Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Asian communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.4% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 63.9%), master's degree (11.4% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 61.5%), and doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 60.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 11th grade (92.3% compared to 92.5%, a difference of 0.19%), 10th grade (94.1% compared to 93.5%, a difference of 0.62%), and nursery school (98.4% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.76%).
Education Level Metric | Chickasaw | Asian |
No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.7% | Tragic 2.4% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.4% | Tragic 97.6% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.4% | Tragic 97.6% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.3% | Tragic 97.6% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.3% | Tragic 97.5% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.2% | Tragic 97.4% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 98.0% | Tragic 97.1% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 97.9% | Tragic 96.9% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 97.6% | Tragic 96.6% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 96.7% | Tragic 95.5% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 96.4% | Tragic 95.2% |
9th Grade | Exceptional 95.5% | Tragic 94.5% |
10th Grade | Excellent 94.1% | Fair 93.5% |
11th Grade | Fair 92.3% | Average 92.5% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Tragic 90.3% | Good 91.4% |
High School Diploma | Poor 88.4% | Good 89.4% |
GED/Equivalency | Tragic 83.8% | Exceptional 86.7% |
College, Under 1 year | Tragic 60.4% | Exceptional 69.4% |
College, 1 year or more | Tragic 53.3% | Exceptional 64.2% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 38.6% | Exceptional 52.1% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 30.4% | Exceptional 44.4% |
Master's Degree | Tragic 11.4% | Exceptional 18.4% |
Professional Degree | Tragic 3.4% | Exceptional 5.5% |
Doctorate Degree | Tragic 1.5% | Exceptional 2.4% |
Chickasaw vs Asian Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Asian communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (16.1% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 71.7%), vision disability (3.2% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 67.3%), and hearing disability (4.5% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 63.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (51.2% compared to 46.9%, a difference of 9.0%), cognitive disability (18.5% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 10.4%), and self-care disability (2.9% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 22.9%).
Disability Metric | Chickasaw | Asian |
Disability | Tragic 15.2% | Exceptional 10.4% |
Males | Tragic 15.1% | Exceptional 10.0% |
Females | Tragic 15.2% | Exceptional 10.9% |
Age | Under 5 years | Tragic 1.7% | Exceptional 1.1% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 6.8% | Exceptional 4.8% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 9.0% | Exceptional 5.8% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 16.1% | Exceptional 9.4% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 30.2% | Exceptional 21.4% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 51.2% | Excellent 46.9% |
Vision | Tragic 3.2% | Exceptional 1.9% |
Hearing | Tragic 4.5% | Exceptional 2.7% |
Cognitive | Tragic 18.5% | Exceptional 16.7% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 8.0% | Exceptional 5.4% |
Self-Care | Tragic 2.9% | Exceptional 2.3% |